Technical evaluation of a third generation optical pose tracker for motion analysis and image-guided surgery

Laparoscopic instrument tracking systems are an essential component in image-guided interventions and offer new possibilities to improve and automate objective assessment methods of surgical skills. In this study we present our system design to apply a third generation optical pose tracker (Micron- Tracker®) to laparoscopic practice. A technical evaluation of this design is performed in order to analyze its accuracy in computing the laparoscopic instrument tip position. Results show a stable fluctuation error over the entire analyzed workspace. The relative position errors are 1.776±1.675 mm, 1.817±1.762 mm, 1.854±1.740 mm, 2.455±2.164 mm, 2.545±2.496 mm, 2.764±2.342 mm, 2.512±2.493 mm for distances of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 mm, respectively. The accumulated distance error increases with the measured distance. The instrument inclination covered by the system is high, from 90 to 7.5 degrees. The system reports a low positional accuracy for the instrument tip.

Sensing colour stability and mixtures of powder paprika using optical reflectance and image analysis.

The production and industry of paprika present several problems related to quality and to production costs. One of the main difficulties is to obtain an objective and quick method for predicting quality. Quality in powder paprika involves: quantity of carotenoids and the appearance and stability of colour. The method used currently for determining quality is the measurement of absorbance at 460 nm wavelength, of an acetone extract of carotenoids, but there is no information about the appearance of the paprika or the stability of its colour with time. " Another important problem is the presence of mixtures of powdered paprika produced in the Spanish region of "La Vera", which has a peculiar way of production, with a high '' quality and price, with other products of lower quality. It is necessary to obtain methods which are able to detect the fraud.

Comparative study of two laparoscopic instrument tracker designs for motion analysis and image-guided surgery: a technical evaluation

Laparoscopic instrument tracking systems are a key element in image-guided interventions, which requires high accuracy to be used in a real surgical scenario. In addition, these systems are a suitable option for objective assessment of laparoscopic technical skills based on instrument motion analysis. This study presents a new approach that improves the accuracy of a previously presented system, which applies an optical pose tracking system to laparoscopic practice. A design enhancement of the artificial markers placed on the laparoscopic instrument as well as an improvement of the calibration process are presented as a means to achieve more accurate results. A technical evaluation has been performed in order to compare the accuracy between the previous design and the new approach. Results show a remarkable improvement in the fluctuation error throughout the measurement platform. Moreover, the accumulated distance error and the inclination error have been improved. The tilt range covered by the system is the same for both approaches, from 90º to 7.5º. The relative position error is better for the new approach mainly at close distances to the camera system

Gordon Matta-Clark a través de Rem Koolhaas : adición a través de eliminación

Gordon Matta-Clark es el origen de la presente investigación. Su obra, de total actualidad, ha ido ganando interés entre la comunidad de arquitectos, si bien su dimensión teórica se ha visto a menudo eclipsada por el poderoso atractivo de sus aberturas, cortes y extracciones. Son muchos los investigadores que detectan una carencia en el estudio de su corpus de pensamiento desde el campo de la crítica arquitectónica a la que está inevitablemente vinculado, a pesar de haber puesto en marcha una potente maquinaria de criticismo. Se constata a su vez la problemática existente al construir dialécticas entre la obra de Gordon Matta-Clark y el ámbito de la práctica arquitectónica. Surgen áreas forzadas de reflexión al elevar ambas esferas al mismo plano, achacado a un desconocimiento de las motivaciones críticas e históricas del proyecto del arquitecto. Aparece de modo recurrente un intento por establecer una dialéctica que, sin embargo, es relegada constantemente a una colección de notas al pie de página: Rem Koolhaas es sesgadamente mencionado por la crítica como el digno continuador accidental de las teorías de Gordon Matta-Clark. Se inicia así la construcción de una dialéctica que permanece aún sin resolver. Rem Koolhaas, en una entrevista en la que vierte su opinión sobre Gordon Matta-Clark, lo considera el precursor accidental de su ‘estrategia de vacío’, reconociendo en su trabajo procesos de adición a través de eliminación como método de creación de espacio arquitectónico. Una visión incisiva que desdeña su faceta de artista destructor destacando su habilidad para inocular el vacío mediante el empleo de herramientas de adición a través de eliminación. Estas premisas dan lugar de forma automática a la hipótesis de partida: la formalización de una investigación que llene ese vacío estableciendo un fuego cruzado entre ambos arquitectos, los cuales comparten de manera fortuita época y escenarios. El discurso de Rem Koolhaas iluminará el pensamiento de Gordon Matta-Clark vinculando sus respectivas plataformas de producción teórica, construyendo un espacio metafórico común en torno a la palabra y la imagen, herramientas que ambos manejan con habilidad y fluidez. Las propuestas del grupo Anarchitecture y las Art Cards o recortes anárquicos de soliloquios mattaclarkianos encuentran su réplica en el diccionario de términos e imágenes “Small, Medium, Large, Extra-Large”, descrito por Rem Koolhaas como una acumulación de palabras e imágenes que ilumina la condición de la arquitectura actual. La investigación establece una profusa asociación de ideas, imágenes y parlamentos que navegan en el universo referencial de Rem Koolhaas aportando una nueva visión sobre la dimensión crítica de Gordon Matta-Clark. Una visión poliédrica alrededor de cinco conceptos clave y un glosario de estrategias de proyecto que abren nuevos umbrales en los que la adición a través de la eliminación se repite hasta la saciedad transformado en mantra arquitectónico. ABSTRACT The present research finds its origins in Gordon Matta-Clark. His work, still relevant today, has been gaining interest within the community of architects, although its theoretical dimension has often been overshadowed by the powerful attraction of his openings, cuts and extractions. Many researchers detect a lack in the study of his body of thought from the field of architectural criticism to which he is inevitably associated, despite having launched a powerful machinery of criticism. It is noted at the same time the problem appeared when different dialectics between the work of Gordon Matta-Clark and the field of architectural practice are established. Forced areas of thought emerge when both fields are observed from the same point of view, derived from a lack of knowledge of the critical and historical motivations of the architect project. An attempt to establish a dialectical relationship with another architect appears recurrently in different books and writings. However it is steadily consigned to a collection of insignificant footnotes: the critics mention Rem Koolhaas as the worthy accidental successor of the theories of Gordon Matta-Clark. The construction of a dialectic that remains unresolved begins at this point. Gordon Matta-Clark is considered by Rem Koolhaas the accidental predecessor of his ‘strategy of emptiness’ -in an interview in which he pours his opinion on him- recognizing processes of addition through elimination in the work of Matta-Clark as a method of building architectural space. Rem Koolhaas rejects his role as destructor artist highlighting his ability to inoculate the emptiness by using addition tools through elimination. These premises lead us automatically to the hypothesis of the research: the formalization of research that will fill the emptiness by setting a crossfire between both architects, who share by chance the same scenarios and time. The discourse given by Rem Koolhaas illuminates Gordon Matta-Clark´s thought by linking their respective theoretical work platforms, building a common metaphorical space around word and image as tools managed by both of them with expertise and fluency. The Anarchitecture proposals and the Art Cards -anarchic cuts of Matta-Clark´s thought- find its counterpart in the dictionary of terms and images included in “Small, Medium, Large, Extra- Large”, described by Rem Koolhaas as an accumulation of words and images that illuminates the condition of architecture today. The research provides a wide range of associations of ideas, images and discussions around the universe of references of Rem Koolhaas, offering a new insight into the critical dimension of the work of Gordon Matta-Clark. A multifaceted vision around five key concepts and a glossary of project strategies that opens up new thresholds in which addition through elimination is repeated endlessly becoming an architectural mantra.

