Ecología política y economía de la visibilidad de los dispositivos tecnológicos de escala urbana durante el siglo XX Abriendo la caja negra

En paralelo a la superficie cotidiana de la ciudad moderna, discurre otra "ciudad invisible" o "caja negra" tecnológica, que opera, de manera silenciosa e imperceptible, al servicio de los ciudadanos. Paradójicamente, en este espacio invisible, se toman decisiones de la máxima relevancia para la ciudad: en la "caja negra", las ciudades pactan sus relaciones con la naturaleza; a través de ella, se produce la administración y distribución de los recursos que componen su metabolismo urbano. En definitiva, la "caja negra" es el conjunto de las arquitecturas donde se urbaniza la naturaleza, donde ésta pasa a ser ciudad. Y, sin embargo, ha tendido a permanecer invisible. No obstante, en el último tercio del siglo XX, se ha "abierto la caja negra" urbana y lo que era invisible ha dejado de serlo o, al menos, ha alterado su estatuto de visibilidad. El objetivo de esta tesis doctoral es evaluar las repercusiones arquitectónicas, urbanísticas y ecológicas, que conlleva este reciente fenómeno urbano que, desde hace unas décadas, está teniendo lugar en muchas de las ciudades herederas de las grandes reformas urbanas acometidas en las metrópolis europeas durante el siglo XIX, bajo el paradigma simbólico de un proyecto moderno "prometeico" y emancipador. Para abordar dicho análisis, se pondrán en relación dos parámetros urbanos elementales que han tendido a ser estudiados por separado. Por un lado, la "ecología política urbana", es decir, la red de relaciones socio-ecológicas que acontecen en la ciudad. Por otro lado, la "economía de la visibilidad", es decir, las formas de articular lo visible y lo invisible, en relación a los marcos de gobernanza. La intersección entre la "ecología política urbana" y la "economía de la visibilidad" proporciona un marco de análisis efectivo para comprender el fenómeno de la "apertura de la caja negra" y conlleva un cuestionamiento de algunas nociones dominantes en la teoría urbana y arquitectónica clásicas, como la segregación de la naturaleza, las infraestructuras y la sociedad o como las formas tradicionales de explotación ecológica del medio. Además, ofrece un criterio de análisis privilegiado para la comprensión del proceso de deslegitimación (filosófica, arquitectónica, económica, así como desde perspectivas ecológicas, sociales, de género o queer) de los modelos urbanísticos integrales modernos, herederos de los marcos antropocéntricos del siglo XIX. Por último, proporciona algunas herramientas arquitectónicas para afrontar los desafíos ecosistémicos del siglo XXI. A través del estudio de autores relevantes que han analizado esta problemática para la arquitectura, así como del estudio de casos arquitectónicos que han marcado hitos fundamentales en la consolidación urbana de los procesos asociados a la "caja negra", se concluirá que, en términos ecológicos, la ciudad moderna ha movilizado una "ecología política urbana" basada en fórmulas de sometimiento del entorno, a partir de operaciones arquitectónicas y tecnológicas invisibles. En esta tesis doctoral se estudiará la organización arquitectónica de las arquitecturas de la "caja negra" y se evaluará si el fenómeno de la "apertura de la caja negra" puede ser considerado como un síntoma de la alteración en la "ecología política urbana". 'Abriremos la caja negra" para estudiar cómo se integran en el espacio urbano los dispositivos tecnológicos de escala urbana, toda vez éstos han dejado de ser invisibles. Cómo participan, como un actor más, en la configuración de otros marcos de cohabitación, dentro de la ciudad contemporánea. ABSTRACT An 'invisible city' or technological 'black box' runs parallel to the day-to-day surface of modern cities, remaining silent, unnoticed, at the service of the citizenry. Paradoxically, this invisible space is where some of the most relevant decisions concerning the city are made: the 'black box' is where cities agree on their relationships with nature; it is used to manage and distribute the resources that form its urban metabolism. In short, the 'black box' is the collection of architectures where nature is urbanised, where it becomes a city. And in spite of all this, it has mostly remained invisible. Nevertheless, this urban 'black box' was opened during the last third of the 20th century, so what used to be invisible is invisible no more, or at least the laws governing its visibility have been altered. The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to evaluate the architectural, urban planning and ecological repercussions of this recent urban phenomenon that has been taking place for several decades in many of the cities that followed in the footsteps of the large European metropolises of the 19th century, under the symbolic paradigm of a modern 'prometheic' and emancipating project. This analysis shall be done by juxtaposing two basic urban parameters that in general have been studied separately: frstly the ‘urban political ecology', that is, the network of socio-ecological relationships within the city. Secondly, the 'economy of visibility', that is, the way the visible and invisible spheres are structured in relation with the governance frameworks. The intersection between the 'urban political ecology' and the 'economy of visibility' provides an effective analysis framework to understand the phenomenon of the 'opening of the black box'. It entails calling into question some of the predominant notions in classical urban and architectural theory, such as the segregation of nature, infrastructures and society, or the traditional forms of ecological usage of the environment. It also offers an exceptional analysis criterion to understand the discrediting process (from a philosophical, architectural, economic perspective, but also from the point of view of ecology, society, gender or queerness) of modern all-encompassing urban models that draw from the anthropocentric frameworks of the 19th century. Finally, it provides some architectural tools to tackle 21st-century ecosystemic challenges. The study of relevant authors that have analysed these problems for architecture, as well as the study of milestone architectural cases for the urban consolidation of processes associated to the 'black box', shall serve to reach the conclusion that, in ecological terms, modern cities have mobilised an 'urban political ecology' based on formulas of subjugation of the environment, through invisible architectural and technological operations. This thesis shall present an evaluation of whether the phenomenon of the 'opening of the black box' can be considered a symptom of the alteration of the 'urban political ecology'. We shall 'open the black box' to study the integration of the various urbanscale technological devices within the urban landscape, now that they have ceased to be invisible. We shall see how they participate, like any other actor, in the confguration of other cohabitation frameworks within today's cities.

