Homography-based ground plane detection using a single on-board camera

This study presents a robust method for ground plane detection in vision-based systems with a non-stationary camera. The proposed method is based on the reliable estimation of the homography between ground planes in successive images. This homography is computed using a feature matching approach, which in contrast to classical approaches to on-board motion estimation does not require explicit ego-motion calculation. As opposed to it, a novel homography calculation method based on a linear estimation framework is presented. This framework provides predictions of the ground plane transformation matrix that are dynamically updated with new measurements. The method is specially suited for challenging environments, in particular traffic scenarios, in which the information is scarce and the homography computed from the images is usually inaccurate or erroneous. The proposed estimation framework is able to remove erroneous measurements and to correct those that are inaccurate, hence producing a reliable homography estimate at each instant. It is based on the evaluation of the difference between the predicted and the observed transformations, measured according to the spectral norm of the associated matrix of differences. Moreover, an example is provided on how to use the information extracted from ground plane estimation to achieve object detection and tracking. The method has been successfully demonstrated for the detection of moving vehicles in traffic environments.

Array Compacto De Monopolos Planos Con Plano De Tierra Ranurado Para Sistemas Mimo

A compact array of monopoles with a slotted ground plane is analyzed for being used in MIMO systems. Compact arrays suffer usually from high coupling which degrades significantly MIMO benefits. Through a matching network, main drawbacks can be solved, although it tends to provide a low bandwidth. The studied design is an array of monopoles with a slot in the ground plane. The slot shape is optimized with a Genetic Algorithm and an own electromagnetic software based on MoM in order to fulfill main figures of merit within a significant bandwidth