A Dynamically Adaptable Image Processing Application Trading Off Between High Performance, Consumption and Dependability in Real Time

As embedded systems evolve, problems inherent to technology become important limitations. In less than ten years, chips will exceed the maximum allowed power consumption affecting performance, since, even though the resources available per chip are increasing, frequency of operation has stalled. Besides, as the level of integration is increased, it is difficult to keep defect density under control, so new fault tolerant techniques are required. In this demo work, a new dynamically adaptable virtual architecture (ARTICo3) to allow dynamic and context-aware use of resources is implemented in a high performance Wireless Sensor node (HiReCookie) to perform an image processing application.

Subjective Evaluation of Transmission Errors in IPTV and 3DTV

The increase of multimedia services delivered over packet-based networks has entailed greater quality expectations of the end-users. This has led to an intensive research on techniques for evaluating the quality of experience perceived by the viewers of audiovisual content, considering the different degradations that it could suffer along the broadcasting system. In this paper, a comprehensive study of the impact of transmission errors affecting video and audio in IPTV is presented. With this aim, subjective assessment tests were carried out proposing a novel methodology trying to keep as close as possible home environment viewing conditions. Also 3DTV content in side-by-side format has been used in the experiments to compare the impact of the degradations. The results provide a better understanding of the effects of transmission errors, and show that the QoE related to the first approach of 3DTV is acceptable, but the visual discomfort that it causes should be reduced.

Level Set Segmentation with Shape and Appearance Models Using Affine Moment Descriptors

We propose a level set based variational approach that incorporates shape priors into edge-based and region-based models. The evolution of the active contour depends on local and global information. It has been implemented using an efficient narrow band technique. For each boundary pixel we calculate its dynamic according to its gray level, the neighborhood and geometric properties established by training shapes. We also propose a criterion for shape aligning based on affine transformation using an image normalization procedure. Finally, we illustrate the benefits of the our approach on the liver segmentation from CT images.

Single optical surface imaging designs with unconstrained object to image mapping

In this work, novel imaging designs with a single optical surface (either refractive or reflective) are presented. In some of these designs, both object and image shapes are given but mapping from object to image is obtained as a result of the design. In other designs, not only the mapping is obtained in the design process, but also the shape of the object is found. In the examples considered, the image is virtual and located at infinity and is seen from known pupil, which can emulate a human eye. In the first introductory part, 2D designs have been done using three different design methods: a SMS design, a compound Cartesian oval surface, and a differential equation method for the limit case of small pupil. At the point-size pupil limit, it is proven that these three methods coincide. In the second part, previous 2D designs are extended to 3D by rotation and the astigmatism of the image has been studied. As an advanced variation, the differential equation method is used to provide the freedom to control the tangential rays and sagittal rays simultaneously. As a result, designs without astigmatism (at the small pupil limit) on a curved object surface have been obtained. Finally, this anastigmatic differential equation method has been extended to 3D for the general case, in which freeform surfaces are designed.

Radio propagation modeling and measurements for ZigBee based indoor wireless sensor networks

The deployment of nodes in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) arises as one of the biggest challenges of this field, which involves in distributing a large number of embedded systems to fulfill a specific application. The connectivity of WSNs is difficult to estimate due to the irregularity of the physical environment and affects the WSN designers? decision on deploying sensor nodes. Therefore, in this paper, a new method is proposed to enhance the efficiency and accuracy on ZigBee propagation simulation in indoor environments. The method consists of two steps: automatic 3D indoor reconstruction and 3D ray-tracing based radio simulation. The automatic 3D indoor reconstruction employs unattended image classification algorithm and image vectorization algorithm to build the environment database accurately, which also significantly reduces time and efforts spent on non-radio propagation issue. The 3D ray tracing is developed by using kd-tree space division algorithm and a modified polar sweep algorithm, which accelerates the searching of rays over the entire space. Signal propagation model is proposed for the ray tracing engine by considering both the materials of obstacles and the impact of positions along the ray path of radio. Three different WSN deployments are realized in the indoor environment of an office and the results are verified to be accurate. Experimental results also indicate that the proposed method is efficient in pre-simulation strategy and 3D ray searching scheme and is suitable for different indoor environments.

Noise-agnostic adaptive image filtering without training references on an evolvable hardware platform

One of the main concerns of evolvable and adaptive systems is the need of a training mechanism, which is normally done by using a training reference and a test input. The fitness function to be optimized during the evolution (training) phase is obtained by comparing the output of the candidate systems against the reference. The adaptivity that this type of systems may provide by re-evolving during operation is especially important for applications with runtime variable conditions. However, fully automated self-adaptivity poses additional problems. For instance, in some cases, it is not possible to have such reference, because the changes in the environment conditions are unknown, so it becomes difficult to autonomously identify which problem requires to be solved, and hence, what conditions should be representative for an adequate re-evolution. In this paper, a solution to solve this dependency is presented and analyzed. The system consists of an image filter application mapped on an evolvable hardware platform, able to evolve using two consecutive frames from a camera as both test and reference images. The system is entirely mapped in an FPGA, and native dynamic and partial reconfiguration is used for evolution. It is also shown that using such images, both of them being noisy, as input and reference images in the evolution phase of the system is equivalent or even better than evolving the filter with offline images. The combination of both techniques results in the completely autonomous, noise type/level agnostic filtering system without reference image requirement described along the paper.

El imaginario en la génesis del proyecto arquitectónico: La construcción de la realidad a través del mito, la utopía y la cibercultura

