1 resultado para assessment methods
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (12)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (42)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (3)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (11)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (21)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (23)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (59)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (9)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (17)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (7)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (13)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (10)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (20)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (18)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (9)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (83)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (197)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (59)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (16)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (9)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (17)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (6)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Background: Choosing the method of nutritional assessment is essential for proper follow-up of the nutritional status of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Objectives: Evaluate and compare the nutritional status of cirrhotic patients before and after liver transplantation over a year by different methods of nutritional assessment. Methods: Patients undergoing liver transplantation were assessed in five phases: pre-transplant, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation at the hospital Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. The methods used for nutritional assessment were anthropometry, grip strength of the non-dominant hand (HGS) by dynamometry, thickness of the adductor pollicis muscle (APM) and phase angle (PA) by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In all evaluations, the same measurements were taken. Results: Evaluations were performed in 22 patients. Methods that showed a higher prevalence of malnourished patients before transplantation were PA by BIA (25%), arm muscle circumference (AMC) (21.9%) and arm circumference (AC) (18.8%). When comparing the nutritional status of patients during follow-up, there was a significant difference only in the evaluation methods AC, triceps skinfold thickness and PA by BIA. At the end, the methods of nutritional assessment were compared again. They showed a significant statistical difference, with HGS being the best method for detecting malnutrition. Conclusions: In conclusion, it is suggested that the method PA by BIA could be widely used with this population since the results are consistent with other findings in the literature and they are significant, reliable, and reproducible.