Aplicación de distintas metodologías a la monitorización de la humedad del suelo y al cálculo del balance hídrico diario

Dada la importancia de conocer la humedad del suelo de forma precisa y en tiempo real, se ha realizado este trabajo de investigación cuyo objetivo principal ha sido seleccionar un Balance Hídrico del Suelo (BHS) diario y validar sus estimaciones de humedad del suelo frente a medidas obtenidas “in situ”, aplicándolo a tres emplazamientos seleccionados en la zona centro con características edáficas y climáticas diferentes, y de este modo estimar con cierta precisión la humedad del suelo como Agua Disponible (AD) para las plantas y a su vez permitir la realización de estudios climáticos. Los observatorios meteorológicos seleccionados fueron: Guadalajara/El Serranillo en la zona aluvial del río Henares; Colmenar Viejo/Base Famet en la rampa sur del Guadarrama sobre rocas metamórficas; y Radiosondeo/Madrid(Barajas) en arenas arcósicas de grano grueso. Se realizó una caracterización morfológica y un estudio de las propiedades físicas, químicas e hidrofísicas de los suelos en cada emplazamiento. El suelo de Guadalajara, Xerorthent Típico presenta una secuencia genética de horizontes (Ap-AC-C1-C2) siendo su clase textural entre franco-arenosa a franca, con menos del 2% de elementos gruesos, presencia de caliza a lo largo de todo el perfil, destacando la homogeneidad en vertical y horizontal de sus propiedades. El suelo de Colmenar, Xerorthent Dystrico, presenta una secuencia genética de horizontes (A-C-C/R) apareciendo el horizonte C/R entre 20-30 cm; y la roca aproximadamente a unos 30 cm; destacando en este perfil su acidez y el alto contenido de elementos gruesos. El suelo de Radiosondeo, Haploxeralf Típico, presenta la secuencia normal de horizontes de los alfisoles (A-Bt1-Bt2-C/Bt); destacando su heterogeneidad principalmente en el plano horizontal, con presencia del Bt a diferentes profundidades en un corto espacio longitudinal. En una primera fase de experimentación (2007-2008) se seleccionaron BHS diarios que sólo utilizaban como datos de entrada la información de variables meteorológicas y el valor del Agua Disponible Total (ADT) para cada tipo de suelo y profundidad. Se probaron BHS diarios con agotamiento exponencial y directo de la reserva, utilizando la evapotranspiración de referencia de Penman-Monteith recomendada por FAO. Al mismo tiempo que se disponía de los datos estimados de humedad de suelo mediante diferentes BHS diarios en los tres emplazamientos, también se realizó una monitorización de la humedad del suelo “in situ” mediante el método gravimétrico, con adaptación de dicha metodología a la problemática de cada suelo, para determinar en cada fecha tanto la humedad del suelo como su contenido de AD para una profundidad de 0 a 30 cm. Se tomaron en cada fecha de muestreo 5 muestras para la profundidad 0- 10 cm, otras cinco para 10-20 cm y otras cinco para 20-30 cm, realizándose el correspondiente tratamiento estadístico de los datos. El ADT se calculó a partir de los datos de capacidad de campo y punto de marchitez obtenidos en laboratorio con membrana de Richards. Los resultados de esta primera fase permitieron conocer que el BHS exponencial diario era el que mejor estimaba el AD en Guadalajara considerando la capacidad de campo a una presión de 33 kPa, mientras que en Colmenar se debían considerar para un mejor ajuste, 10 kPa en lugar de 33 kPa. En el observatorio de Radiosondeo debido a que en cada fecha de muestreo la profundidad en la que aparecía el horizonte Bt era diferente, no se pudo demostrar si el BHS exponencial diario tenía un buen comportamiento. En una segunda fase de experimentación (2009-2012) y con el objeto de aminorar los problemas encontrados en Radiosondeo para la medida de humedad del suelo por el método gravimétrico, se procedió a la instalación y utilización de diferentes sensores de medida de humedad de suelo en el mismo observatorio: TDR (time domain reflectometry - TRIME T3 de IMKO); FDR capacitivo (frecuency domain reflectometry - ECH2O EC-20 de DECAGON) y otros. Esta segunda fase de experimentación tuvo una duración de 4 años y se compararon las medidas de humedad de suelo obtenidas a partir de los sensores con las estimadas del BHS exponencial hasta una profundidad de 0 a 85 cm. En laboratorio se realizaron calibraciones específicas de los sensores TDR y FDR para cada uno de los horizontes más diferenciados del Haploxeralf Típico, utilizando diferentes tipos de regresión. Los valores de humedad de suelo con el equipo TDR, corregidos mediante la calibración específica de laboratorio, fueron los que más se ajustaron a las medidas realizadas por método gravimétrico “in situ”, por lo que se utilizó el TDR para las comparaciones con los valores obtenidos del BHS exponencial diario durante los cuatro años de esta segunda fase experimental. Se realizaron diferentes estimaciones del ADT, partiendo de datos de laboratorio y/o de datos procedentes de humedad de los sensores en campo. Los resultados mostraron de nuevo la conveniencia de utilizar el BHS exponencial diario, pero en este caso, con la estimación del ADT realizada a partir de las gráficas de los sensores. Mediante la utilización de los datos de humedad del BHS exponencial diario se han realizado comparaciones con el mismo tipo de balance pero utilizando un periodo semanal o mensual en lugar de diario, para conocer las diferencias. Los valores