El término imaginario, nombra el principio y el tema central de una investigación del mundo arquitectónico, necesaria para entender las condiciones alrededor de un proceso proyectual íntimo, cargado de significaciones ideológicas y simbólicas. En diferentes interpretaciones, el inconsciente colectivo y personal, científico o social, aparece en el origen de cada pensamiento y comportamiento humano, constituyendo un universo cerrado y caótico, donde todas las ideas están en constante tensión y contradicción. Por esta razón existen nociones y construcciones lógicas y coherentes que estructuran el marco de la verisimilitud y por tanto el régimen de la realidad, mediante la verdad y la verificación. Para el proyecto arquitectónico estas configuraciones se expresan en la situación del espacio, el tiempo y el cuerpo, como elementos básicos de jerarquización de la habitabilidad y de la cohabitabilidad humana. Esta tesis pretende acotar y definir un ámbito de procesos verosímiles instalados dentro del imaginario mediante el patrimonio intangible del pensamiento mítico o utópico, donde no solamente se crean envolventes del pensamiento, de iconografía o de sociedades, sino de donde también se derivan modelos rígidos y excluyentes, desde teorías basadas en la heteronormatividad y la segregación según el sexo, el género, la clase y la capacidad dentro de la diversidad funcional. La experiencia del espacio arquitectónico ha sido tradicionalmente descrita mediante palabras e imágenes: el lógos y el símbolo han sido los grandes intermediadores entre los sujetos y el habitar. Los ámbitos cotidiano y urbano se han regido por modelos y normas absolutas aplicadas universalmente y el mundo arquitectónico se ha visto estancado en la polaridad dual, entre lo público y lo privado, el dentro y el fuera, el movimiento y el reposo, el hombre y la mujer. Si el espacio-tiempo, el cuerpo y sus interpretaciones son la base para los modelos absolutistas, universalistas y perfeccionistas que han dominado el pensamiento occidental y elaborado la noción de lo “normal” en su totalidad, restando complejidad y diversidad, en la era hipermoderna ya no tiene sentido hablar en términos que no contemplen la superposición y la contradicción de la multiplicidad caótica en igualdad y en equilibrio instable. La realidad se ha visto reinventada a través de situaciones intermedias, los lugares inbetween en los espacios, tiempos, identidades y nociones presupuestas, donde se ha tergiversado el orden establecido, afectando al imaginario. La cotidianidad ha superado la arquitectura y el tiempo ha aniquilado el espacio. La conectividad, las redes y el libre acceso a la información – allá donde los haya – componen el marco que ha permitido a los sujetos subalternos emerger y empezar a consolidarse en el discurso teórico y práctico. Nuevos referentes están apareciendo en el hiper-espacio/tiempo aumentado, infringiendo todas aquellas leyes e interpretaciones impuestas para controlar los hábitos, las conductas y las personas. La casa, la ciudad y la metrópolis al vaciarse de contenidos, han dejado de cumplir funciones morales y simbólicas. Los no-lugares, los no-space, los no-time (Amann, 2011) son las condiciones radicalmente fenoménicas que reemplazan la realidad de lo vivido y activan de forma directa a los sentidos; son lugares que excitan el cuerpo como termótopos (Sloterdijk, 2002), que impulsan el crecimiento de la economía y en gran medida la multinormatividad. Sin duda alguna, aquí y ahora se requiere un nuevo modo de emplear la palabra, la imagen y la tecnología, dentro de una temporalidad efímera y eterna simultáneamente. ABSTRACT The term imaginary marks the beginning and the main topic of this research into the architectural world, presented as the necessary condition to understand the design process in its intimate layers, loaded with ideological and symbolic meanings. Through different interpretations, the unconscious, personal and collective, scientific or social, is found in the origin of every human thought and behaviour, constituting a closed chaotic universe, where all ideas are in constant tension and contradiction. This is why there are logical and coherent notions or discursive constructions which organise the context of verisimilitude and therefore the regime of reality through truth and its verification. For the architectural project, these specific configurations are associated with space, time and body as basic elements of management and hierarchization of human habitability and co-habitability. This thesis aims to demarcate and define a field of verisimilar processes installed in the imaginary, through the intangible heritage of mythical or utopian thinking, where not only enclosures of thought, iconography or utopian ideals are created, but from where rigid and exclusive models are derived as well, from theories based on heteronormativity and segregation by sex, gender, class and functional diversity. The experience of the architectural space has been described traditionally through words and images: the language and the symbol have been intermediating between the user and his habitat. Everyday life and urban interactions have been governed by absolute, universally applied, models or standards, therefore the architectural world has been stalled in a constant dual polarity between the public and the private, the inside and the outside, the movement and the repose, the man and the woman. Certainly, if the space-time notion, along with the theorization of the body, are the basis for absolutist, universalist and perfectionist models that have dominated western thought and developed the concept of “normal” in its totality, deducting all complexity and diversity, in the hypermodern era it makes no longer sense to speak in terms that ignore the overlap and contradiction of the chaotic multiplicity that characterises equality and unstable balance. Reality has been reinvented through intermediate situations, the in-between spaces, time, identities, or other presupposed notions. The order of truth has been distorted, affecting and transforming the contemporary imaginary. Everyday practices have surpassed the architectural design and time has annihilated space. Connectivity, networks, free access to information -wherever it exists-, compose the framework that has allowed subaltern subjectivity to emerge and begin to consolidate into main theoretical and practical discourses. New models are appearing in the augmented hyper-space/ time, transgressing any rule and interpretation imposed to control habits, behaviours and people. The house, the city and the metropolis are empty of content; they no longer fulfil moral and symbolic functions. The non-places, non-space, non-time (Amann, 2011) are radically phenomenal conditions that replace the reality of the lived experience and activate the senses as places that excite the body, thermotopos (Sloterdijk, 2002), which boost economic growth and to a considerable extent the multinormativity. Undoubtedly, what is required here and now is a new way of employing the word, the image and the technology within an ephemeral yet eternal temporality.

