Territory and the governmentalisation of social reproduction: parliamentary enclosure and spatial rationalities in the transition from feudalism to capitalism

Recent applications of Foucauldian categories in geography, spatial history and the history of town planning have opened up interesting new perspectives, with respect to both the evolution of spatial knowledge and the genealogy of territorial techniques and their relation to larger socio-political projects, that would be enriched if combined with other discursive traditions. This article proposes to conceptualise English parliamentary enclosureea favourite episode for Marxist historiography, frequently read in a strictly materialist fashioneas a precedent of a new form of sociospatial governmentality, a political technology that inaugurates a strategic manipulation of territory for social change on the threshold between feudal and capitalist spatial rationalities. I analyse the sociospatial dimensions of parliamentary enclosure’s technical and legal innovations and compare them to the forms of communal self-regulation of land use customs and everyday regionalisations that preceded it. Through a systematic, replicable mechanism of reterritorialisation, enclosure acts normalised spatial regulations, blurred regional differences in the social organisation of agriculture and erased the modes of autonomous social reproduction linked to common land. Their exercise of dispossession of material resources, social capital and community representations is interpreted therefore as an inaugural logic that would pervade the emergent spatial rationality later known as planning.

Identificación y evaluación de la creación de valor mediante la implantación y desarrollo de políticas de responsabilidad social corporativa estratégica

La Responsabilidad Social Corporativa (RSC) sigue constituyendo en la actualidad un área de estudio de elevado interés tanto para la comunidad académica como para los negocios en general. A pesar del gran número de investigaciones realizadas en las pasadas décadas sobre los distintos aspectos que la caracterizan, y la definición generalizada de políticas relacionadas en las compañías más importantes, existen todavía algunos asuntos clave sobre los que se plantean interrogantes fundamentales. La complejidad asociada al constructo RSC y su carácter intrínsecamente dinámico explican en parte esta afirmación. En su aplicación práctica, las dudas sobre la RSC se enfocan hoy en día hacia su implantación con carácter permanente en el día a día de las organizaciones, la relevancia estratégica de las principales iniciativas, o la posibilidad de obtención de beneficios a medio y largo plazo. Se observa de esta forma la traslación de los debates principales hacia las consecuencias más estratégicas de dichas políticas, influenciados por prestigiosos estudios académicos en los que se caracteriza la denominada RSC Estratégica (RSCE), y por las principales organizaciones de certificación de memorias anuales de RSC y sostenibilidad. En este contexto se sitúa el objeto principal de esta investigación, consistente en el diseño de un modelo de implantación de RSCE que permita no sólo identificar los factores más importantes a tener en consideración para su éxito, sino para caracterizar las potenciales formas de creación de valor que pueden surgir de la aplicación del mismo. Se argumenta la elección del tema por considerarse que los asuntos asociados a la RSC no están lo suficientemente explorados desde la visión estratégica más actual, y por constituir la creación de valor el objetivo más crítico dentro de los procesos directivos de planificación estratégica. De esta forma, se utilizan dos metodologías para destacar qué factores son esenciales en la implantación de la RSCE, con qué fines las compañías aplican esas políticas, y qué resultados obtienen como consecuencia: análisis comparativo de casos de estudio y análisis estadístico cuantitativo. Los casos de estudio analizan en profundidad políticas globales de RSCE bajo diferentes puntos de vista, para derivar conclusiones sobre los factores que facilitan u obstaculizan su implantación permanente en las organizaciones. Su desarrollo se estructura en torno a un marco conceptual de referencia obtenido a través de la revisión bibliográfica específica, y se complementa con la información primaria y secundaria de investigación. Por su parte, el análisis cuantitativo se desarrolla mediante tres técnicas exploratorias: estadística descriptiva, regresión múltiple y análisis de componentes principales. Su aplicación combinada va a posibilitar el contraste de aspectos destacados en los análisis de casos, así como la configuración final del modelo de implantación, y la expresión numérica de la creación de valor a través de la RSCE en función de las dimensiones estratégicas consideradas. En consecuencia, los resultados de la tesis se estructuran alrededor de tres preguntas de investigación: ¿cómo se están produciendo y qué caracterización presentan los beneficios que resultan como consecuencia de la implantación de la RSCE en los procesos de planificación estratégica de las compañías?, ¿qué factores esenciales y característicos de la RSCE pueden resultar críticos en los procesos de implantación y futuro desarrollo?, y ¿qué importancia puede tener en el medio y largo plazo el poder de decisión de compra de los consumidores y usuarios finales en la implantación y desarrollo de políticas de RSCE? ABSTRACT Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) remains a study area of high interest today to both the academic community and businesses in general. Despite the large number of investigations of various aspects of CSR in past decades, and its generalized consideration by the world’s most important companies, there are still some key issues and fundamental questions to resolve. The complexity associated with the CSR construct and its inherently dynamic character, partly explains this statement. In its practical application, doubts about CSR arise today about its permanent implementation in normal business activities, the strategic relevance of related policies, and the possibility of making profits in the medium and long term. It is observed in this way the translation of the main debates towards the more strategic consequences of these policies, influenced by prestigious academic studies that characterize the so-called Strategic CSR (SCSR), and by leading certification agencies of CSR and sustainability reports. In this context, the main purpose of this investigation is to design a model of SCSR for implementation that allows one to not only identify the most important factors to consider for SCSR success, but also to characterize potential forms of value creation that can arise from its application. The selection of this research approach is justified because it is believed that important issues that are associated with CSR have not been sufficiently explored from the aspect of the strategic vision in the current context, and because value creation constitutes the most critical objective within the strategic planning steering processes. Thus, two methods are used to highlight which factors are essential in SCSR implementation processes, the end to which companies apply these policies, and the kind of results that they expect. These methods are: comparative analysis of case studies and quantitative statistical analysis. The case studies discuss in depth SCSR global policies under different perspectives to draw conclusions about the factors that facilitate or hinder permanent implantation in organizations. Their development is structured around a conceptual framework that is obtained by review of specific literature, and is complemented by primary and secondary research information. On the other hand, quantitative analysis is developed by means of three exploratory techniques: descriptive statistics, multiple regression and principal component analysis. Their combined application facilitates a contrast of highlighted aspects in analyzing cases, the final configuration of the implementation model, and the numerical expression of value creation by SCSR as a consequence of the strategic dimensions considered by companies. Finally, the results of the thesis are structured around three research questions: what are the benefits that result from the implementation of SCSR policies in companies’ strategic planning processes?, which essential SCSR factors are potentially critical in the implementation and future development of companies’ processes?, and how decisive in the medium and long term will be the purchase decision power of consumers to the success of SCSR policies?

