Managing team learning in a Spanish commercial bank

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze how team management affects team-learning activities. Design/methodology/approach – The authors empirically study 68 teams as they operate in the natural business context of a major Spanish bank. Quantitative research utilizing multiple regression analyses is used to test hypotheses. Findings – The leadership behaviour (consideration, initiation of structure) displayed by the team leader plays a key role in facilitating team learning. Team leader behaviour characterised by consideration and in particular by initiation of structure are both positively related to team-learning activities. Cross-training of team members also contributes to team-learning behaviour. Research limitations/implications – A specific setting may limit the generalizability of findings. Further research may accordingly investigate to what extent these results can be generalized to other settings or other aspects of team learning. Practical implications – The leadership style adopted by the team leader, as well as cross-training of members, affect team-learning activities. These results link leadership theory to collective learning in teams and organizations, and suggest ways leaders can contribute to improved learning. Originality/value – The study provides new insight into how management of teams facilitates team-learning activities. While consideration is somewhat related to team learning, initiation of structure as well as cross-training appear as key variables.

Complejidad Esencial: Un argumento por la complementariedad entre ciencia y sensibilidad = Essential Complexity: An argument for complementarity between science and sensibility

Esta investigación recoge un cúmulo de intereses en torno a un modo de generar arquitectura muy específico: La producción de objetos con una forma subyacente no apriorística. Los conocimientos expuestos se apoyan en condiciones del pensamiento reciente que impulsan la ilusión por alimentar la fuente creativa de la arquitectura con otros campos del saber. Los tiempos del conocimiento animista sensible y el conocimiento objetivo de carácter científico son correlativos en la historia pero casi nunca han sido sincrónicos. Representa asimismo un intento por aunar los dos tipos de conocimiento retomando la inercia que ya se presentía a comienzos del siglo XX. Se trata por tanto, de un ensayo sobre la posible anulación de la contraposición entre estos dos mundos para pasar a una complementariedad entre ambos en una sola visión conjunta compartida. Como meta final de esta investigación se presenta el desarrollo de un sistema crítico de análisis para los objetos arquitectónicos que permita una diferenciación entre aquellos que responden a los problemas de manera completa y sincera y aquellos otros que esconden, bajo una superficie consensuada, la falta de un método resolutivo de la complejidad en el presente creativo. La Investigación observa tres grupos de conocimiento diferenciados agrupados en sus capítulos correspondientes: El primer capítulo versa sobre el Impulso Creador. En él se define la necesidad de crear un marco para el individuo creador, aquel que independientemente de las fuerzas sociales del momento presiente que existe algo más allá que está sin resolver. Denominamos aquí “creador rebelde” a un tipo de personaje reconocible a lo largo de la Historia como aquel capaz de reconocer los cambios que ese operan en su presente y que utiliza para descubrir lo nuevo y acercarse algo al origen creativo. En el momento actual ese tipo de personaje es el que intuye o ya ha intuido hace tiempo la existencia de una complejidad creciente no obviable en el pensamiento de este tiempo. El segundo capítulo desarrolla algunas Propiedades de Sistemas de actuación creativa. En él se muestra una investigación que desarrolla un marco de conocimientos científicos muy específicos de nuestro tiempo que la arquitectura, de momento, no ha absorbido ni refleja de manera directa en su manera de crear. Son temas de presencia casi ya mundana en la sociedad pero que se resisten a ser incluidos en los procesos creativos como parte de la conciencia. La mayoría de ellos hablan de precisión, órdenes invisibles, propiedades de la materia o la energía tratados de manera objetiva y apolítica. La meta final supone el acercamiento e incorporación de estos conceptos y propiedades a nuestro mundo sensible unificándolos indisociablemente bajo un solo punto de vista. El último capítulo versa sobre la Complejidad y su capacidad de reducción a lo esencial. Aquí se muestran, a modo de conclusiones, la introducción de varios conceptos para el