1 resultado para Veja and biased
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (16)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (21)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (50)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (11)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (44)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (33)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (11)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (6)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (23)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (9)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (25)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (36)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (322)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (51)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (16)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (18)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation represent a relevant and common health issue. However, real-world clinical practice includes patients with constipation who may or may not have other abdominal complaints (pain, bloating, abdominal discomfort) with variable frequency. The goal of the present study was to obtain information on the workload entailed by patients with constipation and associated abdominal complaints, predominant clinical behaviors, education needs, and potential daily practice aids both in Primary Care and gastroenterology settings. The clinical behavior of doctors is generally similar at both levels, despite differences in healthcare approach: use of empiric therapies and clinically guided diagnostic tests, with some differences in colonoscopy use (not always directly accessible from Primary Care). Regarding perceptions, general support and osmotic laxatives are most valued by PC doctors, whereas osmotic laxatives, combined laxatives, and linaclotide are most valued by GE specialists. Furthermore, over half of respondents considered differentiating both diagnoses as challenging. Finally, considerable education needs are self-acknowledged at both levels, as is a demand for guidelines and protocols to help in managing this issue in clinical practice. A strength of this study is its providing a joint photograph of the medical approach and the perceptions of constipation with abdominal discomfort from a medical standpoint. Weaknesses include self-declaration (no formal validation) and a response rate potentially biased by professional motivation.