Gobernar la complejidad urbana desde la sostenibilidad. Evaluación del gobierno de la gestión visible utilizando indicadores de gobernanza (Venezuela)

Se evalúa con indicadores de gobernanza urbana la sostenibilidad de las formas de hacer ciudad hibrida compleja del gobierno de la gestión visible (GGV). Argumenta que el GGV hace ciudad para legitimarse por desempeño y fortalecer la gobernanza local, en un contexto de mutaciones múltiples y radicales que tienden a diluir y centralizar el poder local y fractalizar la ciudad, profundizando la segregación sociopolítica-territorial y la ingobernabilidad genética de la ciudad hibrida, poniendo en riesgo el Estado federal descentralizado, el derecho a la ciudad, al gobierno local y la gobernanza urbana y multinivel (hipótesis). La estrategia de evaluación de gobernanza innovadora (EEG+i) diseñada para evaluar la relación entre las formas de hacer ciudad hibrida (variables espaciales) y gobernanza (variable a-espacial) es transversal, multidimensional y se construye desde la complejidad, el análisis de escenarios, formulación de constructos, modelos e indicadores de gobernanza, entretejiendo tres campos de conocimiento, gobierno, ciudad y sostenibilidad, en cuatro fases. La Fase 1, contextualiza la gobernanza en la dramática del siglo XXI. La Fase 2, desarrolla la fundamentación teórico-práctica, nuevos conceptos y un abordaje analítico propio ‘genética territorial’, para analizar y comprehender la complejidad de la ciudad hibrida de países en desarrollo, tejiendo ontogenética territorial y el carácter autopoiético del gen informal. En la Fase 3, se caracterizan las formas de hacer ciudad desde la genética del territorio, se formulan modelos e indicadores de gobernanza con los que se evalúan, aplicando un delphi y cuestionarios, los genes tipológicos-formas de hacer ciudad y validan las conclusiones. En la Fase 4, se correlacionan los resultados de los instrumentos aplicados con la praxis urbana del GGV, durante cuatro periodos de gobierno (1996-2010). Concluyendo que, la estrategia de evaluación comprobó las hipótesis y demostró la correlación transversal y multinivel existente entre, las mutaciones en curso que contradicen el modelo de gobernanza constitucional, el paisaje de gobernanza latinoamericano y venezolano, la praxis de los regímenes híbridos ricos en recursos naturales, las perspectivas de desarrollo globales y se expresa sociopolíticamente en déficit de gobernanza, Estado de derecho y cohesión-capital social y, espaciolocalmente, en la ciudad hibrida dispersa y diluida (compleja) y en el gobierno del poder diluido centralizado. La confrontación de flujos de poder centrípetos y centrífugos en la ciudad profundiza la fragmentación socioespacial y política y el deterioro de la calidad de vida, incrementando las protestas ciudadanas e ingobernabilidad que obstaculiza la superación de la pobreza y gobernanza urbana y multinivel. La evaluación de la praxis urbana del GGV evidenció que la correlación entre gobernanza, la producción de genes formales y la ciudad por iniciativa privada tiende a ser positiva y entre gobernanza, genes y producción de ciudad informal negativa, por el carácter autopoiético-autogobernable del gen informal y de los nuevos gobiernos sublocales que dificulta gobernar en gobernanza. La praxis del GGV es contraria al modelo de gobernanza formulado y la disolución centralizada del gobierno local y de la ciudad hibrida-dispersa es socio-espacial y políticamente insostenible. Se proponen estrategias y tácticas de gobernanza multinivel para recuperar la cohesión social y de planificación de la gestión innovadora (EG [PG] +i) para orquestar, desde el Consejo Local de Gobernanza (CLG) y con la participación de los espacios y gobiernos sublocales, un proyecto de ciudad compartido y sostenible. ABSTRACT The sustainability of the forms of making the hybrid-complex city by the visible management government (VMG) is evaluated using urban governance indicators. Argues that the VMG builds city to legitimate itself by performance and to strengthen local governance in a context of multiple and radical mutations that tend to dilute and centralize local power and fractalize the city, deepening the socio-spatial and political segregation, the genetic ingovernability of the hybrid city and placing the decentralized federal State, the right to city, local government and urban governance at risk (hypothesis). The innovative governance evaluation strategy (GES+i) designed to assess the relationship between the forms of making the hybrid city (spatial variables) and governance (a-spatial variable) is transversal, multidimensional; is constructed from complexity, scenario analysis, the formulation of concepts, models and governance indicators, weaving three fields of knowledge, government, city and sustainability in four phases. Phase 1, contextualizes governance in the dramatic of the twenty-first century. Phase 2, develops the theoretical and practical foundations, new concepts and a proper analytical approach to comprehend the complexity of the hybrid city from developing countries, weaving territorial ontogenetic with the autopiethic character of the informal city gen. In Phase 3, the ways of making city are characterized from the genetics of territory; governance indicators and models are formulated to evaluate, using delphi and questionnaires, the ways of making city and validate the conclusions. In Phase 4, the results of the instruments applied are correlated with the urban praxis of the VMG during the four periods of government