desarrollo de un sistema crítico hacia la arquitectura de nuestro tiempo. Entre ellos, el de Complejidad Esencial, definido como aquella de carácter inevitable a la hora de responder la arquitectura a los problemas y solicitaciones crecientes a los que se enfrenta en el presente. La Tesis mantiene la importancia de informar sobre la imposibilidad en el estado actual de las cosas de responder de manera sincera con soluciones de carácter simplista y la necesidad, por tanto, de soluciones necesarias de carácter complejo. En este sentido se define asimismo el concepto de Forma Subyacente como herramienta crítica para poder evaluar la respuesta de cada arquitectura y poder tener un sistema y visión crítica sobre lo que es un objeto consistente frente a la situación a la que se enfrenta. Dicha forma subyacente se define como aquella manera de entender conjuntamente y de manera sincrónica aquello que percibimos de manera sensible inseparable de las fuerzas ocultas, creativas, tecnológicas, materiales y energéticas que sustentan la definición y entendimiento de cualquier objeto construido. ABSTRACT This research includes a cluster of interests around a specific way to generate architecture: The production of objects without an a priori underlying form. The knowledge presented is based on current conditions of thought promoting the illusion to feed the creative source of architecture with other fields of knowledge. The sensible animist knowledge and objective scientific knowledge are correlative in history but have rarely been synchronous. This research is also an attempt to combine both types of knowledge to regain the inertia already sensed in the early twentieth century. It is therefore an essay on the annulment of the opposition between these two worlds to move towards complementarities of both in a single shared vision. The ultimate goal of this research is to present the development of a critical analysis system for architectural objects that allows differentiation between those who respond to the problems sincerely and those who hide under an agreed appearance, the lack of a method for solving the complexity of the creative present. The research observes three distinct groups of knowledge contained in their respective chapters: The first chapter deals with the Creative Impulse. In it is defined the need to create a framework for the creative individual who, regardless of the current social forces, forebodes that there is something hidden beyond which is still unresolved. We define the "rebel creator" as a kind of person existing throughout history who is able to recognize the changes operating in its present and use them to discover something new and get closer to the origin of creation. At present, this type of character is the one who intuits the existence of a non obviable increasing complexity in society and thought. The second chapter presents some systems, and their properties, for creative performance. It describes the development of a framework composed of current scientific knowledge that architecture has not yet absorbed or reflected directly in her procedures. These are issues of common presence in society but are still reluctant to be included in the creative processes even if they already belong to the collective consciousness. Most of them talk about accuracy, invisible orders, properties of matter and energy, always treated from an objective and apolitical perspective. The ultimate goal pursues the approach and incorporation of these concepts and properties to the sensible world, inextricably unifying all under a single point of view. The last chapter deals with complexity and the ability to reduce it to the essentials. Here we show, as a conclusion, the introduction of several concepts to develop a critical approach to analyzing the architecture of our time. Among them, the concept of Essential Complexity, defined as one that inevitably arises when architecture responds to the increasing stresses that faces today. The thesis maintains the importance of reporting, in the present state of things, the impossibility to respond openly with simplistic solutions and, therefore, the need for solutions to complex character. In this sense, the concept of Underlying Form is defined as a critical tool to evaluate the response of each architecture and possess a critical system to clarify what is an consistent object facing a certain situation. The underlying form is then defined as a way to synchronously understand what we perceive sensitively inseparable from the hidden forces of creative, technological, material and energetic character that support the definition and understanding of any constructed object.