Sobre la Arquitectura en la definición del Paisaje

Comúnmente la Arquitectura se manifiesta en los edificios como un hecho de la realidad que tiene siempre carácter contemporáneo y ése debe ser el valor supremo de un arte que no distingue entre antiguo y moderno, por afectar al presente y ser contemporáneo como experiencia. Los objetos se insertan irremediablemente en su medio e incluso llegan a definirlo en ocasiones: así, arquitectura y paisaje, aparecerán a veces confundidos con diferencias difíciles de determinar. El término “paisaje” es relativamente moderno y se deriva de ciertas representaciones gráficas o pictóricas producidas en Occidente en época algo posterior al Renacimiento. No obstante, el hecho de que una palabra se pueda escribir o se cite no quiere decir que la realidad a la que responde no pueda existir, pues lo escrito es solamente un medio de expresión, y es obvio que existen otros quizá más antiguos y de idéntica importancia, pues la propia escritura no es más que el reflejo de un fenómeno que ya se ha producido con anterioridad. Parece así que el testimonio de la realidad viene dado por distintos contextos en lo que suele llamarse “cultura” de modo que las culturas pueden tener aspectos de gran interés mediante diferentes sistemas de expresión variados sin que eso tenga que pasar forzosamente por el filtro de un alfabeto y una escritura. A tenor de los primeros descubrimientos, parece que la cuestión de escribir tuvo originalmente un carácter de constatación de apunte contable y tampoco se puede establecer con certeza si algunos utilizaron la escritura como el so-porte adecuado para referir mitos o historias, pues la Arqueología no ha proporcionado sino testimonios fragmentarios; de lo que si está repleta sin duda la historia es de apuntes contables. Otra cuestión que suscita dudas es la propia definición de escritura, pues parece que los más antiguos modos de expresión escrita se reducen a pictogramas que resultan aún indescifrables. Lenguas y toponimia son también herramientas muy útiles para bucear en el pasado, pero aún así persisten dudas en las escrituras que pro-vienen de las representaciones primordiales: la propia escritura en sus orígenes parece alimentarse de las propias intuiciones inmediatas de la representación, algo que evolucionaría representando esa realidad urgente e inmediata del control o el abastecimiento que luego se convertirían en los fragmentos de texto que han podido conservarse. Es notorio, sin embargo, que ese conjunto enorme de convenios gráficos estaba sujeto a la palabra y la desaparición de las culturas determinó también la desaparición consecuente de sus lenguas, y esos signos - fueran o no escritura - han pasado definitivamente a las zonas oscuras del conocimiento. Escribir supone también disponer de capacidad de abstracción gráfica que diferencie la palabra y la cosa, y es posible que la razón que llevara a ese descubrimiento fuera simplemente el de una economía de signos, pues escritura y lenguaje son limitados por definición, mientras que las cosas del mundo son innumerables: ningún idioma contiene todas las palabras para describir todo lo que puede aparecer. Aparentemente, ese el motivo por el cual existe un localismo – un término específico que refiere algo que existe en un lugar y no en otros - en lo que se refiere a dar el nombre a la cosa y también fuente de paradigma entre los pueblos que se consideran primitivos y los que se consideran civilizados. Debe tenerse en cuenta también que esa transposición se da en ambos sentidos, de modo que las culturas más aisladas también incorporan conceptos que carecen de una explicación racional consistente. Las mitologías son así eternas, pues sirven para explicar realidades que carecen de un entendimiento alcanzable y está también bastante claro que los lenguajes resultan ser un enigma, como realidad autónoma que queda en-cerrada y se explica en sí misma. Parece también que los primeros en escribir las consonantes aisladas fueron los pueblos semíticos occidentales de las orillas del Mediterráneo, pueblos que crearon un alfabeto silábico que llegó a ser utilizado incluso por los tartesios en el sur de la península ibérica como el primer alfabeto de toda Europa occidental. Resulta patente que el término “paisaje” se ha nutrido siempre de representaciones, bien escritas o artísticas, pero queda también claro que esas representaciones se suponen derivadas de la creencia en una idea de paisaje como algo que se ve representado en sí mismo, es decir, como la imagen de una realidad externa situada fuera del individuo. Eso es un hecho trascendente, pues el paisaje requiere lejanía de la cosa, de modo que el actor – aún sabiéndose inserto en su paisaje – es incapaz de percibirlo desde dentro. En el paisaje ocurre igual que en un teatro o en una representación: los actores son conscientes de su papel y su posible cometido, pero no son los que realmente pueden disfrutar de la eficacia o de la propia presencia de la obra, pues forman parte de ella. La idea de paisaje proviene de una lectura externa a la de los propios protagonistas del drama, de modo que si quieren ser un crítico del paisaje se debe abandonar la representación para mirar el espectáculo desde una distancia adecuada, al fin y a cabo externa. De ese modo, aparece la primera constatación del hecho del paisaje como una realidad construida por objetos y personajes, pero, sobre todo, es una realidad construida por miradas. Llama también la atención otorgada en las lecturas de los especialistas hacia esa referencia externa - artística si se quiere - sobre el término “paisaje”, de modo que la bibliografía no especializada sobre el particular siempre acaba en tratados de pintura o poesía. Parece sin embargo que el hombre y sus paisajes son realidades indisolubles desde la propia aparición de la especie, de modo que llevar la cuestión hacia términos exclusivamente esteticistas parece una posición parcial. Hombre y medio han formado siempre una sola unidad, aunque esa unidad se haya convertido en determinados casos en sinónimo de depredación y destrozo. Sin embargo, esa destrucción crea igualmente un paisaje como desolación que es resultado del propio quehacer del hombre: elementos que también poseen un contenido sustancial de memoria en los paisajes industriales como un momento de la Historia previo a la automatización y a la globalización de la vida actuales. Quizá el concepto más interesante desde el punto de vista teórico sea precisamente el de esa cualidad del paisaje como mirada, algo externo producido por el contemplador en un momento ajeno a la pertenencia, una mirada que no es tan sólo estética sino comprensiva, gozosa, activa o analítica - pues existen tantas maneras de mirar como sujetos - sin que pueda definirse con precisión esa contemplación más que en términos que alcanzan la propia individualidad. En términos poéticos, también podría establecerse como ese conjunto de miradas individuales crean también una estructura que hace que ese paisaje se valore y se comprenda, de modo que desde ese punto de vista ese paisaje supone una creación colectiva. Con respeto o como depredador, el hombre se ha instalado en su medio, y al hacerlo, ha dejado huellas dentro del propio paisaje que hacen que tome una determinada significación. Naturalmente, existe una teoría que distingue entre “país” y “paisaje”, asumiendo para el primero la noción exclusiva de territorio en la cual el hombre no tiene papel estético alguno. He intentado muchas veces comprender esa posición, sin acabar de entender el planteamiento que la sustenta: parece que la visión de la cosa estará siempre humanizada, aún en las zonas “vírgenes” o intactas, pues la propia visión hace que el objeto se modifique en su propia unidad perceptiva, creando una curiosa indeterminación que lleva a los conocidos equívocos entre imagen real y representación. Efectivamente, la visión de la cosa requiere de una cultura y unos medios que la informan, de modo que un texto, una pintura, una descripción o una fotografía quedarán ya humanizadas por el propio hecho de ser informadas, pues ello otorga una forma a priori. De ese modo, el paisaje figura inscrito en una función que establece tanto aspectos de un paisaje posible como aspectos del paisaje descrito y solamente podrá hablarse sobre la potencialidad del estado final de ese paisaje y nada del propio paisaje en sí, mientras ese paisaje no quede humanizado por el propio observador. Esta cuestión obliga a elegir una definición de paisaje alejada de presupuestos esteticistas para acercarla a los puramente culturales, de modo que no existe otra vía para la investigación que contemplar esa realidad física en función de las coordenadas del hombre que la habita, dotada del contenido correspondiente a esa revelación. Lejos de las posiciones de la geomorfología, el término “paisaje” implicará así unas condiciones determinadas de contemplación por parte de un sujeto por el cual el espectáculo queda humanizado en dicho acto.Cabe pensar también si no es cierto que todos los paisajes requieren de esa condición humanizada, pues aunque no estén habitados están siempre ocupados por esa mirada que los habita, al igual que un escenario sin público que carece de vigencia. A partir de ahí se sitúan las coordenadas en donde este trabajo configura la presencia de la arquitectura en la definición del paisaje, una premisa que parece ya venir otorgada desde el principio, pues esa misma mirada del espectador ya está dotando de un sentido de orden y jerarquía a la contemplación, unas cualidades que están en la base de toda actividad arquitectónica, De hecho la propia definición de “monumento natural” - en si misma una contradicción – expresa ese conflicto, dotado de un fenómeno de admiración y solape entre cultura y naturaleza, como conceptos enfrentados desde su origen. La conclusión sobre el dilema propuesta en la tesis no ha sido otra que suponer que esas dos realidades que son la cultura y el paisaje se han solapado desde el principio de los tiempos del hombre formando un binomio indeslindable. Se ha dicho antes que el proceso de invasión del territorio por el hombre es significativo, y esa significación es la que origina una creación autónoma que se aísla como un concepto abstracto de los entes naturales, tomándolos como material de trabajo, y estableciendo una oposición conceptual en la realidad perforada e interpretada por el hombre que viene a oponerse a lo que supone la caja cerrada e ignota del enigma del mundo. La cuestión de la significación del hombre sobre el territorio se subsume en la creación de unos productos que permanecen y que son testimonio de la propia cultura, de forma que la cantidad de rastro que el hombre deja sobre el territorio contribuye en mayor medida a la cualificación del paisaje como concepto. Eso lleva a establecer que cualquier paisaje - por el mero hecho de serlo y ser definido así – es ya cultural, puesto que está configurado por los productos de la cultura. Las palabras que puedan quedar encerradas en las piedras de los monumentos o de las ciudades son las de los hombres que trabajaron allí, y también las de los que las habitaron: más aún, el propio sentido del paisaje y su conservación vienen determinados por la presencia del hombre como único interprete de conceptos como ecología o conservación, algo que se pone de