1 resultado para GRoVar protocol (Geographic Routing with Variable transmission range)
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (14)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (27)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (12)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (35)
- Boston University Digital Common (9)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (6)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (22)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (20)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (91)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (51)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (7)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (14)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (12)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (109)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (14)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (88)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (144)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (70)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (24)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation represent a relevant and common health issue. However, real-world clinical practice includes patients with constipation who may or may not have other abdominal complaints (pain, bloating, abdominal discomfort) with variable frequency. The goal of the present study was to obtain information on the workload entailed by patients with constipation and associated abdominal complaints, predominant clinical behaviors, education needs, and potential daily practice aids both in Primary Care and gastroenterology settings. The clinical behavior of doctors is generally similar at both levels, despite differences in healthcare approach: use of empiric therapies and clinically guided diagnostic tests, with some differences in colonoscopy use (not always directly accessible from Primary Care). Regarding perceptions, general support and osmotic laxatives are most valued by PC doctors, whereas osmotic laxatives, combined laxatives, and linaclotide are most valued by GE specialists. Furthermore, over half of respondents considered differentiating both diagnoses as challenging. Finally, considerable education needs are self-acknowledged at both levels, as is a demand for guidelines and protocols to help in managing this issue in clinical practice. A strength of this study is its providing a joint photograph of the medical approach and the perceptions of constipation with abdominal discomfort from a medical standpoint. Weaknesses include self-declaration (no formal validation) and a response rate potentially biased by professional motivation.