obtenidos con periodicidad mensual han dado valores de AD inferiores a los balances calculados semanalmente o diariamente. Por último se ha comprobado que los resultados de un BHS exponencial diario pueden complementar la información que se obtiene del Índice de Precipitación Estandarizado (SPI) y pueden mejorar el estudio de la sequía agrícola. ABSTRACT Due to the importance of a better knowledge of soil water at real time and in a more precisely way, this research work has being carried out with the main objective of selecting a daily Soil Water Balance (SWB) to estimate soil water content, and validate it in comparison to “in situ” measurements. Three locations, differing in soil and climate characteristics, were selected in central Spain in order to estimate with certain acuity soil water as plant-Available Water (AW) and to serve as a tool for the climatic studies. The selected places near meteorology stations were: Guadalajara/El Serranillo an alluvium of the Henares watershed; Colmenar Viejo/Base Famet, in the south raised area of the Guadarrama river basin, over metamorphic rocks; and Radiosondeo/Madrid (Barajas) in coarse arkosic sandstone. Morphology characterization, physical, chemical and hydrologic soil properties were studied in each area. In Guadalajara the soil is a Typic Xerorthent with a (Ap-AC-C1- C2) genetic horizon sequence, loam-sandy to loam textural class, less than 2% of rock fragments, presence of equivalent CaCO3 through the whole profile, outstanding the vertical and horizontal homogeneity of the properties. In Colmenar the soil is represented by a Dystric Xerorthent with a (A-C-C/R) genetic horizon sequence, the C/R is 20-30 cm deep where rock outcrops are approximately at 30 cm; a characteristic feature of this profile is its high acidity and high rock fragments content. In Radiosondeo the soil is represented by a Typic Haploxeralf, with the usual alfisol genetic horizon sequence (A-Bt1-Bt2-C/Bt); outstanding its horizontal heterogeneity, “the variability of the Bt (clay enriched horizon) depth in short distances”. In a first experimental stage (2007-2008), the daily SWB chosen was that which only uses as input data the information from the meteorology variables and plant-Total Available Water (TAW) for each soil type and depth. Different daily SWB (with exponential or direct plant-Available Water depletion) were applied, using the Penman- Monteith reference evapotranspiration (ETo) recommended by FAO. At the same time as soil water content was estimated from the different daily SWB at the three locations, also soil water content was being monitored by “in situ” gravimetric methodology, adapting it to each soil characteristic, to determine every time soil water content and AW to a depth of 0 to 30 cm. In each sampling date, 5 samples for each depth were taken: 0-10 cm; 10-20 cm and 20-30 cm and the data were submitted to the corresponding statistical analysis. The TAW was calculated based on field capacity (FC) and permanent wilting point (PWP) data obtained from laboratory by the Richards pressure plate. Results from this first experimental stage show that the daily exponential SWB was the one which better estimated the AW in Guadalajara considering field capacity at -33 kPa, though in Colmenar, field capacity at -10 kPa must be considered instead of -33 kPa for a better estimation. In Radiosondeo due to the fact that the Bt horizon depth varied in different sampling dates, it could not be established if the daily exponential SWB had a good performance. In a second experimental stage (20019-2012) and with the objective of minimizing the problems encountered in Radiosondeo for measuring “in situ” soil water content by the gravimetric method, the installation of different sensors for measuring soil water content were established and used in the same field location: TDR (time domain reflectometry - TRIME T3 from IMKO), capacitance FDR (frecuency domain reflectometry - ECH2O EC-20 from DECAGON) and others. This second experimental stage lasted 4 years in order to compare the soil water measures from the sensors with the estimations by the exponential SWB form 0 to 85 cm soil depths. At laboratory, specific calibrations for TDR and FDR sensors of the Typic Haploxeralf more differentiated horizons were done using different types of regressions. The results showed that soil water data obtained by the TDR equipment, corrected by the specific laboratory calibration, best fitted to “in situ” gravimetric soil water measures. In this way TDR was used for comparing to the daily exponential SWB during the four years of this second experimentation stage. Various estimations for obtaining TAW were tested; based on laboratory data – and/or on the data obtained of the soil water content field sensors. Results confirmed again, the convenience of using the daily exponential SWB, though in this case, with the TAW obtained from the field sensors graphics. Soil water estimated by exponential SWB on daily basis was compared to weekly and monthly periods, in order to know their reliability. The results obtained for a monthly period gave less AW than the ones obtained in a weekly or daily period. Finally it has been proved that the results obtained from the exponential SWB in a daily bases can be used as a useful tool in order to give complementary information to the SPI (Precipitation Standardized Index) and to help in agricultural drought studies.

