1 resultado para Drew
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (29)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (6)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (6)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (11)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (454)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (1)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (5)
- Harvard University (4)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (12)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (10)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (5)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (2)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (27)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (4)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (17)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (14)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (55)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (59)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Introduction: The nutrition of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants is aimed at promoting a similar growth to that occurring in the uterus. However, in practice this is difficult to achieve and extrauterine growth restriction is frequent. The current tendency is to avoid this restriction by means of early parenteral and enteral nutrition. Nonetheless, uncertainty about many of the practices related with nutrition has resulted in a great variation in the way it is undertaken. In 2009 and 2011 in our hospital there was an unexpected increase in necrotizing enterocolitis. To check to see whether our nutrition policy was involved, we undertook a systematic review and drew up clinical practice guidelines (CPG) about enteral feeding in VLBW infants. New considerations about the duration of the fortification and the use of probiotics have led to an update of these CPG. Methods: A total of 21 clinical questions were designed dealing with the type of milk, starting age, mode of administration, rate and volume of the increments, fortification, use of probiotics and protocol. After conducting a systematic search of the available evidence, the information was contrasted and summarized in order to draw up the recommendations. The quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were determined from the SIGN scale Comment: These CPG aim to help physicians in their decision making. The protocolized application of well-proven measurements reduces the variation in clinical practice and improves results.