manifiesto también en la espantosa devastación que producen los fenómenos propios de la naturaleza. La historia natural, al igual que la vida, están conformadas por éxito y devastación, sin que uno y otra tengan especial preferencia, pues la preferencia se alimenta de otra clase de conceptos. La cuestión de atribuir valores morales al mundo natural es algo muy antiguo, y quizá sea la fuente o el manantial de las primeras religiones, una cuestión que se une a la indefectible noción de mortalidad que define la existencia del hombre frente a la inmanencia de la naturaleza. Esa propia naturaleza está dotada intuitivamente de un carácter “inocente” suponiendo que la inocencia es lo opuesto a la sabiduría. La cuestión es bien otra, ya que la naturaleza no posee ni siquiera algo que pueda definirse como “carácter”, en el sentido personal del término. La cuestión no cae, evidentemente, del lado de las definiciones o de las cualidades, sino del propio análisis de la realidad que el hombre va construyendo, destruyendo, embelleciendo o perjudicando para definir el territorio que habita, interponiendo a su manera recursos, instalaciones y en definitiva todos los testimonios posibles como principal manifestación de su esencia. Entre los artefactos que el hombre produce, uno de los más persistentes y más conspicuamente descritos es el de la arquitectura - entendida aquí en un sentido amplio - es decir, como el conjunto de modificaciones del espacio y del territorio. El espacio se puede modificar de muchos modos, pero en cualquiera de los casos constituye una de las huellas más características que el hombre establece como manifestación física de su propio ser discursivo. También la arquitectura ha demostrado ser una de los fenómenos más persistentes, incluso más que la propia lengua que la origina en su discurso primero antes que pueda ac-cederse a una idea sobre la conformación del material. Es paradigmático que el episodio descrito sobre la Torre de Babel en la Biblia la cuestión de la ambición de los hombres frente a Dios, representada precisamente en una arquitectura, se asimile a la discusión sobre el lenguaje primordial. La cuestión no es baladí, pues el fenómeno de la creación es algo que se concede exclusivamente a los dioses, que por esa razón habitan los territorios a los que los hombres no pueden llegar; territorios de albergue en los que las mitologías sitúan a dioses y demonios, con amplios espacios intermedios donde situar a las divinidades menores, héroes o seres híbridos en los que la coyunda de los dioses con los humanos produce sujetos que alivian el sentido de la mortalidad. El comentario del Génesis también concede un valor a la técnica, al mito de Prometeo y al fuego como creador de excelencia. Frente al progreso prometeico, se postula el valor divino, y la única forma posible de paliar ese progreso es la confusión del lenguaje, pues eso será lo que produzca la dispersión y la falta de acuerdo. La cuestión también puede explicar esa afición tan común por lo canónico en arquitectura que se mantiene a lo largo de grandes períodos, al igual que una gran máquina de inercia. Parece que los conceptos primordiales de la arquitectura basados en elementos simples como el hito, el dintel, lo recto y lo curvo, la rampa o la escalera, y el uso distinto o cualificado que se otorga a la piedra, el ladrillo, la madera o el metal como componentes primordiales del material arquitectónico se haya mantenido a lo largo de muchos milenios sin apenas cambios, al igual que ocurre con las costumbres alimenticias que siguen una progresión ascendente a través de lo crudo, lo asado y lo cocido, hasta obtener distintos grados de refina-miento, pero que siempre se sustentan en la sensación primigenia. El descubrimiento de la arquitectura proviene de un cierto manejo de las dimensiones, y consiguientemente de la geometría. Pero la geometría es cosa abstracta al igual que el lenguaje, de modo que para poder realizar arquitectura se hace necesaria esa capacidad de abstracción primera que luego permite la realización de un dispositivo. La realidad y su número exhiben un divorcio, al igual que las cosas y sus nombres exhiben el suyo, y el análisis numérico es solamente una forma de ver la realidad, una forma rigurosa y exacta – aunque parcial - que solamente representa el modelo ideal al cual la realidad se aproxima en mayor o menor medida: esa aproximación matemática hace que el universo pueda condensarse parcialmente en números, al igual que la realidad puede condensarse en nombres, pero ni el nombre ni el número reflejarán el mundo en toda su complejidad. El número es quizá solamente un medio de describir las cosas, como lo serían las formas puras que responden a una configuración matemática que pueda producirse en teoría en cualquier parte del Universo. Sin embargo, para el ejercicio de la arquitectura es preciso acudir a esa simplificación que exige la visión abstracta del plano como una sección cierta realidad como un corte abstracto del elemento considerado. Con su traza o sin ella, con la propia expresión matemática que lo describa o sin precisarla, esa intuición del plano como elemento generador del espacio es anterior a aquella expresión, al igual que el habla fue anterior a la escritura, pues solamente se produjo a través de ella y como refuerzo y sustituto de la memoria. Existen así abstracciones de la memoria que aparecen derivadas de los signos de la naturaleza aparecidos solamente de forma eventual y fragmentaría: así ocurre con la línea, el cuadrado y el círculo, formas iniciales y abstractas sonsacadas en cierta medida de la observación que dan origen a los primeros signos de la arquitectura primordial, de modo que cuadrados y círculos, elevados a prismas y superficies esféricas o esferoides aparecen en tumbas y edificios elementales de los primeros tiempos mediante una geometría primordial que se superpone al paisaje en el que se inserta. Es cierto también que esas formas se encuentran ya aproximadas en objetos que se encuentran en el medio físico, líneas en extremidades, ramas y miembros; ángulos rectos en algunos cristales que se observan mediante corte o formas circulares en astros y cráteres, pero esa realidad solamente presenta su forma aproximada y no su abstracción pura, de igual modo que el jeroglífico propondrá al ave rapaz para representar la idea de vigilancia y la buena vista, o incluso que la imagen del propio ojo sustituya la idea del Dios que todo lo ve en las culturas anti-guas. La elección fue resuelta, después de muchos intentos y aproximaciones, con la adopción del ángulo recto como un artificio fácil para el replanteo a través del triángulo sagrado 3:4:5 que ya se utilizó para construir las pirámides de Egipto, y que dio origen también a la mayor parte del urbanismo antiguo, coexistiendo con la forma circular primordial en el tipo denominado “tholo”. Aquella trama cuadrangular era uno de los patrones de relleno del espacio más comunes y compactos, y esa fue probablemente la razón por la que en tiempos muy posteriores fuera adoptada como una forma eficaz permanente de organización frente al desorden topológico que procura el conjunto de asociación de plantas circulares. Otra cuestión paradigmática es que esos conceptos primordiales e ignotos - que convergen en el mismo origen de las civilizaciones - se conviertan luego en algo canónico, a través del uso. El canon en sí mismo es algo ideal, como una norma aplicable a objetos de una realidad que ha sido creada solamente como indicio del ca-non, algo abstracto que tiene proporciones estrictas que son siempre las mismas y no obedece a criterios racionales: será absurdo sin embargo buscar el canon griego entre los templos de época como algunos lo hicieron, pues los edificios solamente se aproximan a los ejemplos canónicos y por esa razón se habla del “dórico del Partenón” que es diferente del de Egina o del de Paestum, siendo todos ellos evidentemente dóricos. Sin embargo, esa idea resulta útil al tratadista, al teórico de la arquitectura y al historiador, aun-que solamente refleje una vaga idea de lo que sucede más allá del tratado. Otra cuestión es la sutileza de los ejemplos de arquitectura, y del mismo modo que los cuerpos de los seres vivos jamás son simétricos, aunque respondan a un diseño simétrico general derivado de las condiciones de la división celular, los edificios supuestamente canónicos en los que los especialistas se inspiraron para definir los órdenes clásicos no disponen de esa simetría modular exacta, sino que adaptan un modelo general al lugar siempre cambiante del emplazamiento, es decir, se adaptan con habilidad a la vez que configuran el paisaje en el que se insertan. La luz de los distintos intercolumnios del Partenón es ligeramente distinta, aunque guarde un evidente sentido de simetría axial, de manera que aquellos “órdenes” que formaron la Teoría de la Arquitectura no son más que una bella interpretación sectorial de la arquitectura antigua elaborada por los tratadistas del Renacimiento y, posteriormente, por los neoclásicos. Parece, sin embargo, que ese ansia por el canon como claridad de lenguaje es algo consustancial al desarrollo de la arquitectura, una lingua franca que tiende a evitar la dispersión producida entre los mortales por los dioses antiguos, de modo que si no era posible llegar al cielo de los dioses se procuró que el lenguaje de la Tierra fuera al menos inteligible para poder entenderse entre los hombres. Parece que la estructura del poder siempre requirió de un determinado nivel de organización, y también que las instrucciones se entendieran con claridad: parece que en nuestros tiempos esos antiguos cánones se han sustituido por la obediencia a normas abstractas, dictadas por instituciones también algo abstractas y que tienen nombres divertidos compuestos por siglas, aunque no se conozca bien su virtud. El canon actual está constituido por “normas” que dejan tranquilos a algunos, aunque parece quizá que todo ese entramado formal que sirve como anestesia para el cuerpo social procura también la destrucción de los bosques en formas de montañas ingentes de papel burocrático. Durante muchos siglos las normas fueron otras, en la forma de un canon del cual nadie podía escapar: aún así, mediante la utilización de cánones o sin ellos, la arquitectura prosperó en la civilización desde los primeros refugios cavernarios o los abrigos primigenios y de ese modo fue configurando la realidad, es decir, el paisaje. Como antes se dijo, ese es un viaje de ida y vuelta en el cual ambos se confundían y subsumían: el manejo de las formas y lenguajes de la arquitectura posibilitaría con el tiempo la distinción entre el campo en donde reina el caos y la ciudad, en donde reina teóricamente el orden, creando un divorcio que duraría milenios y que aún persiste. Esa oposición generaría también una forma de paisaje y una serie de usos simbólicos y sagrados de los elementos de la arquitectura - como son puertas y murallas - que se han mantenido conceptualmente aunque hoy las ciudades ya no posean murallas físicas, ni puertas que se cierran con la llegada de la noche. En ese sentido, la arquitectura ha podido definir el paisaje, entendiendo la arquitectura no solamente como los edificios en sí, sino como el hecho de la manifestación del hombre sobre el territorio, de modo que no podrá hablarse de paisaje