analyzed (1996-2010). Concluding that, the evaluation strategy proved the hypothesis and showed the transversal and multilevel correlation between, mutations that contradict the constitutional governance model, the governance landscape of Latinamerica and the country, the praxis of the hybrid regimes rich in natural resources, the perspectives of the glocal economy and expresses socio-politically the governance and rule of law and social capital-cohesion deficit and spatial-temporarily the hybrid disperse and diluted city (complex) and the diluted-centralized local government. The confrontation of flows of power centripetal and centrifugal in the city deepens the socio-spatial and political fragmentation and deterioration of the quality of life, increasing citizens' protests and ingovernability which hinders poverty eradication and, multilevel and urban governance. The evaluation of the VMG urban praxis showed the correlation between governance, the production of formal genes and city by private initiative tended to be positive and, between informal genes-city production and governance negative, due to its autopiethic-self governable character that hinders governance. The urban praxis of the VMG contradicts the formulated governance model and thecentralized dissolution of the local government and hybrid city are socio-spatial and politically unsustainable. Multiscale governance strategies are proposed to recreate social cohesion and a management planning innovative method (EG [PG] + i) to orchestrate, from the Local Governance Council (LGC) and with the participation of sublocal governments and spaces, a shared and sustainable city project.

Análisis y modelización de la dinámica emergente durante el proceso de difusión de información en las redes sociales de internet

Durante la actividad diaria, la sociedad actual interactúa constantemente por medio de dispositivos electrónicos y servicios de telecomunicaciones, tales como el teléfono, correo electrónico, transacciones bancarias o redes sociales de Internet. Sin saberlo, masivamente dejamos rastros de nuestra actividad en las bases de datos de empresas proveedoras de servicios. Estas nuevas fuentes de datos tienen las dimensiones necesarias para que se puedan observar patrones de comportamiento humano a grandes escalas. Como resultado, ha surgido una reciente explosión sin precedentes de estudios de sistemas sociales, dirigidos por el análisis de datos y procesos computacionales. En esta tesis desarrollamos métodos computacionales y matemáticos para analizar sistemas sociales por medio del estudio combinado de datos derivados de la actividad humana y la teoría de redes complejas. Nuestro objetivo es caracterizar y entender los sistemas emergentes de interacciones sociales en los nuevos espacios tecnológicos, tales como la red social Twitter y la telefonía móvil. Analizamos los sistemas por medio de la construcción de redes complejas y series temporales, estudiando su estructura, funcionamiento y evolución en el tiempo. También, investigamos la naturaleza de los patrones observados por medio de los mecanismos que rigen las interacciones entre individuos, así como medimos el impacto de eventos críticos en el comportamiento del sistema. Para ello, hemos propuesto modelos que explican las estructuras globales y la dinámica emergente con que fluye la información en el sistema. Para los estudios de la red social Twitter, hemos basado nuestros análisis en conversaciones puntuales, tales como protestas políticas, grandes acontecimientos o procesos electorales. A partir de los mensajes de las conversaciones, identificamos a los usuarios que participan y construimos redes de interacciones entre los mismos. Específicamente, construimos una red para representar quién recibe los mensajes de quién y otra red para representar quién propaga los mensajes de quién. En general, hemos encontrado que estas estructuras tienen propiedades complejas, tales como crecimiento explosivo y distribuciones de grado libres de escala. En base a la topología de estas redes, hemos indentificado tres tipos de usuarios que determinan el flujo de información según su actividad e influencia. Para medir la influencia de los usuarios en las conversaciones, hemos introducido una nueva medida llamada eficiencia de usuario. La eficiencia se define como el número de retransmisiones obtenidas por mensaje enviado, y mide los efectos que tienen los esfuerzos individuales sobre la reacción colectiva. Hemos observado que la distribución de esta propiedad es ubicua en varias conversaciones de Twitter, sin importar sus dimensiones ni contextos. Con lo cual, sugerimos que existe universalidad en la relación entre esfuerzos individuales y reacciones colectivas en Twitter. Para explicar los factores que determinan la emergencia de la distribución de eficiencia, hemos desarrollado un modelo computacional que simula la propagación de mensajes en la red social de Twitter, basado en el mecanismo de cascadas independientes. Este modelo nos permite medir el efecto que tienen sobre la distribución de eficiencia, tanto la topología de la red social subyacente, como la forma en que los usuarios envían mensajes. Los resultados indican que la emergencia de un grupo selecto de usuarios altamente eficientes depende de la heterogeneidad de la red subyacente y no del comportamiento individual. Por otro lado, hemos desarrollado técnicas para inferir el grado de polarización política en redes sociales. Proponemos una metodología para estimar opiniones en redes sociales y medir el grado de polarización en las