Los paisajes del desecho: reactivación de los lugares del deterioro

Actualmente en nuestro planeta producimos 1.300 millones de toneladas de residuos urbanos al año. Si los extendemos sobre la superficie de un cuadrado de lado 100 m (una hectárea) alcanzarían una altura de 146 km. ¿Cuál es el origen de nuestros residuos? ¿A dónde va esta basura? ¿Cómo nos afecta? ¿Tiene alguna utilidad? Se trata de un problema antiguo que, en los últimos tiempos, ha adquirido una nueva dimensión por el tipo y la cantidad de residuos generados. Las primeras preocupaciones de la ciudad por ordenar estos problemas dieron lugar al establecimiento de espacios o lugares específicos para la acumulación de los residuos urbanos: los vertederos. Los desechos hoy se generan más rápidamente que los medios disponibles para reciclarlos o tratarlos. Los vertederos de residuos urbanos son y seguirán siendo, a corto y medio plazo, soluciones válidas por ser un método de gestión relativamente barato, sobre todo en los países en vías de desarrollo. Como consecuencia y necesidad de lo anterior, se plantea demostrar que la recuperación y la transformación de estos vertederos de residuos urbanos (lugares del deterioro), una vez abandonados, es posible y que además pueden dar lugar a nuevos espacios públicos estratégicos de la ciudad contemporánea. Son espacios de oportunidad, vacíos monumentales producto de una reactivación arquitectónica y paisajística realizada a partir de complejos procesos de ingeniería medioambiental. Pero las soluciones aplicadas a los vertederos de residuos urbanos desde mediados del siglo XX se han realizado exclusivamente desde la ingeniería para tratar de resolver cuestiones técnicas, un modelo agotado que ya no puede gestionar la magnitud que este problema ha alcanzado, haciéndose necesaria e inevitable la participación de la arquitectura para abrir nuevas líneas de investigación y de acción. En estos primeros compases del siglo XXI existe una “nueva” preocupación, un “nuevo” interés en los paradigmas de lo ecológico y de la sostenibilidad, también un interés filosófico (que igualmente otorga un nuevo valor al residuo como recurso), que dirigen su mirada hacia un concepto de paisaje abierto y diferente a modelos anteriores más estáticos, recuperando como punto de partida el ideal pintoresco. El landscape urbanism se consolida como una disciplina capaz de dar respuesta a lo natural y artificial simultáneamente, que sustituye a las herramientas tradicionales de la arquitectura para solucionar los problemas de la ciudad contemporánea, incorporando las infraestructuras de gran escala, como un vertedero de residuos urbanos, y los paisajes públicos que generan como el verdadero mecanismo de organización del urbanismo de hoy. No se trata solo de un modelo formal sino, lo que es más importante: de un modelo de procesos. Esta nueva preocupación permite abordar la cuestión del paisaje de manera amplia, sin restricciones, con un alto grado de flexibilidad en las nuevas propuestas que surgen como consecuencia de estos conceptos, si bien los esfuerzos, hasta la fecha, parecen haberse dirigido más hacia el fenómeno de lo estético, quedando todavía por explorar las consecuencias políticas, sociales, económicas y energéticas derivadas de los residuos. También las arquitectónicas. El proyecto del landscape urbanism se ocupa de la superficie horizontal, del plano del suelo. Desde siempre, la preparación de este plano para desarrollar cualquier actividad humana ha sido un gesto fundacional, un gesto propio necesario de toda arquitectura, que además ahora debe considerarlo como un medio o soporte biológicamente activo. En términos contemporáneos, el interés disciplinar radica en la continuidad y en la accesibilidad del suelo, diluyendo los límites; en que funcione a largo plazo, que se anticipe al cambio, a través de la flexibilidad y de la capacidad de negociación, y que sea público. La recuperación de un vertedero de residuos urbanos ofrece todas estas condiciones. Un breve recorrido por la historia revela los primeros ejemplos aislados de recuperación de estos lugares del deterioro, que han pasado por distintas fases en función de la cantidad y el tipo de los desechos producidos, evolucionando gracias a la tecnología y a una nueva mirada sobre el paisaje, hasta desarrollar una verdadera conciencia de lo ecológico (nacimiento de una ideología). El Monte Testaccio en Roma (siglos I-III d.C.) constituye un caso paradigmático y ejemplar de vertedero planificado a priori no solo como lugar en el que depositar los residuos, sino como lugar que será recuperado posteriormente y devuelto a la ciudad en forma de espacio público. Una topografía de desechos generada por acumulación, organizada y planificada durante tres siglos, que nos hace reflexionar sobre los temas de producción, consumo y proyecto arquitectónico. El Monte Testaccio revela una fuente de inspiración, un arquetipo de gestión sostenible de los recursos y del territorio. A través de la experiencia en la recuperación y transformación en espacios públicos de casos contemporáneos, como el antiguo vertedero de Valdemingómez en Madrid o el de El Garraf en Barcelona, se han analizado las técnicas y las soluciones empleadas para establecer nuevas herramientas de proyecto planteadas en clave de futuro, que revelan la importancia de los procesos frente a la forma, en los cuales intervienen muchos factores (tanto naturales como artificiales), entre ellos la vida y el tiempo de la materia viva acumulada. Son lugares para nuevas oportunidades y ejemplos de una nueva relación con la naturaleza. La reactivación de los vertederos de residuos, a través del proyecto, nos propone una nueva topografía construida en el tiempo, el suelo como soporte, como punto de encuentro de la naturaleza y los sistemas tecnológicos de la ciudad que posibilitan nuevos modos de vida y nuevas actividades. Los vertederos de residuos son inmensas topografías naturales surgidas de procesos artificiales, atalayas desde las que divisar un nuevo horizonte, un nuevo mundo, un nuevo futuro donde sea posible lograr la reversibilidad de nuestros actos del deterioro. Pero la voluntad de estas recuperaciones y transformaciones no consiste