4 resultados para James Petras, Hugo Chavez, Mass-Media
em Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Resumo:
The magazine of the Spanish Nuclear Society (SNE), “Nuclear España” is a scientific-technical publication with almost thirty years of uninterrupted edition and more than 300 numbers published. Their pages approach technical subjects related to the nuclear energy, as well as the activities developed by the SNE, especially in national and international meetings. The main part of the magazine is composed by articles written by known specialist of the energy industry. One of the top goals of the magazine is to help on transferring the knowledge from the generation that built the nuclear power plants in Spain and the new generation of professionals that have started its nuclear career in the last years. Each number is monographic, trying to cover as many aspects on an issue as it is possible, with collaborations from the companies, the research centers and universities that helps to have complementary points of view. On the other hand the articles help to deep in the issue´s topic, broadening the view of the readers about the nuclear field and helping to share knowledge across the industry. The news section of the Magazine picks up the actuality of the sector as a whole. The editorial section reflects the opinion of the SNE Governing Board and the Magazine Committee on the subjects of interest in this field. On the other hand, the monthly interview sets out the professional outstanding opinions. With a total of eleven numbers per year, three of them have a noticeable international character: the one dedicated to the operative experiences on the Spanish and European nuclear power plants, the monographic issue devoted tothe Annual Meeting of the SNE and the international issue, which covers the last activities of the Spanish industry in international projects. Both first are bilingual issues (Spanish-English), whereas the international edition is published completely in English. Besides its diffusion through all the members of the SNE, the Magazine is distributed, in the national scope, to companies and organisms related to the nuclear power, universities, research centers, representatives of the Central, Autonomic and Local Administrations, mass media and communication professionals. It is also sent to the utilities and research centers in Europe, United States, South America and Asia.
Resumo:
Las distintas encuestas realizadas sobre la percepción social de la ciencia indican que un alto porcentaje de jóvenes no tienen interés por estas materias. Es muy importante la alfabetización científica de la población ya que ello permite tomar decisiones tanto para la vida cotidiana como sobre distintos problemas que afectan al conjunto de la sociedad. Una sociedad con más conocimiento científico--‐tecnológico lleva asociado un mayor crecimiento económico, pero desafortunadamente nos encontramos con una disminución del número de alumnos que elige estudios de Ciencia y Tecnología. Este desinterés viene influenciado tanto por factores internos al estudiante como por externos. Desde la posición docente podemos actuar sobre ellos promoviendo actividades relacionadas con la divulgación científico--‐tecnológica en clase haciendo uso de medios de comunicación que ofrezcan información procedente de fuentes fiables (prensa escrita, radio, televisión y cibermedios/web 2.0). La propuesta metodológica planteada aquí ayudará a ampliar la alfabetización científico--‐tecnológica a través de la exploración del trabajo de los investigadores actuales y de las biografías de los científicos de otras épocas. Además los alumnos crearán de forma colaborativa material propio para divulgar la Ciencia y la Tecnología en el aula. La propuesta se sitúa en el curso 1º de ESO, pero con perspectivas de extenderla en cursos sucesivos al resto de secundaria y bachillerato adaptando los contenidos . Con este trabajo pretendemos contribuir a incrementar el interés por la Ciencia y la Tecnología en el alumnado de secundaria y bachillerato. ABSTRACT The different surveys conducted in order to analyse the social perception of science show that a high percentage of young people is not interested in these subjects. The level of scientific literacy in the population is very important because it allows people to make their own decisions not only for life management skills but also for coping with the diverse problems that may affect the whole society. A society with more scientific and technological knowledge has attached a higher economic growth, but unfortunately there is a reduction in the number of students that choose Science and Tech studies. This lack of interest is influenced by the student’s internal factors as well as by the external ones. From the teacher’s point of view, it is possible to act on them, promoting activities related to scientific and technological broadcasting in the class, using mass media which can provide information from reliable sources (press, radio, television and media on the Internet/web 2.0) The methodological proposal that is made here will help to broaden scientific literacy through exploring the current researcher’s studies and the former scientifics’ biographies. Students will also create their own material in a collaborative way in order to divulgate science and technology in the classroom. The proposal is set for the first grade of secondary education, but we have in prospect to spread it during the following school years to the rest of secondary education grades and A levels only adapting its content. With this essay we want to contribute to the increasing of the interest in science and technology in high school and A levels students.