Analysis and optimization of trajectories for Ballistic Missiles Interception

Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles are capable of placing a nuclear warhead at more than 5,000 km away from its launching base. With the lethal power of a nuclear warhead a whole city could be wiped out by a single weapon causing millions of deaths. This means that the threat posed to any country from a single ICBM captured by a terrorist group or launched by a 'rogue' state is huge. This threat is increasing as more countries are achieving nuclear and advanced launcher capabilities. In order to suppress or at least reduce this threat the United States created the National Missile Defense System which involved, among other systems, the development of long-range interceptors whose aim is to destroy incoming ballistic missiles in their midcourse phase. The Ballistic Missile Defense is a high-profile topic that has been the focus of political controversy lately when the U.S. decided to expand the Ballistic Missile system to Europe, with the opposition of Russia. However the technical characteristics of this system are mostly unknown by the general public. The Interception of an ICBM using a long range Interceptor Missile as intended within the Ground-Based Missile Defense System by the American National Missile Defense (NMD) implies a series of problems of incredible complexity: - The incoming missile has to be detected almost immediately after launch. - The incoming missile has to be tracked along its trajectory with a great accuracy. - The Interceptor Missile has to implement a fast and accurate guidance algorithm in order to reach the incoming missile as soon as possible. - The Kinetic Kill Vehicle deployed by the interceptor boost vehicle has to be able to detect the reentry vehicle once it has been deployed by ICBM, when it offers a very low infrared signature, in order to perform a final rendezvous manoeuvre. - The Kinetic Kill Vehicle has to be able to discriminate the reentry vehicle from the surrounding debris and decoys. - The Kinetic Kill Vehicle has to be able to implement an accurate guidance algorithm in order to perform a kinetic interception (direct collision) of the reentry vehicle, at relative speeds of more than 10 km/s. All these problems are being dealt simultaneously by the Ground-Based Missile Defense System that is developing very complex and expensive sensors, communications and control centers and long-range interceptors (Ground-Based Interceptor Missile) including a Kinetic Kill Vehicle. Among all the technical challenges involved in this interception scenario, this thesis focuses on the algorithms required for the guidance of the Interceptor Missile and the Kinetic Kill Vehicle in order to perform the direct collision with the ICBM. The involved guidance algorithms are deeply analysed in this thesis in part III where conventional guidance strategies are reviewed and optimal guidance algorithms are developed for this interception problem. The generation of a realistic simulation of the interception scenario between an ICBM and a Ground Based Interceptor designed to destroy it was considered as necessary in order to be able to compare different guidance strategies with meaningful results. As a consequence, a highly representative simulator for an ICBM and a Kill Vehicle has been implemented, as detailed in part II, and the generation of these simulators has also become one of the purposes of this thesis. In summary, the main purposes of this thesis are: - To develop a highly representative simulator of an interception scenario between an ICBM and a Kill Vehicle launched from a Ground Based Interceptor. -To analyse the main existing guidance algorithms both for the ascent phase and the terminal phase of the missiles. Novel conclusions of these analyses are obtained. - To develop original optimal guidance algorithms for the interception problem. - To compare the results obtained using the different guidance strategies, assess the behaviour of the optimal guidance algorithms, and analyse the feasibility of the Ballistic Missile Defense system in terms of guidance (part IV). As a secondary objective, a general overview of the state of the art in terms of ballistic missiles and anti-ballistic missile defence is provided (part I).

Monumentalidad y Arquitectura. Tres consideraciones críticas: lo escrito, lo proyectado y lo construido durante el periodo moderno