exclusivamente en su reintegración al paisaje, sino que han servido como muestra de las nuevas actitudes que la sociedad ha de emprender en relación a los temas medio ambientales. ABSTRACT Here on our planet we currently produce 1.3 billion tonnes of urban waste per year. If we were to spread this over a surface of 100m2 (one hectare), it would reach a height of 146km. What is the origin of this waste? Where does our refuse go? How does it affect us? Does it have any uses? We are dealing with an old problem which, in recent times, has taken on a new dimension due to the type of waste and the amount generated. Cities’ first concerns in resolving these problems gave rise to the establishment of areas or specific places for the accumulation of urban waste: landfills. These days, waste is generated more quickly than the available resources can recycle or process it. Urban waste landfills are and will continue to be, in the short and mid-term, valid solutions, given that they constitute a relatively cheap method for waste management, especially in developing countries. Consequently and necessarily, we plan to demonstrate that it is possible to recover and transform these urban waste landfills (areas of deterioration) once they have been abandoned and that they can give rise to new strategic public areas in contemporary cities. They are areas of opportunity, monumental vacancies produced by an architectural reactivation of the landscape, which is achieved using complex processes of environmental engineering. But the solutions applied to urban waste landfills throughout the 20th century have used engineering exclusively in the attempt to resolve the technical aspects. This is a worn-out model which can no longer handle the magnitude which the problem has attained and therefore, there is an inevitable need for the participation of architecture, which can open new lines of research and action. In these first steps into the 21st century, there is a “new” concern, a “new” interest in the paradigms of environmentalism and sustainability. There is also a philosophical interest (which assigns the new value of ‘resource’ to waste) and all is aimed towards the concept of an open landscape, unlike the previous, more static models, and the intention is to recover picturesque ideals as the starting point. Landscape urbanism has been established as a discipline capable of simultaneously responding to the natural and the artificial, replacing the traditional tools of architecture in order to resolve contemporary cities’ problems. It incorporates large scale infrastructures, such as urban waste landfills, and public landscapes which are generated as the true organisational mechanism of modern day urbanism. It is not merely a formal model, it is more important than that: it is a model of processes. This new concern allows us to address the matter of landscape in a broad way, without restrictions, and with a great degree of flexibility in the new proposals which come about as a consequence of these concepts. However, efforts to date seem to have been more directed at aesthetic aspects and we have yet to explore the political, social, economic and energetic consequences derived from waste – nor have we delved into the architectural consequences. The landscape urbanism project is involved with the horizontal surface, the ground plane. Traditionally, the preparation of this plane for the development of any human activity has been a foundational act, a necessary act of all architecture, but now this plane must be considered as a biologically active medium or support. In contemporary terms, the discipline’s interest lies in the continuity and accessibility of the land, diffusing the limits; in long term functionality; in the anticipation of change, via flexibility and the ability to negotiate; and in it being a public space. The recovery of an urban waste landfill offers all of these conditions. A brief look through history reveals the first isolated examples of recovery of these spaces of deterioration. They have gone through various phases based on the quantity and type of waste produced, they have evolved thanks to technology and a new outlook on the landscape, and a real environmental awareness has been developed (the birth of an ideology). Monte Testaccio in Rome (1st to 3rd Century AD) constitutes a paradigmatic and exemplary case of a landfill that was planned a priori not only as a place to deposit waste but also as a place that would be subsequently recovered and given back to the city in the form of a public space. This spoil mound, generated by organised and planned accumulation over three centuries, makes us reflect on the themes of production, consumption and architectural planning. Monte Testaccio reveals a source of inspiration, an archetype of the sustainable management of resources and land. Using our experience of contemporary cases of land recovery and its transformation into public spaces, such as the former Valdemingómez landfill in Madrid or the Garraf in Barcelona, we analysed the techniques and solutions used in order to establish new project tools. These are proposed with an eye on the future, seeing as they reveal the importance of the processes over the form and involve many factors (both natural and artificial), including the life and age of the accumulated living matter. They are places for new opportunities and examples of our new relationship with nature. The reactivation of landfills, via this project, is a proposal for a new topography built within time, using the ground as the support, as the meeting point between nature and the technological systems of the city which make it possible for new ways of life and new activities to come about. Landfills are immense natural topographical areas produced by artificial processes, watchtowers from which to discern a new horizon, a new world, a new future in which it will be possible to reverse our acts of deterioration. But the intention behind these recoveries and transformations does not only hope for landscape reintegration but it also hopes that they will also serve as a sign of the new attitudes that must be adopted by society with regard to environmental matters.