Water use efficiency and water productivity in the Spanish irrigation district ¿Río Adaja?

A study of the assessment of the irrigation water use has been carried out in the Spanish irrigation District “Río Adaja” that has analyzed the water use efficiency and the water productivity indicators for the main crops for three years: 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. A soil water balance model was applied taking into ccount climatic data for the nearby weather station and soil properties. Crop water requirements were calculated by the FAO Penman- Monteith with the application of the dual crop coefficient and by considering the readily vailable soil water content (RAW) concept. Likewise, productivity was measured by the indexes: annual relative irrigation supply (ARIS), annual relative water supply (ARWS), relative rainfall supply (RRS), the water productivity (WP), the evapotranspiration water productivity (ETWP), and the irrigation water productivity (IWP. The results show that in most crops deficit irrigation was applied (ARIS<1) in the first two years however, the IWP improved. This was higher in 2010-2011 which corresponded to the highest effective precipitation Pe. In general, the IWP (€.m-3) varied amongcrops but crops such as: onion (4.14, 1.98 and 2.77 respectively for the three years), potato (2.79, 1.69 and 1.62 respectively for the three years), carrot (1.37, 1.70 and 1.80 respectively for the three years) and barley (1.21, 1.16 and 0.68 respectively for the three years) showed the higher values. Thus, it is highlighted the y could be included into the cropping pattern which would maximize the famer’s gross income in the irrigation district.