El origen de esta tesis considera una lectura (quizás) pendiente: definir críticamente a la monumentalidad en el contexto de la arquitectura moderna. La idea de lo monumental durante la modernidad establece parte de la negación enmarcada en un planteamiento más amplio, basado en el rechazo a todo vínculo con la tradición y la historia. Desde el estatismo del monumento como objeto anacrónico, a la instrumentación de la arquitectura como herramienta simbólica, el proceso transformador más importante para la arquitectura durante el siglo XX contaba con algunas señales que nos daban la pauta para imaginar una realidad conformada por matices y desacuerdos fundamentales. La investigación no pretende contar una nueva historia sobre el periodo moderno, aunque irremediablemente se vale de su registro para presentar la discusión. Así, la idea crítica que sostenemos tiene que ver con las posibilidades estructurales y objetivas del discurso arquitectónico. Un discurso que se analiza en función de tres campos diferenciados, designados como: lo escrito, lo proyectado y lo construido en el periodo de estudio. De esta manera, pensamos que se favorecen las posibilidades dimensionales de la crítica y se amplía el sentido narrativo de la linealidad histórica. Para esta trabajo, la monumentalidad constituye una sustancia de estudio que evidencia las contradicciones, inadvertencias y matices necesarios en la articulación de una visión más compleja sobre los acontecimientos. Convencidos de la eficacia de un modelo dialéctico, que define la condición de lo monumental tanto en una valoración positiva (lo propicio, lo útil, lo verdadero, etc.) como negativa (lo falso, lo ostentoso, lo altisonante, etc.); observaremos que las diferencias alrededor del concepto derivan respectivamente en los significados de monumentalidad y monumentalismo. El contraste y la oposición de ideas expuestas a la luz favorece esa pretensión dimensional de la crítica. De los escritos de Sigfried Giedion -y la Nueva Monumentalidad- a Le Corbusier y la construcción de Chandigarh; o de la crítica anti-monumental de Karel Teige, pasando por el proyecto constructivista de Ivan Leonidov; los distintos episodios referidos en el trabajo encuentran sentido y rechazan las probabilidades arbitrarias y confusas de la selección temática. En ese orden, se busca asignar cierto rigor metodológico e incluso geométrico: la estructura propuesta toma el gran "periodo moderno" en dos bloques temporales, primera-modernidad (alrededor de 1910-1935) y tardo-modernidad (aprox. 1935-1960). En la primera parte se analizan una postura -en mayor medida- reactiva a las manifestaciones de esa hipotética condición monumental, mientras que en el segundo caso la postura se transforma y se perfila un nuevo escenario que anticipará ideológicamente parte de la evidente fractura posmoderna. A su vez, los tres registros anunciados previamente se componen de dos capítulos en función del marco temporal descrito; cada capítulo se desarrolla en tres partes que abundan en los aspectos preliminares de la discusión, luego exponen unos puntos centrales y finalmente orientan un posible recuento. El trabajo se complementa con una parte introductoria que fluye sobre definiciones concretas del monumento, el monumentalismo y la monumentalidad; además de que definirá la orientación de la crítica desarrollada. En una última intervención, a manera de conclusión, se reflexiona sobre el salto temporal, ideológico y estético que la posmodernidad representó para el tema de investigación.   Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to consider a (perhaps) pendant issue: to define monumentality by means of critical approach within the modern context of architecture. The idea of what monumental is during modernity establishes a fraction of the "modern typical denial" based on the rejection of any link to tradition and history. From the anachronistic idea of static monuments, to the orchestration of architecture as a symbolic tool, the most important process of the revolution of architecture during the 20th Century had a few signs that allowed us to imagine a reality conformed by fundamental nuances and disagreements. The aim of this research is not to tell a new story about the modern period, although inexorable it takes note of the register to present the discussion. Therefore, the idea of what we expose as criticism has to do with structural and objective possibilities in the architectural discourse. A speech analyzed in response to three differentiated domains designated here as: the written, the projected and the built during the selected time. In that way, we believe the dimensional possibilities of criticism are favored and the narrative sense of historical process is expanded. In terms of this investigation monumentality constitutes a matter of study that leads us to contradictions, unnoticed issues and necessary gray areas in the articulation of a complex vision about depicted events. We are convinced in the efficiency of a dialectical analysis model in order to define the monumental condition both as a positive value (propitious, useful, truthful, etc.) and a negative one (untrue, ostentatious, pompous, etc.); the idea is to show the differences around respective meanings deriving in terms of monumentality and monumentalism. Contrasting information and the opposition of ideas exposed in this light helped to develop the assumption of dimensional criticism. From Sigfried Giedeon's writings -and the New Monumentality- to Le Corbusier and the construction of Chandigarh; and from Karel Teige's anti-monumental criticism going through the revision of Ivan Leonidov's constructivist project; the variety of episodes referred to this work find some sense and reject the probabilities about confusion and arbitrary in the selection of themes. In order to assign some methodological precision and even geometrical criterion, the proposed structure divides the "great modern time" into two historical blocks: first-modernity (circa 1910-1935) and late-modernity (around 1935-1960). The first part analyzes a -mainly- reactive stance towards the hypothetical expressions of monumental condition, whereas in the second block the rejection tends to be transformed and to project a new scenario that will foresee the ideological postmodern fracture. At the same time, the three registers are composed by two chapters each one will operate depending on the described time frame. Each chapter is organized in three subsequent parts: at first explaining preliminary ideas for discussion, second presenting central points and finally orienting a partial recount. The research is complemented with an introductory episode describing specific definitions concerning the concepts of monument, monumentalism and monumentality; and mainly orienting the developed critique. In a final intervention, as a way of conclusion, we reflect on ideological and aesthetic qualities that postmodern time shift represented for this investigation.

