1 resultado para Chemical management of the soil
em Scielo España
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (75)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archive of European Integration (25)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (16)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (23)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (22)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (35)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (41)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (15)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (21)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (15)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (145)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (38)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (27)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (5)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (141)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (9)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (17)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (98)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (19)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation represent a relevant and common health issue. However, real-world clinical practice includes patients with constipation who may or may not have other abdominal complaints (pain, bloating, abdominal discomfort) with variable frequency. The goal of the present study was to obtain information on the workload entailed by patients with constipation and associated abdominal complaints, predominant clinical behaviors, education needs, and potential daily practice aids both in Primary Care and gastroenterology settings. The clinical behavior of doctors is generally similar at both levels, despite differences in healthcare approach: use of empiric therapies and clinically guided diagnostic tests, with some differences in colonoscopy use (not always directly accessible from Primary Care). Regarding perceptions, general support and osmotic laxatives are most valued by PC doctors, whereas osmotic laxatives, combined laxatives, and linaclotide are most valued by GE specialists. Furthermore, over half of respondents considered differentiating both diagnoses as challenging. Finally, considerable education needs are self-acknowledged at both levels, as is a demand for guidelines and protocols to help in managing this issue in clinical practice. A strength of this study is its providing a joint photograph of the medical approach and the perceptions of constipation with abdominal discomfort from a medical standpoint. Weaknesses include self-declaration (no formal validation) and a response rate potentially biased by professional motivation.