1 resultado para Off-line learning
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (6)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (20)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (7)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (46)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (82)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (26)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (10)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (29)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (22)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (8)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (22)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (3)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (22)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (14)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (5)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (15)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (9)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (13)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (8)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (37)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (12)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (24)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (22)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (11)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (7)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (7)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (17)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Michigan (14)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (224)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Objectives: To develop a procedure for management of off-label medications, and to analyze the treatments, indications, and hospital units which will request them more frequently, as well as which variables will have an impact on the authorization decision, and its economic impact. Methods: A procedure was designed where clinicians would complete request forms and the Hospital Unit would prepare reports assessing their efficacy, safety, convenience, and cost. The request forms for the past five years were analyzed. Results: A total of 834 applications were received, and 88.1% of these were accepted. The authorization rates were higher for Paediatric Units (95.7% vs. 86.6%; p<0.05). The reasons for considering prescriptions as off-label were: different indication (73.2%), different combination (10.2%), different line of treatment (8.6%) and different age (8%). A 73.4% of requests were for antineoplastic drugs, and the most frequently prescribed were rituximab (120) and bevacizumab (103). The quality of evidence supporting the prescriptions was moderate-low, though no direct relationship with the likelihood of approval was demonstrated (p = 0.413). The cost of the approved medications was 8,567,537 , and the theoretical savings for those drugs rejected was of 2,268,642 . There was a statistically significant decrease in the authorization rate (p < 0.05, Student's t test) when spending increased. Conclusions: The responsibility for assessing off-label prescriptions has fallen on the Pharmacy Unit. It has not been demonstrated that the quality of evidence represents a decisive variable for approval of treatment; on the other hand, age and cost have demonstrated a significant impact.