sin su arquitectura, del mismo modo que no puede hablarse de paisaje sin hombres. Por esta razón, la Tesis habla sobre Arquitectura y Paisaje, pero más particularmente sobre el hecho de la arquitectura en la definición del paisaje, es decir, de como los hechos arquitectónicos van a determinar o no la cualidad y la calificación de un paisaje. Deberá partirse en primer lugar de una definición de lo que se entiende y se ha entendido comúnmente por paisaje: igualmente, y habida cuenta del contexto en el que sitúa el propio trabajo de tesis, la cuestión solamente se circunscribirá a lo que se entiende como cultura occidental, pues el desarrollo de la civilización presenta siempre un color local que hace que el análisis de un fenómeno de esta envergadura tenga distintas connotaciones en las distintas áreas de civilización. De igual modo, y habida cuenta también que el paisaje se construye a través de todas las manifestaciones culturales, se hará a veces necesario indagar en otras disciplinas no arquitectónicas para comprender el alcance de algunos casos en los cuales los restos arquitectónicos han desaparecido, o en los que subsisten escasas trazas. Una definición tan amplia de la Arquitectura llevaría a escribir un relato sobre toda la cultura occidental y por ese motivo solamente se han esbozado ideas sobre la aparición de esos signos sobre el paisaje basados en elementos antiguos y primigenios que se repiten con insistencia y van dando lugar al variado repertorio de la arquitectura occidental cómo conformación de ideas sobre el me-dio y sobre el mundo que se percibe y se habita. ABSTRACT About Architecture in defining Landscape. Abstract Architecture is commonly manifested in buildings as a fact of reality that has always a contemporary character and that should be the highest value of an art that does not distinguish between ancient and modern, to affect the present and be contemporary as experience. Objects are inserted irremediably in their midst and even sometimes come to define it: thus, architecture and landscape, appear sometimes confused with differences difficult to determine. However, the term "landscape" is relatively modern and is derived from certain graphical or pictorial representations produced in the West in some subsequent period to the Renaissance. The fact that a word can be written or quoting does not mean that the reality that can not be answered, because the writing is only a mean of expression, and it is obvious that there are other and perhaps older equally important, because the writing itself is nothing more than the reflection of a phenomenon that has occurred before. It thus appears that the testimony of reality is given by different contexts in what is called "culture", so that cultures can have aspects of great interest by many different expression systems without this necessarily have to pass through the filter of alphabet and writing. Under the initial findings, it appears that the question of writing originally had a character and finding accounting entries, and it can not be established with certainty whether some used writing as the support appropriate to refer myths or stories, because archaeology has provided only fragmentary evidence. Another issue that raises questions is what can properly be defined as writing, it seems that the oldest modes are reduced to writing pictograms are still indecipherable. Languages and place names are also very useful tools for diving in the past, but still questions remain in the scriptures that come from the primordial representations: either it is very well defined what the own writing in its origins: the beginnings seem to feed on immediate intuitions of representation, which would evolve representing reality that urgent and immediate control or supply which is then inherited into fragments. It is noteworthy, however, that this huge set of graphics agreements was subject to the word and the disappearance of cultures determined also the consequent disappearance of their languages, and those signs - whether or not they write - have passed definitively to dark areas of knowledge. Writings supposed also the capacity of abstraction graph differentiates the word and the thing, and it is possible that the reason to carry this discovery was simply that of an economy of signs, for writing and language are limited by definition, while the things of the world are innumerable: no language contains all words to describe all that may appear. Apparently, that's why there is a localism - a specific term that refers to something that exists in one place and not in others - in regards to name the thing and also the source of paradigm among peoples are considered primitive and civilized. It should be noted also that transposition occurs in both directions, so that the most isolated cultures also incorporate concepts that lack a consistent rational explanation. Mythologies are eternal and therefore serve to explain realities that lack an understanding achievable and also pretty clear that languages happen to be an enigma, as an autonomous reality that is enclosed and explains itself. It also seems that the first to write consonants were isolated western Semitic peoples from the shores of the Mediterranean, peoples who created a syllabic alphabet came to be used even by tartesios in southern Iberia as the first alphabet in Western Europe. It is clear that the term "landscape" has always nurtured representations, either written or artis-tic, but it is also clear that these representations are assumed arising from belief in an idea of landscape as something that is represented in itself, as the image of a reality external located outside the individual. That is an important fact because the landscape requires remoteness of the thing, so that the actor - even knowing insert in landscape - is unable to perceive from within. The landscape is just as in a theatre or a performance: the actors are aware of their role and their possible role, but they are not the ones who can really enjoy the efficiency or the presence of the work itself, as part of it. The idea comes from an external landscape reading the principles of players in the drama, so if you want to be a critic of the landscape should leave the actual representation to watch the spectacle from a safe distance, finally external. Thus, the first finding of fact of the landscape appears as a reality constructed by objects and characters, but above all, a reality constructed by looks. Also noteworthy given the readings of specialists to the external reference - art if it could be - on the term "landscape", so no specialized literature on the subject always ends in treatises on painting or poetry. It seems however that the man and his landscapes are inseparable realities from the very onset of the species, so bring the issue into terms exclusively aesthetics seems a partial position. Man and environment have always been a single unit, but that unit has become synonymous with certain cases predation and destruction. Nevertheless, this destruction also creates a landscape as desolation that results from proper task of man elements that also have substantial contents of memory in industrial landscapes as a time of pre-automation history and globalization of current life. Perhaps the most interesting from a theoretical point of view is precisely that quality of landscape as something external produced by the viewer in a strange time of membership, a look that is not only aesthetic but sympathetic, joyful, active concept or analytical - because there are so many ways to look as subjects - it may not be precisely defined that contemplation rather than in terms that reach one's individuality. In poetic terms, it could also be set as the set of individual gazes also create a structure that makes this landscape is valued and understood, so from that point of view that landscape is a collective creation. With respect or as a predator, man has settled in his environment and in doing so has left traces in the landscape itself that make take a certain significance. Naturally, there is a theory that distinguishes what is "home" and what is "nature" providing for the first notion of the exclusive territory in which man has no aesthetic role. I tried many times to understand this position, without understanding the approach that supports: it seems that the vision of the thing is always humane, even in the "virgin" or untouched areas, as the vision itself makes the object modified in its own perceptual unit, creating a curious indeterminacy leading to the known misunderstandings between real image and representation. Indeed, the vision of the thing requires a culture and means that the report, so that a text, a picture, a description or photograph will be humanized by the very fact of being informed, as this provides a way a priori. Thus, the landscape provides a function that sets both aspects of a potential landscape as described aspects of the landscape and can only talk about the potential of the final state of the landscape, while the landscape remains humanized by the observer himself. This question forces to choose a definition of remote landscape budgets purely cultural, so there is another way for research to contemplate that physical reality in terms of the coordinates of the man who inhabits gifted content corresponding to that revelation. Far from the positions of the geomorphology, the term "landscape" and involve a certain condition by contemplation of a subject for which the show is humanized in the act. It should also consider, in the light of the above, if it is not true that all landscapes require that humanized condition, because although they are not inhabited they are always occupied by the look that dwells, like a stage without audience produces no consistent effect. From there the coordinates where this work sets the presence of architecture in defining landscape, a premise which seems to come from the beginning given lie, because that same look is already giving the viewer a sense of order and hierarchy to contemplation, qualities that are at the basis of all architectural activity, in fact the very definition of "natural monument" - in itself a contradiction - expresses this conflict, which has a phenomenon of admiration and overlap between culture and nature as concepts faced since its inception. The conclusion on the dilemma proposed in the thesis has not been another to assume that these two realities are the culture and landscape have overlapped since the beginning of man time forming a pair. It has been said before that the process of invasion of the territory by man is significant, and that meaning is the originating autonomous creation that is isolated as an abstract concept of nature, taking them as working material, and establishing a conceptual opposition in reality and punched by the man who comes to oppose representing the closed and unknown to the enigma of the world interpreted. The question of the significance of the man on the land is subsumed in the creation of products that remain and are testimony of their own culture, so that the trace amount that the man leaves the territory contributes most to the qualification landscape as a concept. That brought into any landscape - by the mere fact of being and being well defined - is already cultural, as it is