Corteza y gravedad: el plano del suelo como estrategia en la arquitectura contemporánea

Es, en el encuentro de los edificios con el terreno, donde el suelo como realidad se transforma en cualidad arquitectónica. La presente tesis aborda el estudio del plano del suelo, haciendo una revisión crítica de la arquitectura como mecanismo de pensamiento proyectual. Este análisis se enmarca a partir de los años sesenta, por considerar que es cuando comienza a evidenciarse la ruptura respecto a la herencia del Movimiento Moderno. Es entonces cuando la arquitectura marca un punto de inflexión, y empiezan a surgir diferentes actitudes metodológicas respecto al suelo, totalmente nuevas. Las clásicas acciones de encuentro como posar, elevar o enterrar fueron poco a poco sustituidas por otras más complejas como plegar, inclinar o esponjar. Utilizando como marco de restricción los encuentros o desencuentros del objeto arquitectónico con el terreno, se analiza el suelo como estrategia arquitectónica tratando de demostrar como su manipulación puede ser una eficaz herramienta con la que establecer relaciones específicas con el lugar. La capacidad que presenta el suelo, como elemento arquitectónico, de explorar y modificar las características de cada entorno, hacen de esta superficie una eficiente forma de contextualización. Por tanto, la manipulación del suelo que aquí se plantea, opera transcodificando los elementos específicos de cada lugar y actúa como estrategia arquitectónica que pone en relación al edificio con el contexto, modificando las particularidades formales de dicho plano. Frente a la tendencia que reduce la expresión arquitectónica a una simple apariencia formal autónoma, se plantea la manipulación del plano del suelo como mecanismo de enraizamiento con el lugar, enfatizando para ello la condición terrestre de la arquitectura. El plano del suelo es el que ata al edificio mediante la gravedad a la corteza terrestre. En realidad se trata de realzar el carácter mediador del suelo en la arquitectura, definiendo para ello el establecimiento de elementos comunes entre realidades distintas, potenciando el valor del suelo como herramienta que puede transcodificar el entorno, trasformando su datos en elementos arquitectónicos concretos. En este proceso de traducción de información, el suelo pasa de ser un objeto pasivo a ser uno operativo, convirtiéndose en parte activa de las acciones que sobre él se ejercen. La tesis tiene también como propósito demostrar cómo, la clave de la rápida evolución que el suelo como estrategia arquitectónica ha sufrido en los últimos años, mucho debe a la expansión del suelo en otras artes como en la escultura, y mas concretamente en el landart. Surgen entonces nuevas disciplinas, en las que se propone la comprensión del lugar en los proyectos desarrollando una visión integral del mundo natural, convirtiéndolo en un tejido viviente y conector que pone en relación las actividades que sustenta. También encontramos en Utzon, y sus plataformas geológicas, al precursor de la importancia que más tarde se le daría al plano del suelo en la arquitectura, ya que inicia cierta actitud crítica, que hizo avanzar hacia una arquitectura más expresiva que requería nuevos mecanismos que la relacionasen con el suelo que los soportaba, proponiendo con sus plataformas una transformación infraestructural del suelo. Con su interpretación transcultural de las estructuras espaciales arquetípicas mayas, chinas y japonesas, irá enriqueciendo el panorama arquitectónico, adquiriendo de este modo más valor el contexto que acabará por ser entendido de forma más compleja. Los proyectos de arquitectura en muchas ocasiones se han convertido en territorios propicios de especulación donde construir teoría arquitectónica. Desde este contexto se analizan cuatro estrategias de suelo a través del estudio de cuatro posiciones arquitectónicas muy significativas desde el punto de vista de la manipulación del plano del suelo, que construyen una interesante metodología proyectual con la que operar. Los casos de estudio, propuestos son; la Terminal Pasajeros (1996-2002) en Yokohama del estudio FOA, la Casa de la Música (1999-2005) de OMA en Oporto, el Memorial Judío (1998-2005) de Berlín de Peter Eisenman, y por último el Museo MAXXI (1998-2009) de Zaha Hadid en Roma. Descubrir las reglas, referencias y metodologías que cada uno nos propone, nos permite descubrir cuáles son los principales posicionamientos en relación al proyecto y su relación con el lugar. Las propuestas aquí expuestas abordan una nueva forma de entender el suelo, que hizo avanzar a la arquitectura hacia nuevos modos de encuentro con el terreno. Nos permite también establecer cuáles son las principales aportaciones arquitectónicas del suelo, como estrategia arquitectónica, que han derivado en su reformulación. Dichas contribuciones abren nuevas formas de abordar la arquitectura basadas en el movimiento y en la flexibilidad