Perspectives on climate change and human development in the Mediterranean agriculture

The Mediterranean region is one of the world's climate change hotspots. Future climate projections envisage dramatic implications for the agricultural and water sectors that will endanger economic development and lead to natural resources degradation and social instability.

El papel de las Administraciones Públicas en el Social Media.

La razón de estudio del proyecto que continúa es comprobar el nivel de interacción presente entre las Administraciones Públicas y los Medios Sociales en la actualidad. El estudio se realiza desde dos perspectivas distintas: la interacción actual entre ambos y cómo puede ir más allá para conseguir la gestión electrónica de la Administración Pública (el e-Gobierno. En la interacción actual, el estudio se realiza en distintos niveles, partiendo desde la Administración Pública de la Unión Europea para, posteriormente, entrar en la española. En esta última se comprueba a distintos niveles: o Administración Central o Administración Autonómica o Administración Provincial o Administración Municipal Este estudio se realiza desde dos perspectivas. Por un lado desde el papel como regulador que toma la Administración Pública en los contenidos publicas en los Medios Sociales y cómo actúa en caso de que no sean adecuados o violen leyes. La otra perspectiva es cómo, la Administración Pública, ejerce de usuario tradicional de los Medios Sociales. Los datos presentados van desde qué plataformas son las más utilizadas, cuál es la temática de los mensajes o cómo influyen estos dos elementos en los propios mensajes. Acercando el concepto de e-Gobierno al lector se presenta una serie de pautas para usar de manera más ventajosa los Medios Sociales. Para finalizar el proyecto y hacer uso de lo analizado con anterioridad se presenta la idea de implantación de un e-Gobierno en el Ministerio de Alimentación, Agricultura y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA) de España. Esta idea abarca el uso de Medios Sociales, ya sean propietarios o los ya creados, tanto de cara al interior del Ministerio como hacia el exterior. De esta forma se analiza las conexiones que tiene el Ministerio con otras entidades de la Administración Pública,con empresas o ciudadanos. ABSTRACT: The reason for the study of this project is to test the level of interaction between government and Social Media today. The study was carried out from two different perspectives: the current interaction between the two and how can go further to get the electronic management of the Public Administration (e-Government.In the current interaction, the study is performed at various levels, starting from the Public Administration of the European Union. Later the study continues in the Public Administration of Spain, in different levels. o Central Administration o Regional Administration o Provincial Administration o Municipal Administration This study is conducted from two perspectives. On the one hand from the role as a regulator that takes the government as public content on Social Media and how it works if not suitable or violate laws. The other perspective is how, Public Administration, holds traditional user of SocialMedia. The data presented are from what platforms are the most used, what is the theme of the messages or how to influence these two elements in the messages.Bringing the concept of e-government presents to the reader a series of guidelines to use more advantageously Social Media. To finish the project and use the analyzed previously presented, the idea of implementing an e-Government in the Ministerio de Alimentación, Agricultura y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA) of Spain. This idea embraces the use of social media, whether owners or those already created,both within the Ministry face as outward. This analyzes the connections it has with other entities of Public Administration, companies or citizens.