Levedad, una propuesta de arquitectura

Lightness fue un término muy popular en el panorama arquitectónico a mediados de los años 90. Contribuyó decisivamente a ello la exposición que, en 1995, el MoMA de Nueva York dedicó a una serie de arquitecturas agrupadas bajo el título Light Construction. Aunque fue el evento más conocido por la institución que lo albergaba, no fue el único que se ocupó entonces de ese aspecto de la arquitectura. En paralelo, durante el otoño de 1995, la Universidad de Columbia dedicó un seminario a la reflexión sobre el vidrio en la arquitectura, desde la modernidad hasta nuestros días. El seminario se denominó The Culture of Glass y la profesora fue Joan Ockman. Un año antes, la serie de eventos promovidos por ANY fijaba su atención en el tema de la levedad, y le dedicaba en exclusiva el número 5 de su revista ANY Magazine bajo el título Lightness. Estos tres acercamientos -aunque complementarios- parecían solamente rodear el centro de una propuesta arquitectónica que se intuía vinculada a la levedad. Una vista atrás permite descubrir dos elementos más que amplían el marco de esta búsqueda aportando las miradas de uno de los maestros españoles sobre el estado actual de la arquitectura y de un filósofo que se embarca nada menos que en arriesgar a crear un espacio postmoderno. La primera de estas miradas atañe al ámbito universitario. Se trata de la conferencia del profesor Sáenz de Oíza para inaugurar el curso académico 1991-92 en la E.T.S.A.M. La segunda, más lejana en el tiempo, pero fundamental para comprender la idea que se propone sobre la levedad, es la manifestación Les Immatériaux, celebrada en 1985 en el Centre Georges Pompidou de París y comisariada por J.F.Lyotard. Estos cinco eventos delimitan un marco de referencia temporal y conceptual en el que es posible caracterizar y diferenciar un concepto de levedad propio de la arquitectura contemporánea. La búsqueda de este concepto, de lo que lo hace propio de esta época, ayudará a diferenciarlo de las aproximaciones a la levedad en arquitecturas pasadas, fundamentalmente de la modernidad clásica y la postmodernidad. También permitirá aflorar el pensamiento sobre la arquitectura en relación con la obra de arte, no como objeto estético, sino como objeto que pone en cuestión nuestra mirada y nuestro conocimiento del mundo. Por tanto, alejado de estilos o meras soluciones técnicas. El campo de la levedad ya no se reduce a la oposición entre lo ligero y lo pesado, como podría corresponder a una interpretación moderna, sino que adquiere otros matices relacionados con la vista, el equilibrio o el movimiento de un cuerpo que se convierte en intermediario de la experiencia. La búsqueda de esta forma de levedad en arquitecturas construidas nos ayudará a entender los aspectos que la caracterizan y que siempre se enlazan bajo la forma de un trabajo sutil sobre el soporte de la arquitectura, cuestionando lo que entendíamos por estable. ABSTRACT Lightness was a popular term in the architectural scene in the mid nineties. The exhibition that MoMa in New York devoted to a number of architectures gathered under the title Light Construction, in 1995, was a decisive contribution to it. Although it was the best known event thanks to the institution that hosted it, it was not the only one that dealt with that aspect of architecture. In parallel, during the autumn of 1995, Columbia University dedicated a seminar to the reflection about glass in architecture, from modernity up to now. The seminar was called The Culture of Glass and the professor was Joan Ockman. A year earlier, the series of events promoted by ANY focused on the subject of lightness, and the number 5 of the magazine ANY Magazine was exclusively dedicated to it under the title Lightness. These three approaches –although complementary- only seemed to surround the core of an architectural proposal that appeared to be linked to lightness. A look back allows for discovering two more elements that broaden the framework of this search contributing the views of one of the Spanish masters on the current architecture status and a philosopher who gets involved in no less than to create a postmodern space. The first of these views concerns university scope. It is the lecture by Professor Sáenz de Oíza to inaugurate the academic year 1991-92 at the E.T.S.A.M. The second, far off in time, but critical to understand the proposal initially guessed, is the manifestation Les Immatériaux, held in 1985 at the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris and curated by J.F.Lyotard. These five events define a temporal and conceptual reference framework in which it is possible to characterize and differentiate a lightness concept belonging to contemporary architecture. The search of this concept, of what may have related to present time, helps to differentiate it from the approaches to the lightness in past architectures, mainly of classical modernism and postmodernism. It will also allow for emerging the thinking about architecture in relation to the work of art, not as an aesthetic object, but as an object that question our view and our knowledge of the world. Therefore, far from styles or mere technical solutions. The field of lightness is no longer limited to the opposition between light and heavy, as may correspond to a modern interpretation, but acquires other nuances related to sight, balance or movement of a body that becomes an intermediary of experience. The search for this kind of lightness in built architecture will help us to understand, by the way shown, the aspects that define it and that are always linked: the subtle work on the architectural support that leads us to question ourselves about what we understand as stable.