funcional, o en la superposición de flujos de información y circulación. También plantean nuevas vías desdibujando la figura contra el fondo, y refuerzan la idea del suelo como plataforma infraestructural que ya había sido enunciada por Utzon. Se trata en definitiva de proponer la exploración de la superficie del suelo como el elemento más revelador de las formas emergentes del espacio. ABSTRACT Where the building hits the ground, it is where the latter as reality becomes architectural quality. This thesis presents the study of the ground plane, making a critical review of architecture as a mechanism of projectual thought. This analysis starts from the sixties, because it is when the break begins to be demonstrated with regard to the inheritance of the Modern Movement. It is then when architecture marks a point of inflexion, and different, completely new methodological attitudes to the ground start to emerge. The classic meeting action like place, raise or bury are gradually replaced by more complex operations such as fold, bend or fluff up. Framing it within the meetings or disagreements between architectural object and ground, we analyzed it as architectural strategy trying to show how handling can be an effective tool to establish a specific relationship with the place. The capacity ground has, as an architectural element, to explore and modify the characteristics of each environment, makes this area an efficient tool for contextualization. Therefore, the manipulation of ground that is analyzed here, operates transcoding the specifics of each place and acts as architectural strategy that relates to the building with the context, modifying the structural peculiarities of such plane. Opposite to the reductive tendency of the architectural expression to a simple formal autonomous appearance, the manipulation of the ground plane is considered as a rooting mechanism place that emphasises the earthly condition of architecture. The ground plane is the one that binds the building by gravity to the earth’s crust. In fact, it tries to study the mediating character of the ground in architecture, defining for it to establish commonalities among different realities, enhancing the value of the ground as a tool that can transcode the environment, transforming its data into specific architectural elements. In this process of translating information, the ground goes from being a liability, to become active part of the actions exerted on the object. The thesis also tries to demonstrate how the key of the rapid evolution that the ground likes architectural strategy has gone through recently, much due to its use expansion in other arts such as sculpture. New disciplines arise then, in which one proposes the local understanding in the projects, developing an integral vision of the natural world and turning it into an element linking the activities it supports. We also find in Utzon, and his geological platforms, the precursor of the importance that later would be given to the ground plane in architecture, since it initiates a certain critical attitude, which advances towards a more expressive architecture, with new mechanisms that relate to the ground that it sits in, proposing with its platforms an infrastructural transformation of the ground. With his transcultural interpretation of the spatial archetypal structures, he will enrich the architectural discourse, making the context become understood in more complex ways. Architectural projects in many cases have become territories prone to architectural theory speculation. Within this context, four strategies are analyzed through the study of four very significant architectural positions, from the point of view of handling the ground plane, and the project methodology within which to operate. The case studies analyzed are; Passenger Terminal (1996-2002) in Yokohama from FOA, The House of the music (1999-2005) the OMA in Oporto, The Jew monument (1998-2005) in Berlin the Peter Eisenman, and finally the MAXXI Museum (1998-2009) the Zaha Hadid in Rome. Discovering the rules, references and methodologies that each of those offer, it allows to discover what the main positions are regarding the building and its relationship with the place where it is located. The proposals exposed here try to shed a different light on the ground, which architecture advancing in new ways on how meet it. The crossing of the different studied positions, allows us to establish what the main contributions of ground as architectural strategy are. Such contributions open up new approaches to architecture based on movement and functional flexibility, overlapping information flow and circulation, consider new ways that blur the figure against the background, and reinforce the idea of ground as infrastructural platform, already raised by Utzon. Summarizing, it tries to propose the exploration of the ground plane as the most revealing form of spatial exploration.

