1 resultado para National campaigns of world breastfeeding week
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (23)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (27)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (3)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (31)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (12)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (18)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (6)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (4)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (16)
- Nottingham eTheses (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (13)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (47)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (89)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (6)
- Scielo España (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (4)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (392)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (19)
- University of Washington (1)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation represent a relevant and common health issue. However, real-world clinical practice includes patients with constipation who may or may not have other abdominal complaints (pain, bloating, abdominal discomfort) with variable frequency. The goal of the present study was to obtain information on the workload entailed by patients with constipation and associated abdominal complaints, predominant clinical behaviors, education needs, and potential daily practice aids both in Primary Care and gastroenterology settings. The clinical behavior of doctors is generally similar at both levels, despite differences in healthcare approach: use of empiric therapies and clinically guided diagnostic tests, with some differences in colonoscopy use (not always directly accessible from Primary Care). Regarding perceptions, general support and osmotic laxatives are most valued by PC doctors, whereas osmotic laxatives, combined laxatives, and linaclotide are most valued by GE specialists. Furthermore, over half of respondents considered differentiating both diagnoses as challenging. Finally, considerable education needs are self-acknowledged at both levels, as is a demand for guidelines and protocols to help in managing this issue in clinical practice. A strength of this study is its providing a joint photograph of the medical approach and the perceptions of constipation with abdominal discomfort from a medical standpoint. Weaknesses include self-declaration (no formal validation) and a response rate potentially biased by professional motivation.