1 resultado para Gatekeeper, Neutrality, Objectivity
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (17)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (12)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (17)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (22)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (23)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (23)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (27)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (75)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (6)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (2)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (8)
- Repositório de Administração Pública (REPAP) - Direção-Geral da Qualificação dos Trabalhadores em Funções Públicas (INA), Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (22)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (76)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (12)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (11)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (14)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (17)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (5)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (30)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (14)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (25)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (58)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (53)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Background and Objectives: Schizophrenia is a severe chronic disease. Endpoint variables lack objectivity and the diagnostic criteria have evolved with time. In order to guide the development of new drugs, European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued a guideline on the clinical investigation of medicinal products for the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods: Authors reviewed and discussed the efficacy trial part of the Guideline. Results: The Guideline divides clinical efficacy trials into short-term trials and long-term trials. The short-term three-arm trial is recommended to replace the short-term two-arm active-controlled non-inferiority trial because the latter has sensitivity issues. The Guideline ultimately makes that three-arm trial a superiority trial. The Guideline discusses four types of long-term trial designs. The randomized withdrawal trial design has some disadvantages. Long-term two-arm active-controlled non-inferiority trial is not recommended due to the sensitivity issue. Extension of the short-term trial is only suitable for extension of the short-term two-arm active-controlled superiority trial. The Guideline suggests that a hybrid design of a randomized withdrawal trial incorporated into a long-term parallel trial might be optimal. However, such a design has some disadvantages and might be too complex to be carried out. Authors suggest instead a three-group long-term trial design, which could provide comparison between test drug and active comparator along with comparison between the test drug and placebo. This alternative could arguably be much easier to carry out compared with the hybrid design. Conclusions: The three-group long-term design merits further discussion and evaluation.