Analysis of the modified optical properties and band structure of GaAs12xSbx-capped InAs/GaAs quantum dots

The origin of the modified optical properties of InAs/GaAs quantum dots (QD) capped with a thin GaAs1−xSbx layer is analyzed in terms of the band structure. To do so, the size, shape, and composition of the QDs and capping layer are determined through cross-sectional scanning tunnelling microscopy and used as input parameters in an 8 × 8 k·p model. As the Sb content is increased, there are two competing effects determining carrier confinement and the oscillator strength: the increased QD height and reduced strain on one side and the reduced QD-capping layer valence band offset on the other. Nevertheless, the observed evolution of the photoluminescence (PL) intensity with Sb cannot be explained in terms of the oscillator strength between ground states, which decreases dramatically for Sb > 16%, where the band alignment becomes type II with the hole wavefunction localized outside the QD in the capping layer. Contrary to this behaviour, the PL intensity in the type II QDs is similar (at 15 K) or even larger (at room temperature) than in the type I Sb-free reference QDs. This indicates that the PL efficiency is dominated by carrier dynamics, which is altered by the presence of the GaAsSb capping layer. In particular, the presence of Sb leads to an enhanced PL thermal stability. From the comparison between the activation energies for thermal quenching of the PL and the modelled band structure, the main carrier escape mechanisms are suggested. In standard GaAs-capped QDs, escape of both electrons and holes to the GaAs barrier is the main PL quenching mechanism. For small-moderate Sb (<16%) for which the type I band alignment is kept, electrons escape to the GaAs barrier and holes escape to the GaAsSb capping layer, where redistribution and retraping processes can take place. For Sb contents above 16% (type-II region), holes remain in the GaAsSb layer and the escape of electrons from the QD to the GaAs barrier is most likely the dominant PL quenching mechanism. This means that electrons and holes behave dynamically as uncorrelated pairs in both the type-I and type-II structures.

Comparative assessment of global irradiation from a satellite estimate model (CM SAF) and on-ground measurements (SIAR): a Spanish case study

An analysis and comparison of daily and yearly solar irradiation from the satellite CM SAF database and a set of 301 stations from the Spanish SIAR network is performed using data of 2010 and 2011. This analysis is completed with the comparison of the estimations of effective irradiation incident on three different tilted planes (fixed, two axis tracking, north-south hori- zontal axis) using irradiation from these two data sources. Finally, a new map of yearly values of irradiation both on the horizontal plane and on inclined planes is produced mixing both sources with geostatistical techniques (kriging with external drift, KED) The Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) between CM SAF and SIAR is approximately 4% for the irradiation on the horizontal plane and is comprised between 5% and 6% for the irradiation incident on the inclined planes. The MAD between KED and SIAR, and KED and CM SAF is approximately 3% for the irradiation on the horizontal plane and is comprised between 3% and 4% for the irradiation incident on the inclined planes. The methods have been implemented using free software, available as supplementary ma- terial, and the data sources are freely available without restrictions.

Comparative assessment of global irradiation from a satellite estimate model (CM SAF) and on-ground measurements (SIAR): a Spanish case study

An analysis and comparison of daily and yearly solar irradiation from the satellite CM SAF database and a set of 301 stations from the Spanish SIAR network is performed using data of 2010 and 2011. This analysis is completed with the comparison of the estimations of effective irradiation incident on three different tilted planes (fixed, two axis tracking, north-south hori- zontal axis) using irradiation from these two data sources. Finally, a new map of yearly values of irradiation both on the horizontal plane and on inclined planes is produced mixing both sources with geostatistical techniques (kriging with external drift, KED) The Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) between CM SAF and SIAR is approximately 4% for the irradiation on the horizontal plane and is comprised between 5% and 6% for the irradiation incident on the inclined planes. The MAD between KED and SIAR, and KED and CM SAF is approximately 3% for the irradiation on the horizontal plane and is comprised between 3% and 4% for the irradiation incident on the inclined planes. The methods have been implemented using free software, available as supplementary ma- terial, and the data sources are freely available without restrictions.