Territory and the governmentalisation of social reproduction: parliamentary enclosure and spatial rationalities in the transition from feudalism to capitalism

Recent applications of Foucauldian categories in geography, spatial history and the history of town planning have opened up interesting new perspectives, with respect to both the evolution of spatial knowledge and the genealogy of territorial techniques and their relation to larger socio-political projects, that would be enriched if combined with other discursive traditions. This article proposes to conceptualise English parliamentary enclosureea favourite episode for Marxist historiography, frequently read in a strictly materialist fashioneas a precedent of a new form of sociospatial governmentality, a political technology that inaugurates a strategic manipulation of territory for social change on the threshold between feudal and capitalist spatial rationalities. I analyse the sociospatial dimensions of parliamentary enclosure’s technical and legal innovations and compare them to the forms of communal self-regulation of land use customs and everyday regionalisations that preceded it. Through a systematic, replicable mechanism of reterritorialisation, enclosure acts normalised spatial regulations, blurred regional differences in the social organisation of agriculture and erased the modes of autonomous social reproduction linked to common land. Their exercise of dispossession of material resources, social capital and community representations is interpreted therefore as an inaugural logic that would pervade the emergent spatial rationality later known as planning.

Urbanism and dictatorship: perspectives of the field of urban studies

In 1933 public letter to Wilhelm Furtwängler, Joseph Goebbels synthesized the official understanding of the link between politics, art and society in the early steps of the Third Reich. By assuming the ethos of art, politics acquired a plastic agency to mold its objects —population and the state— as a unified entity in the form of a ‘national-popular community’ (Volksgemeinschaft); in turn, by infusing art with a political valence, it became part of a wider governmental apparatus that reshaped aesthetic discourses and practices. Similar remarks could be made about the ordering of cities and territories in this period. Dictatorial imaginations mobilized urbanism —including urban theory, urban design and planning— as a fundamental tool for social organization. Under their aegis the production of space became a moment in a wider production of society. Many authors suggest that this political-spatial nexus is intrinsic to modernity itself, beyond dictatorial regimes. In this light, I propose to use dictatorial urbanisms as an analytical opportunity to delve into some concealed features of modern urban design and planning. This chapter explores some of these aspects from a theoretical standpoint, focusing on the development of dictatorial planning mentalities and spatial rationalities and drawing links to other historical episodes in order to inscribe the former in a broader genealogy of urbanism. Needless to say, I don’t suggest that we use dictatorships as mere templates to understand modern productions of space. Instead, these cases provide a crude version of some fundamental drives in the operationalization of urbanism as an instrument of social regulation, showing how far the modern imagination of sociospatial orderings can go. Dictatorial urbanisms constituted a set of experiences where many dreams and aspirations of modern planning went to die. But not, as the conventional account would have it, because the former were the antithesis of the latter, but rather because they worked as the excess of a particular orientation of modern spatial governmentalities — namely, their focus on calculation, social engineering and disciplinary spatialities, and their attempt to subsume a wide range of everyday practices under institutional structuration by means of spatial mediations. In my opinion the interest of dictatorial urbanisms lies in their role as key regulatory episodes in a longer history of our urban present. They stand as a threshold between the advent of planning in the late 19th and early 20th century, and its final consolidation as a crucial state instrument after World War II. We need, therefore, to pay attention to these experiences vis-à-vis the alleged ‘normal’ development of the field in contemporary democratic countries in order to develop a full comprehension thereof.