1 resultado para campus behavior management
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (10)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (18)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (29)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (8)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (5)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (13)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (555)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (6)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (44)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (6)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (11)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation represent a relevant and common health issue. However, real-world clinical practice includes patients with constipation who may or may not have other abdominal complaints (pain, bloating, abdominal discomfort) with variable frequency. The goal of the present study was to obtain information on the workload entailed by patients with constipation and associated abdominal complaints, predominant clinical behaviors, education needs, and potential daily practice aids both in Primary Care and gastroenterology settings. The clinical behavior of doctors is generally similar at both levels, despite differences in healthcare approach: use of empiric therapies and clinically guided diagnostic tests, with some differences in colonoscopy use (not always directly accessible from Primary Care). Regarding perceptions, general support and osmotic laxatives are most valued by PC doctors, whereas osmotic laxatives, combined laxatives, and linaclotide are most valued by GE specialists. Furthermore, over half of respondents considered differentiating both diagnoses as challenging. Finally, considerable education needs are self-acknowledged at both levels, as is a demand for guidelines and protocols to help in managing this issue in clinical practice. A strength of this study is its providing a joint photograph of the medical approach and the perceptions of constipation with abdominal discomfort from a medical standpoint. Weaknesses include self-declaration (no formal validation) and a response rate potentially biased by professional motivation.