Jacques Tati : vivienda experimental y espacio de trabajo a mediados del siglo XX

La obra fílmica del director francés Jacques Tati podría considerarse como el perfecto reflejo del paradigma edificatorio de mediados del siglo XX en plena posguerra europea, una época ávida de transformaciones de las que el cine supo hacerse eco. Particularmente, el cine de Tati refleja las preocupaciones del ciudadano europeo de posguerra sobre las consecuencias de las masivas construcciones erigidas en sus devastados núcleos urbanos y la puesta en práctica de la ciudad funcional propuesta por la Carta de Atenas (1931). Pero, además, el análisis del cine de Jacques Tati permite un acercamiento a la modernidad desde diversos puntos de vista como la movilidad, el diseño urbano, las nuevas construcciones, los espacios de trabajo en los nuevos distritos terciarios, la vivienda -tradicional, moderna y experimental- o el diseño mobiliario en la posguerra. A través de su alter ego -Monsieur Hulot- Tati interacciona curioso con las nuevas construcciones geométricas de paños neutros y cuestiona su ruptura con la tradición edificatoria francesa, enfatizando la oposición entre el pasado nostálgico y la modernidad de las décadas de los 50 y 60, salpicadas por el consumismo feroz del recién estrenado estado de bienestar. La confrontación funcional, volumétrica, estética e incluso cromática entre ambos mundos construidos –el tradicional y el moderno- invita al espectador a un ejercicio de reflexión y crítica sobre la arquitectura moderna de este período en Europa. En particular, la mirada cinematográfica de Tati se centra en dos conceptos fundamentales. Por una parte, su atención se dirige a la famosa casa mecanicista Le Corbuseriana materializada en la ultra-moderna casa Arpel (Mon Oncle, 1958) y proyectada en la misma época en la que se desarrollaban importantes prototipos de vivienda experimental como la Casa de Futuro de Alison y Peter Smithson o las viviendas de Jean Prouvé. Debe ponerse de manifiesto que la crítica de Jacques Tati no se centraba en la arquitectura moderna en sí misma sino en el empleo erróneo que los usuarios pudieran hacer de ella. Por otro lado, Tati centra su atención en el prisma miesiano a través de los bloques de oficinas que conforman la ciudad de Tativille en Playtime (1967). Se trataba de una gran ciudad moderna construida explícitamente para el rodaje de la película y basada en los casi idénticos tejidos urbanos residenciales y terciarios ya en funcionamiento en las principales capitales europeas y norteamericanas en aquellos años. Tativille funcionaría como una ciudad autónoma disponiendo de diversas instalaciones y con el objetivo de integrarse y consolidarse en la trama urbana parisina. Lamentablemente, su destino al final del rodaje fue bien distinto. En definitiva, el análisis de la producción fílmica de Jacques Tati permite un acercamiento a la arquitectura y al urbanismo modernos de posguerra y al contexto socio-económico que favoreció su crecimiento y expansión. Por ello, su obra constituye una herramienta visual muy útil que aún hoy es consultada y mostrada por su claridad y humor y que invita a los ciudadanos –telespectadores- a participar en un ejercicio crítico arquitectónico hasta entonces reservado a los arquitectos. ABSTRACT The film work of French director Jacques Tati could be considered as the perfect reflection of the mid-20th century European post-war building paradigm, a period of time plenty of transformations perfectly echoed by cinema. In particular, Tati’s film work reflects the European post-war citizen’s