An analysis of recent changes in Spanish Coastal Law

Spanish coastal legislation has changed in response to changing circumstances. The objective of the 1969 Spanish Coastal Law was to assign responsibilities in the Public Domain to the authorities. The 1980 Spanish Coastal Law addressed infractions and sanctions issues. The 1988 Spanish Coastal Law completed the responsibilities and sanctions aspects and included others related to the delimitation of the Public Domain, the private properties close to the Public Domain, and limitations on landuse in this area. The 1988 Spanish Coastal Law has been controversial since its publication. The “European Parliament Report on the impact of extensive urbanization in Spain on individual rights of European citizen, on the environment and on the application of EU law, based upon petitions received”, published in 2009 recommended that the Spanish Authorities make an urgent revision of the Coastal Law with the main objective of protecting property owners whose buildings do not have negative effects on the coastal environment. The revision recommended has been carried out, in the new Spanish Coastal Law “Ley 2/2013, de 29 de mayo, de protección y uso sostenible del litoral y de modificación de la Ley 22/1988, de 28 de Julio, de Costas”, published in May of 2013. This is the first major change in the 25 years since the previous 1988 Spanish Coastal Law. This paper compares the 1988 and 2013 Spanish Coastal Law documents, highlighting the most important issues like the Public Domain description, limitations in private properties close to the Public Domain limit, climate change influence, authorizations length, etc. The paper includes proposals for further improvements.

Compensación de energía reactiva en los servicios auxiliares de una central térmica

El proyecto tiene como objeto analizar desde el punto de vista técnico-económico las posibilidades para mejorar el factor de potencia en los consumos auxiliares de la Central térmica Litoral, perteneciente a Endesa Generación. Debido a un cambio normativo, las tarifas de acceso a las redes de transporte y distribución de energía eléctrica aplicarán ahora también a los consumos propios de las empresas productoras de electricidad dentro del ámbito de aplicación de las tarifas de acceso. Como la energía reactiva se facturará en función del factor de potencia se propone para su compensación la instalación de bancos de condensadores para mejorar el mismo y disminuir la penalización. Para el dimensionamiento de los bancos se han utilizado los consumos horarios de los años 2012 y 2013 de tres fronteras: grupos 1 y 2 de 400 kV y los transformadores auxiliares de arranque (OTAAs) de 6 kV , teniendo en cuenta las peculiaridades de una Central de Generación, ya que sólo serán objeto de estudio (a efecto de penalizaciones) las horas en las que el grupo está parado o arrancando. El resultado final muestra la diferencia en cuanto a los periodos de amortización de una instalación con generación y sin generación, siendo esta última más rentable económicamente. ABSTRACT The goal of this project is to analyse the possibilities to better the power factor in the auxiliary consumption of the Thermal Plant Litoral from an economic and technical viewpoint. Due to a normative changes, the access price rates for the transportation and distribution of electrical energy, will also apply now to the electricity productive companies own consumption within the scope of the access rate. Since reactive power is invoiced based on the potency factor, we propose the installation of capacitor banks to improve the aforementioned power factor as compensation so as to reduce sanctions. We have used the time profiles from 2012 and 2013 to dimension the banks, using 3 borders: Group 1 and 2 (400 kV) and the auxiliary starter transformers (OTAA's) of 6kV, taking into account the special characteristics of a Generation Plant , since we will only study the hours that the group was shut down or powering up (since these are what the penalties cover). The final result shows the difference in regards to repayment periods for both generating and nongenerating installation, being the aforesaid the most economically worthwile of the two