1 resultado para second-best policy
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (8)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (124)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (23)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (22)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (33)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (5)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (29)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (12)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (9)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (15)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (17)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (4)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (26)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (157)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (17)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (15)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (10)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (15)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (124)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (14)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Introduction: The nutrition of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants is aimed at promoting a similar growth to that occurring in the uterus. However, in practice this is difficult to achieve and extrauterine growth restriction is frequent. The current tendency is to avoid this restriction by means of early parenteral and enteral nutrition. Nonetheless, uncertainty about many of the practices related with nutrition has resulted in a great variation in the way it is undertaken. In 2009 and 2011 in our hospital there was an unexpected increase in necrotizing enterocolitis. To check to see wether our nutrition policy was involved, we underlook a systematic review and drewup clinical practice guidelines (CPG) about enteral feeding in VLBW infants. New considerations about the duration of the fortification and the use of probiotics have led to an update of these CPG. Methods: A total of 21 clinical questions were designed dealing with the type of milk, starting age, mode of administration, rate and volume of the increments, fortification, use of probiotics and protocol. Afete conducting a systematic search of the available evidence, the information was contrasted and summarized in order to draw up the recommendations. The quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were determined from the SIGN scale. Comment: These CPG aim to help physicians in their decision making. The protocolized application of well-proven measurements reduces the variation in clinical practice and improves results.