concerns about the consequences of massive constructions built in their desvastated urban centres, as well as the development of functional cities proposed by the Athens Charter (1931). But, on top of that, an analysis of Jacques Tati’s cinematography allows for an approach to modernity from different perspectives, such as mobility, urban design, new buildings, working spaces in the new tertiary districts, housing -traditional, modern, and experimental-, or furniture design during the post-war period. Embodied by his alter-ego –Monsieur Hulot,- Tati curiously interacts with the new geometric constructions of neutral facades and questions the break with the French building tradition, highlighting the opposition between the nostalgic past and modernity of the 50s and 60s, affected by the fierce consumerism of the new welfare state. The functional, volumetric, aesthetic and even chromatic confrontation between both built worlds –traditional vs modern- invites the viewer to an exercise of meditation and criticism on the European modern architecture of that period. Tati’s film look is particularly focused on two basic concepts: on the one hand, his attention addresses Le Corbusier’s famous mechanistic house which is materialized in the ultra-modern Arpel house (Mon Oncle, 1958) and designed, in turn, when the development of other important experimental dwelling prototypes like Alison and Peter Smithson’s House of the Future or Jean Prouvé´s houses was taking place. It must be highlighted that Jacques Tati’s criticism was not addressed to modern architecture itself but to the wrong use that citizens could make of it. On the other hand, Tati focuses on the Miesian prism through the office buildings that shape the city of Tativille in Playtime (1967). It was a big, modern city built specifically for the film shooting, and based on the almost identical residential and tertiary urban fabrics already active in the main European and American capitals those years. Tativille would work as an autonomous city, having several facilities at its disposal and with the goal of getting integrated and consolidated into the Parisian urban weave. However, its final use was, unfortunately, quite different. In conclusion, an analysis of Jacques Tati’s film production allows for an approach to modern post-war architecture and urbanism, as well as to the socio-economic context that favoured its growth and expansion. As a result of this, Jacques Tati’s film production constitutes a suitable visual tool which, even nowadays, is consulted and shown due to its clarity and humour, and at the same time invites citizens –viewers- to participate in an architectural criticism exercise that, so far, had been reserved to architects.

How has Spain become a leader in the wind energy industry during the last decade?

During the last decade, wind energy has been the fastest growing renewable source of energy worldwide. Limited sources of fossil fuel in addition to the negative effects of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment have led many countries to support development of renewable energies such as wind energy. Spain as the fourth biggest producer of wind energy plays an important global role in wind industry. In this paper, some important factors in the rapid growth of wind energy in Spain such as policy design, industry and technology, economic environment and social acceptance have been studied. The objective of this study is to introduce a model based on the successful development of wind energy in Spain which can be implemented by other countries