configured by culture products. The words that can be locked in the stones of the monuments or cities are those of the men who worked there, and also of those who inhabited: even more, the sense of the landscape itself and its conservation are determined by the presence of man as the sole interpreter of concepts such as ecology or conservation, something which becomes manifest also in the awful devastation that produce the phenomena of nature. The natural history, like life, are shaped by success and devastation without special preference, the preference is used for feeding on other kinds of concepts. The question of moral values attributed to the natural world is very ancient, and may be the source or the source of the first religions, an issue that joins the unfailing notion of mortality that defines the existence of man against immanence of nature. That nature is endowed intuitively an "innocent" character assuming that innocence is the opposite of wisdom. The other issue is well, since nature does not even have what is defined as "character" because that is something that serves to qualify beings, but not objects. The question does not fall clearly on the side of the definitions or qualities, but from the analysis of the reality that man is building, destroying or damaging to define the territory, interposing his way resources facilities and possible witness as the main manifestation of its essence. Among the artifacts that man produces one of the most persistent and most conspicuously disclosed is architecture as a way of modification of space and territory. The space can be modified in many ways, but in either case is one of the most characteristic traces that man establishes as a physical manifestation of his own discourse being. Architecture has also proven to be one of the most persistent phenomena, even more than their own language that originates in his speech first. The paradigm wrote in the episode described on the Tower of Babel in the Bible shows the question of ambition of men before God - represented precisely in architecture - is assimilated to the discussion about the primary language. The issue is not trivial, since the phenomenon of creation is something that is granted exclusively to the gods, for that reason inhabit the territories to which men can not reach; territories where the hostel located mythologies gods and demons, with large gaps where to place the minor deities, heroes or hybrid beings where the yoke of the gods with human subjects produces relieving sense of mortality. The commentary on Genesis also gives a value to the art, the myth of Prometheus and fire as creator of excellence. In front of promethean progress, divine value is postulated, and the only possible way to alleviate this progress is the confusion of language, because that is what will produce the dispersion and lack of agreement. The issue may also explain such a common passion for the canonical architecture maintained throughout long periods, like a great machine inertia. It seems that the main concepts of architecture based on simple elements like milestone, lintels, straight and curved stairs or ramps, or other qualified and used are granted to the stone, brick, wood or metal as the primary components of the architectural material maintained throughout many millennia are almost unchanged, as is the case with the eating habits that follow a progression through the raw, the cooked and roasted or fried until obtain different degrees of refinement, but always are based on the primal feeling. The discovery of the architecture comes from a management dimensions, and consequently the geometry. But the geometry is abstract thing like the language so that to make architecture that first absorption capacity which then allows the realization of a device is necessary. Reality and its number exhibit a divorce, like things and their names displayed his; numerical analysis is just one way of seeing reality, rigorous and accurate - though partial - only represents the ideal model to which reality is coming to a greater or lesser extent: the mathematical approach makes the universe can condense on numbers, like reality may condense on names, but neither the name nor the number will reflect in all its complexity. The number is only a means of describing things, such as the pure forms that match setup a mathematical theory that occurs anywhere in the universe. However, for the practice of architecture is necessary to go to the simplification that requires abstract view of a section plane of reality, as an abstract element considered cutting. With its trace or not, with the mathematical expression that describes what or without clarify, this intuition of the plane as a generator of space predates his own expression, like speech preceded the writing, which only occurred through it and as reinforcement and replacement of memory. There are abstractions of memory displayed on the signs of nature only on casual and fragmentary, such as line, square and circle: those initials and abstract forms located in abstraction give rise to the first signs of primordial architecture, so that squares and circles, lifting two prisms and spheroids or spherical surfaces appear in tombs and elementary buildings the first few times, and that primordial geometry overlaps the landscape in which it is inserted. It is also true that these forms are approximate objects found in the physical environment, limb lines, branches and limbs; straight in some crystals angles observed by cutting or circular in stars and craters forms, but only the approximate shape and not its abstraction, just as the hieroglyphic of a falcon to represent the idea of surveillance presents the good view, or even the image of the eye itself replace the idea of the all-seeing God. The election was resolved, after many attempts and approaches, with the adoption of the right angle as an easy trick for stake through the sacred triangle 3:4:5 already used to build the pyramids of Egypt, and also gave rise to most of the old urbanism tend coexist with the primary circular form type called "Tholo". That frame homer was one of the fill patterns of common and compact space, and that was probably the reason why in much later times was adopted as a permanent effective form of organization against the topological disorder that seeks the set of association circular plants. Another issue is that these paradigmatic and unknown primary concepts - that converge at the origin of civilizations - then become something canon, through use. The canon itself is something ideal, as a rule for objects of a reality that has been created only as an indication of the ca-non, something abstract that has strict proportions are always the same and not due to rational criteria: be absurd however seek the Greek canon among the temples of time as some did, because the buildings only approximate the canonical examples and for that reason we speak of "doric from Parthenon" which is different from Aegina or Paestum, being all clearly doric. However, this idea is useful to scholar, the architectural theorist and historian, although it reflects only a vague idea of what happens beyond the book. Another issue is the subtlety of the examples of architecture, just as the bodies of living beings are never symmetrical, even if they involve a general symmetrical design derived from the conditions of cell division, the supposedly canonical buildings where specialists were inspired to define the classical orders do not have that exact modular symmetry, but a general model adapted to the ever changing location of the site shaping the landscape in which they are inserted. The light of the various bays of the Parthenon is slightly different, but keep a clear sense of axial symmetry, so that those "orders" that formed the theory of architecture are just a beautiful sectoral interpretation of ancient architecture developed by writers of the Renaissance and later by neoclassical. It seems, however, that craving for clarity of language canon as is inherent to the development of architecture, a lingua franca that tends to avoid scattering among mortals by the ancient gods, so if it was not possible the heaven of the gods sought the language of the Earth was at least intelligible to be understood. Power structure has always required a certain level of organization, and the instructions are clearly understood: it seems that in our times these ancient canons were replaced by obedience to abstract rules, issued by institutions also somewhat abstract and have funny names made up acronym, although not well known virtue. The current canon consists of "rules" that leave some quiet, although it seems that maybe all that interweaves-do formally serving as anaesthesia for the social body also seeks the destruction of forests in forms of huge mountains of bureaucratic paper. For many centuries were other rules, in the form of a canon which no one could escape: still using royalties or without them, civilization flourished in architecture from the earliest cave shelters or shelters and the primordial reality was setting mode in landscape. As noted above, this is a return trip in which both confused and subsumed: the management of forms and languages of architecture over time would allow the distinction between the field where chaos reigns and city, where order reigns theoretically creating a divorce that lasted millennia and still persists. This opposition also generate a form of landscape and a series of symbolic and sacred uses of architectural elements - such as doors and walls - which have remained conceptually although today the cities no longer having physical walls or doors close during the night. In this sense, the architecture could define the landscape, architecture is not only understood as the buildings themselves, but the fact of the manifestation of the man on the premises, so you can not speak without his landscape architecture, the same so we can not speak of landscape without men. For this reason, the thesis discusses architecture and landscape, but more particularly to the fact of architecture in defining landscape, as the facts of architectural or not will determine the quality and qualification of a landscape. One should begin first a definition of what is understood and has been commonly understood by landscape: equally, and given the context in which it places the own thesis work, the issue only be limited to what is understood as western culture, for the development of civilization always has a local colour that makes the analysis of a phenomenon of this magnitude have different connotations in different areas of civilization. Similarly, and given also that the landscape is constructed through all cultural manifestations, will sometimes necessary to investigate other non-architectural disciplines to understand the scope of some cases in which the architectural remains have disappeared, or the remaining few traces. Such a broad definition of architecture take to write a story about all of Western culture and for this reason only been sketched ideas about the appearance of these signs on the landscape based on ancient and primitive elements are repeated insistently and leading the varied repertoire of Western architecture shaping ideas about how the media and the world is perceived and inhabited.

