1 resultado para care and consideration
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (3)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (16)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (37)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (18)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (21)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (19)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Harvard University (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (30)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (4)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (175)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (201)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (11)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (64)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- University of Washington (7)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (9)
Resumo:
Irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation represent a relevant and common health issue. However, real-world clinical practice includes patients with constipation who may or may not have other abdominal complaints (pain, bloating, abdominal discomfort) with variable frequency. The goal of the present study was to obtain information on the workload entailed by patients with constipation and associated abdominal complaints, predominant clinical behaviors, education needs, and potential daily practice aids both in Primary Care and gastroenterology settings. The clinical behavior of doctors is generally similar at both levels, despite differences in healthcare approach: use of empiric therapies and clinically guided diagnostic tests, with some differences in colonoscopy use (not always directly accessible from Primary Care). Regarding perceptions, general support and osmotic laxatives are most valued by PC doctors, whereas osmotic laxatives, combined laxatives, and linaclotide are most valued by GE specialists. Furthermore, over half of respondents considered differentiating both diagnoses as challenging. Finally, considerable education needs are self-acknowledged at both levels, as is a demand for guidelines and protocols to help in managing this issue in clinical practice. A strength of this study is its providing a joint photograph of the medical approach and the perceptions of constipation with abdominal discomfort from a medical standpoint. Weaknesses include self-declaration (no formal validation) and a response rate potentially biased by professional motivation.