Testing of crop Models for Accurate Predictions of Evapotranspiration and crop Water Use

All crop models, whether site-specific or global-gridded and regardless of crop, simulate daily crop transpiration and soil evaporation during the crop life cycle, resulting in seasonal crop water use. Modelers use several methods for predicting daily potential evapotranspiration (ET), including FAO-56, Penman-Monteith, Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves, full energy balance, and transpiration water efficiency. They use extinction equations to partition energy to soil evaporation or transpiration, depending on leaf area index. Most models simulate soil water balance and soil-root water supply for transpiration, and limit transpiration if water uptake is insufficient, and thereafter reduce dry matter production. Comparisons among multiple crop and global gridded models in the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) show surprisingly large differences in simulated ET and crop water use for the same climatic conditions. Model intercomparisons alone are not enough to know which approaches are correct. There is an urgent need to test these models against field-observed data on ET and crop water use. It is important to test various ET modules/equations in a model platform where other aspects such as soil water balance and rooting are held constant, to avoid compensation caused by other parts of models. The CSM-CROPGRO model in DSSAT already has ET equations for Priestley-Taylor, Penman-FAO-24, Penman-Monteith-FAO-56, and an hourly energy balance approach. In this work, we added transpiration-efficiency modules to DSSAT and AgMaize models and tested the various ET equations against available data on ET, soil water balance, and season-long crop water use of soybean, fababean, maize, and other crops where runoff and deep percolation were known or zero. The different ET modules created considerable differences in predicted ET, growth, and yield.

Future reference evapotranspiration in Duero Valley (Spain)

The impact of climate change and its relation with evapotranspiration was evaluated in the Duero River Basin (Spain). The study shows the possible future situations 50 years from now from the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). The maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), dew point (Td), wind speed (U) and net radiation (Rn) trends during the 1980-2009 period were obtained and extrapolated with the FAO-56 Penman- Montheith equation to estimate ETo. Changes in stomatal resistance in response to increases in CO2 were also considered. Four scenarios were done, considering the concentration of CO2 and the period analyzed (annual or monthly). The scenarios studied showed the changes in ETo as a consequence of the annual and monthly trends in the variables Tmax, Tmin, Td, U and Rn with current and future CO2 concentrations (372 ppm and 550 ppm). The future ETo showed increases between 118 mm (11%) and 55 mm (5%) with respect to the current situation of the river basin at 1042 mm. The months most affected by climate change are May, June, July, August and September, which also coincide with the maximum water needs of the basin?s crops

Trends in climatic variables and future reference evapotranspiration in Duero Valley (Spain)

The impact of climate change and its relation with evapotranspiration was evaluated in the Duero River Basin (Spain). The study shows possible future situations 50 yr from now from the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). The maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), dew point (Td), wind speed (U) and net radiation (Rn) trends during the 1980–2009 period were obtained and extrapolated with the FAO-56 Penman-Montheith equation to estimate ETo. Changes in stomatal resistance in response to increases in CO2 were also considered. Four scenarios were done, taking the concentration of CO2 and the period analyzed (annual or monthly) into consideration. The scenarios studied showed the changes in ETo as a consequence of the annual and monthly trends in the variables Tmax, Tmin, Td, U and Rn with current and future CO2 concentrations (372 ppm and 550 ppm). The future ETo showed increases between 118 mm (11 %) and 55 mm (5 %) with respect to the current situation of the river basin at 1042 mm. The months most affected by climate change are May, June, July, August and September, which also coincide with the maximum water needs of the basin’s crops

Improving Crop Models: Incorporating New Processes, New Approaches, and Better Calibrations

Early ancestors of crop simulation models (De Wit, 1965; Monteith, 1965; Duncan et al., 1967) were born before primitive personal computers were available (e.g. Apple II released in 1977, IBM PC released in 1981). Paleo-computer programs were run in mainframes with the support of punch cards. As computers became more available and powerful, crop models evolved into sophisticated tools summarizing our understanding of how crops operate. This evolution was triggered by the need to answer new scientific questions and improve the accuracy of model simulations, especially under limiting conditions.