Computer simulation of the interplay between fractal structures and surrounding heterogeneous multifractal distributions. Applications

In a large number of physical, biological and environmental processes interfaces with high irregular geometry appear separating media (phases) in which the heterogeneity of constituents is present. In this work the quantification of the interplay between irregular structures and surrounding heterogeneous distributions in the plane is made For a geometric set image and a mass distribution (measure) image supported in image, being image, the mass image gives account of the interplay between the geometric structure and the surrounding distribution. A computation method is developed for the estimation and corresponding scaling analysis of image, being image a fractal plane set of Minkowski dimension image and image a multifractal measure produced by random multiplicative cascades. The method is applied to natural and mathematical fractal structures in order to study the influence of both, the irregularity of the geometric structure and the heterogeneity of the distribution, in the scaling of image. Applications to the analysis and modeling of interplay of phases in environmental scenarios are given.

Computer simulation of random parckings for self-similar particle size distributions in soil and granular materials: porosity and pore size distribution

A 2D computer simulation method of random packings is applied to sets of particles generated by a self-similar uniparametric model for particle size distributions (PSDs) in granular media. The parameter p which controls the model is the proportion of mass of particles corresponding to the left half of the normalized size interval [0,1]. First the influence on the total porosity of the parameter p is analyzed and interpreted. It is shown that such parameter, and the fractal exponent of the associated power scaling, are efficient packing parameters, but this last one is not in the way predicted in a former published work addressing an analogous research in artificial granular materials. The total porosity reaches the minimum value for p = 0.6. Limited information on the pore size distribution is obtained from the packing simulations and by means of morphological analysis methods. Results show that the range of pore sizes increases for decreasing values of p showing also different shape in the volume pore size distribution. Further research including simulations with a greater number of particles and image resolution are required to obtain finer results on the hierarchical structure of pore space.

Logarithmical hopping encoding: a low computational complexity algorithm for image compression

LHE (logarithmical hopping encoding) is a computationally efficient image compression algorithm that exploits the Weber–Fechner law to encode the error between colour component predictions and the actual value of such components. More concretely, for each pixel, luminance and chrominance predictions are calculated as a function of the surrounding pixels and then the error between the predictions and the actual values are logarithmically quantised. The main advantage of LHE is that although it is capable of achieving a low-bit rate encoding with high quality results in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and image quality metrics with full-reference (FSIM) and non-reference (blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator), its time complexity is O( n) and its memory complexity is O(1). Furthermore, an enhanced version of the algorithm is proposed, where the output codes provided by the logarithmical quantiser are used in a pre-processing stage to estimate the perceptual relevance of the image blocks. This allows the algorithm to downsample the blocks with low perceptual relevance, thus improving the compression rate. The performance of LHE is especially remarkable when the bit per pixel rate is low, showing much better quality, in terms of PSNR and FSIM, than JPEG and slightly lower quality than JPEG-2000 but being more computationally efficient.