The role of the urban support in the regeneration of vulnerable neighbourhoods

The processes of social and urban segregation have got worse during the last decades. Several studies have deepened into the analysis of the causes and consequences of these processes and have tried to define solutions that beyond eradicating some specific problems, were aimed at the consolidation of sustainable urban environments. This paper presents an approach to the problem of urban inequality based on the concept of urban vulnerability as something that goes beyond the social and economic problems. In exclusion processes it is very important to consider the urban context and the physical and structural conditions not only in each neighborhood but also in the city as a whole. The paper seeks to pose a reflection on the urban support, which is understood in all its complexity and thought to be a key to ensure access and the right to the city of the citizens most in need.

Urbanism and dictatorship: perspectives of the field of urban studies

In 1933 public letter to Wilhelm Furtwängler, Joseph Goebbels synthesized the official understanding of the link between politics, art and society in the early steps of the Third Reich. By assuming the ethos of art, politics acquired a plastic agency to mold its objects —population and the state— as a unified entity in the form of a ‘national-popular community’ (Volksgemeinschaft); in turn, by infusing art with a political valence, it became part of a wider governmental apparatus that reshaped aesthetic discourses and practices. Similar remarks could be made about the ordering of cities and territories in this period. Dictatorial imaginations mobilized urbanism —including urban theory, urban design and planning— as a fundamental tool for social organization. Under their aegis the production of space became a moment in a wider production of society. Many authors suggest that this political-spatial nexus is intrinsic to modernity itself, beyond dictatorial regimes. In this light, I propose to use dictatorial urbanisms as an analytical opportunity to delve into some concealed features of modern urban design and planning. This chapter explores some of these aspects from a theoretical standpoint, focusing on the development of dictatorial planning mentalities and spatial rationalities and drawing links to other historical episodes in order to inscribe the former in a broader genealogy of urbanism. Needless to say, I don’t suggest that we use dictatorships as mere templates to understand modern productions of space. Instead, these cases provide a crude version of some fundamental drives in the operationalization of urbanism as an instrument of social regulation, showing how far the modern imagination of sociospatial orderings can go. Dictatorial urbanisms constituted a set of experiences where many dreams and aspirations of modern planning went to die. But not, as the conventional account would have it, because the former were the antithesis of the latter, but rather because they worked as the excess of a particular orientation of modern spatial governmentalities — namely, their focus on calculation, social engineering and disciplinary spatialities, and their attempt to subsume a wide range of everyday practices under institutional structuration by means of spatial mediations. In my opinion the interest of dictatorial urbanisms lies in their role as key regulatory episodes in a longer history of our urban present. They stand as a threshold between the advent of planning in the late 19th and early 20th century, and its final consolidation as a crucial state instrument after World War II. We need, therefore, to pay attention to these experiences vis-à-vis the alleged ‘normal’ development of the field in contemporary democratic countries in order to develop a full comprehension thereof.