opiniones obtenidas. Hemos diseñado un modelo donde estudiamos el efecto que tiene la opinión de un pequeño grupo de usuarios influyentes, llamado élite, sobre las opiniones de la mayoría de usuarios. El modelo da como resultado una distribución de opiniones sobre la cual medimos el grado de polarización. Aplicamos nuestra metodología para medir la polarización en redes de difusión de mensajes, durante una conversación en Twitter de una sociedad políticamente polarizada. Los resultados obtenidos presentan una alta correspondencia con los datos offline. Con este estudio, hemos demostrado que la metodología propuesta es capaz de determinar diferentes grados de polarización dependiendo de la estructura de la red. Finalmente, hemos estudiado el comportamiento humano a partir de datos de telefonía móvil. Por una parte, hemos caracterizado el impacto que tienen desastres naturales, como innundaciones, sobre el comportamiento colectivo. Encontramos que los patrones de comunicación se alteran de forma abrupta en las áreas afectadas por la catástofre. Con lo cual, demostramos que se podría medir el impacto en la región casi en tiempo real y sin necesidad de desplegar esfuerzos en el terreno. Por otra parte, hemos estudiado los patrones de actividad y movilidad humana para caracterizar las interacciones entre regiones de un país en desarrollo. Encontramos que las redes de llamadas y trayectorias humanas tienen estructuras de comunidades asociadas a regiones y centros urbanos. En resumen, hemos mostrado que es posible entender procesos sociales complejos por medio del análisis de datos de actividad humana y la teoría de redes complejas. A lo largo de la tesis, hemos comprobado que fenómenos sociales como la influencia, polarización política o reacción a eventos críticos quedan reflejados en los patrones estructurales y dinámicos que presentan la redes construidas a partir de datos de conversaciones en redes sociales de Internet o telefonía móvil. ABSTRACT During daily routines, we are constantly interacting with electronic devices and telecommunication services. Unconsciously, we are massively leaving traces of our activity in the service providers’ databases. These new data sources have the dimensions required to enable the observation of human behavioral patterns at large scales. As a result, there has been an unprecedented explosion of data-driven social research. In this thesis, we develop computational and mathematical methods to analyze social systems by means of the combined study of human activity data and the theory of complex networks. Our goal is to characterize and understand the emergent systems from human interactions on the new technological spaces, such as the online social network Twitter and mobile phones. We analyze systems by means of the construction of complex networks and temporal series, studying their structure, functioning and temporal evolution. We also investigate on the nature of the observed patterns, by means of the mechanisms that rule the interactions among individuals, as well as on the impact of critical events on the system’s behavior. For this purpose, we have proposed models that explain the global structures and the emergent dynamics of information flow in the system. In the studies of the online social network Twitter, we have based our analysis on specific conversations, such as political protests, important announcements and electoral processes. From the messages related to the conversations, we identify the participant users and build networks of interactions with them. We specifically build one network to represent whoreceives- whose-messages and another to represent who-propagates-whose-messages. In general, we have found that these structures have complex properties, such as explosive growth and scale-free degree distributions. Based on the topological properties of these networks, we have identified three types of user behavior that determine the information flow dynamics due to their influence. In order to measure the users’ influence on the conversations, we have introduced a new measure called user efficiency. It is defined as the number of retransmissions obtained by message posted, and it measures the effects of the individual activity on the collective reacixtions. We have observed that the probability distribution of this property is ubiquitous across several Twitter conversation, regardlessly of their dimension or social context. Therefore, we suggest that there is a universal behavior in the relationship between individual efforts and collective reactions on Twitter. In order to explain the different factors that determine the user efficiency distribution, we have developed a computational model to simulate the diffusion of messages on Twitter, based on the mechanism of independent cascades. This model, allows us to measure the impact on the emergent efficiency distribution of the underlying network topology, as well as the way that users post messages. The results indicate that the emergence of an exclusive group of highly efficient users depends upon the heterogeneity of the underlying network instead of the individual behavior. Moreover, we have also developed techniques to infer the degree of polarization in social networks. We propose a methodology to estimate opinions in social networks and to measure the degree of polarization in the obtained opinions. We have designed a model to study the effects of the opinions of a small group of influential users, called elite, on the opinions of the majority of users. The model results in an