1 resultado para analytical method validation
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (7)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (16)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (18)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (26)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (15)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (22)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (38)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (20)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- Duke University (2)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (49)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (41)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (53)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (123)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (3)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (8)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (6)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (5)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (219)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (22)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (11)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (18)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (10)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Objective: To analyze pharmaceutical interventions that have been carried out with the support of an automated system for validation of treatments vs. the traditional method without computer support. Method: The automated program, ALTOMEDICAMENTOS® version 0, has 925 052 data with information regarding approximately 20 000 medicines, analyzing doses, administration routes, number of days with such a treatment, dosing in renal and liver failure, interactions control, similar drugs, and enteral medicines. During eight days, in four different hospitals (high complexity with over 1 000 beds, 400-bed intermediate, geriatric and monographic), the same patients and treatments were analyzed using both systems. Results: 3,490 patients were analyzed, with 42 155 different treatments. 238 interventions were performed using the traditional system (interventions 0.56% / possible interventions) vs. 580 (1.38%) with the automated one. Very significant pharmaceutical interventions were 0.14% vs. 0.46%; significant was 0.38% vs. 0.90%; non-significant was 0.05% vs. 0.01%, respectively. If both systems are simultaneously used, interventions are performed in 1.85% vs. 0.56% with just the traditional system. Using only the traditional model, 30.5% of the possible interventions are detected, whereas without manual review and only the automated one, 84% of the possible interventions are detected. Conclusions: The automated system increases pharmaceutical interventions between 2.43 to 3.64 times. According to the results of this study the traditional validation system needs to be revised relying on automated systems. The automated program works correctly in different hospitals.