opinions distribution to which we measure the degree of polarization. We apply our methodology to measure the polarization on graphs from the messages diffusion process, during a conversation on Twitter from a polarized society. The results are in very good agreement with offline and contextual data. With this study, we have shown that our methodology is capable of detecting several degrees of polarization depending on the structure of the networks. Finally, we have also inferred the human behavior from mobile phones’ data. On the one hand, we have characterized the impact of natural disasters, like flooding, on the collective behavior. We found that the communication patterns are abruptly altered in the areas affected by the catastrophe. Therefore, we demonstrate that we could measure the impact of the disaster on the region, almost in real-time and without needing to deploy further efforts. On the other hand, we have studied human activity and mobility patterns in order to characterize regional interactions on a developing country. We found that the calls and trajectories networks present community structure associated to regional and urban areas. In summary, we have shown that it is possible to understand complex social processes by means of analyzing human activity data and the theory of complex networks. Along the thesis, we have demonstrated that social phenomena, like influence, polarization and reaction to critical events, are reflected in the structural and dynamical patterns of the networks constructed from data regarding conversations on online social networks and mobile phones.

¿Es este un proyecto de Mies? / Is this a Mies s project?

Is this a Mies?s project? Disappearances, or the art of being a Mies project Angel Borrego Several years ago I had to solve the structure of Mies House of the Werkbund exhibition of 1931 as an exercise for a course named Structures Projects in the School of Architecture of Madrid. We were offered this house as an exercise because there had been some complaints about having to calculate and deal with ?bad, real, anonymous? architecture widely recognized as such, in so far as it has been widely published, that furthermore had some ideal quality to it, a quality reinforced by the fact that it was not there anymore, one could not go and see it, old and deteriorated, all images we have of it are of a shiny new object: in fact its ideal quality was even present in that it had not even been designed to be a completely real house, as nobody ever lived there and wasn?t supposed to. It was a three dimensional representation of a house, what gave it a further flair of ideality. And it was as well the representation of an idea, and we all liked that. Last but not least, it had Mies to back it up, which promised us the remote possibility of analyzing one of his works in depth, with proper tools (this was a structures course, and we had already read, or heard, something about the importance of structures in Mies?s work.) We were lured by the possibility of reconstructing, if not the pavilion, some of the ideas leading to it. Ideas that were themselves structural, like the ?perfectly regular all columnar structure?, an ideal structure. We had a sensation that we could somehow reproduce the process and thoughts of Mies leading to the solution of a particular work, investigate him in a cuasi archaeological manner, reconstruct the project, as if being able to reconstruct one work we could reconstruct the entire Mies, and placing ourselves in his position replace him, which was to know for once where we were (1). All these thoughts, passed through our minds more or less abstractly, believe it or not, before we realized that we were supposed to imagine that the roof was also supported by the walls and that the plan was lacking two columns, which was short. We could not believe that only to make the exercise more difficult, as it was admitted, the professors would mutilate a Mies work in such a way. The exercise had lost all interest to us and there were some timid protests. The surprise came when, though admitting that the supporting walls had been their idea, the professors said they had not manipulated the plan of the house at all. Some confusion followed, since that seemed quite incredible to us, even more to professors I guess. Two of us went to the library and checkout two books, one being the ?History of Modern Architecture? (the Benevolo as it was known), from where they said to have copied the plan of the house for the exercise, and another book on Mies that included the same project. The Benevolo was actually lacking the two columns, but the other book included them, making clear our point. We were able to reorient the exercise and calculate the house just as Mies had designed it. We, the students I mean, were really happy, since we had a voice in the discipline of architecture: our own discipline since we were the ones being disciplined, and we had been allowed to freely talk our way through it. I had the nice sensation that what happened was curiously and rewardingly similar to, or a kind of metaphor for, the flowing space of the free plan, that was allowed to move through the perfectly regular structure, a most disciplined structure. As Mark Wigley has noted, discipline is intimately related to prothesis. The concept of prothesis (pro-thesis) would be already architectural as ?the act of placing before?, referring to a structure that has to be placed before anything else; it is already a structure, rather than being something added that could be removed..