Resumo:
El presente trabajo aborda el análisis de la idea de monumentalidad, así como el diseño y la construcción de monumentos concretos, a la finalización de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, prestando especial atención al intento del Movimiento Moderno de introducirse en un campo que hasta entonces le había sido ajeno. Entendiendo que el monumento es ante todo un artefacto para la memoria, y analizando las teorías de sociólogos como Émile Durkheim, Maurice Halbwachs, Jan Assmann o Iwona Irwin-Zarecka, la tesis se propone explicar el papel que juegan los monumentos en la creación de una memoria colectiva que, a diferencia de la historia, es una recopilación selectiva de acontecimientos del pasado cuyo fin es procurar y celebrar la permanencia del grupo social. También se propone analizar el papel del monumento como elemento de estabilidad en el paisaje urbano que genera de forma natural el apego de los ciudadanos, puesto que forma parte destacada del marco espacial en el que se han desarrollado sus vidas. Desde estas dos facetas se pretende justificar la necesidad de monumentos que experimenta cualquier grupo social, y por qué las guerras, que ponen en peligro la estructura, e incluso la propia vida del grupo, son acontecimientos que generan una tendencia especial a la construcción de monumentos que conjuren el peligro al que éste se ha visto sometido. Se explicarán las razones por las que la conmemoración de la Segunda Guerra Mundial se volvió especialmente problemática. Entre las principales, la desaparición de fronteras entre frente y retaguardia, entre objetivos militares y civiles; por otra parte la despersonalización de la acción bélica como consecuencia de la aplicación de la tecnología; en tercer lugar el papel de los medios de comunicación de masas, que por primera vez en la historia irrumpieron de forma masiva en una guerra, y ofrecían imágenes instantáneas, más impactantes y con un aura de realidad con la que el monumento convencional no era capaz de competir; en cuarto lugar el inicio de la era atómica, que enfrentaba por primera vez a la humanidad a la posibilidad de su destrucción total; y finalmente la experiencia del Holocausto, en cuanto que aniquilación carente de objetivo e ideología, que se servía del progreso de la ciencia para ganar en eficiencia, y que puso de manifiesto la manipulabilidad de la tecnología al servicio de unos intereses particulares. Como respuesta a esta dificultad para la conmemoración, se popularizaron dos fórmulas hasta entonces marginales que podemos considerar características del momento: una de ellas es el living memorial, que trataba de ofrecer una lectura constructiva de la guerra poniendo de relieve determinadas funciones prácticas de carácter democrático, cultural, deportivo, etc. que se presentaban como los frutos por los que se había combatido en la guerra. En esta fórmula es donde el Movimiento Moderno encontró la posibilidad de abordar nuevos proyectos, en los que la función estaba presente pero no era el ingrediente determinante, lo que obligaría a un enriquecimiento del lenguaje con el que responder a la dimensión emotiva del monumento. Y si bien hay en esta época edificios modernos que podemos calificar justamente de monumentos, el desplazamiento del centro del debate teórico hacia cuestiones estilísticas y expresivas limitó considerablemente la claridad de los enunciados anteriores y la posibilidad de consenso. Dentro de los living memorials, las sedes de la Organización de Naciones Unidas y sus correspondientes agencias representaron la mayor esperanza del Movimiento Moderno por construir un auténtico monumento. Sin embargo, el sistema de trabajo en grupo, con su correspondiente conflicto de personalidades, la ausencia de proyección de los edificios sobre el espacio urbano anexo, y sobre todo el propio descrédito que comenzaron a sufrir las instituciones con el comienzo de la Guerra Fría, frustraron esta posibilidad. La segunda fórmula conmemorativa sería el monumento de advertencia o mahnmal, que renuncia a cualquier rasgo de heroísmo o romanticismo, y se concentra simplemente en advertir de los riesgos que implica la guerra. Dicha fórmula se aplicó fundamentalmente en los países vencidos, y generalmente no por iniciativa propia, sino como imposición de los vencedores, que de alguna forma aprovechaban la ocasión para hacer examen de conciencia lejos de la opinión pública de sus respectivos países. ABSTRACT This paper explores the idea of monumentality through the analysis of the design and construction of several monuments at the end ofWorldWar II. It pays particular attention to the attempt of the Modern Movement to enter a field that had been ignored until this moment. With the assumption that a monument is primarily a mnemonic device, this thesis focuses on the thinking of sociologists like Émile Durkheim, Maurice Halbwachs, Jan Assmann or Iwona Irwin-Zarecka, with the aim of explaining the role of monuments in the creation of a collective memory which, unlike history, consists of past events selected in order to secure and celebrate the permanence of a social group. It also considers the role of monuments as elements of stability in the urban landscape that naturally get assimilated by society, since they are prominent elements in the shared spaces of daily life. These two features explain the need felt by any society for monuments, and how wars, events that endanger the structure and even the existence of that same society, generate a special tendency to build monuments to conjure that inherent danger. The reasons why the memorializing of World War II became especially problematic will be explained. Primary among them is the blurring of boundaries between the front line and the domestic front, between military and civilian targets; moreover, the depersonalization of warfare as a result of advances in technology; thirdly, the role of mass media, which for the first time in history extensively covered a war, instantly broadcasting images of such power and with such an aura of reality that conventional monuments became obsolete; fourthly, the beginning of the atomic age, which meant that mankind faced the possibility of complete destruction; and finally the Holocaust, a racial annihilation devoid of purpose and ideology, which took advantage of scientific progress to gain efficiency, manipulating technology to serve particular interests. In response to this difficulty in commemorating wars, two formulas hitherto marginal gained such popularity as to become prototypes: one was the living memorial, offering a constructive reading of the war by hosting certain practical functions of democratic, cultural or sporting nature. Living memorials presented themselves as the image of the outcome for which the war had been fought. The Modern Movement found in this formula the opportunity for tackling new projects, in which function was present but not as the determining ingredient; in turn, they would require an enhancement of language in order to account for the emotional dimension of the monument. And while there are modern buildings at this time that we can justly describe as monuments, the displacement of the focus of the theoretical debate to stylistic and expressive issues considerably limited the clarity of previous statements and the possibility of consensus. Among all living memorials, the headquarters of the United Nations Organization and its satellite agencies represented the ultimate hope of the Modern Movement to build an authentic monument. However, the group-based design process, the fight of egos it caused, the lack of presence of these buildings over the adjacent urban space, and especially the very discredit that these institutions began to suffer with the onset of the Cold War, all thwarted this expectation. The second commemorative formula was the warning monument or Mahnmal, which rejects any trace of heroism or romanticism, and simply focuses on warning about the risks of war. This formula was mainly used in defeated countries, and generally not on their own initiative, but as an imposition of the victors, which seized the opportunity to do some soul-searching far away from the public opinion of their respective countries.
Resumo:
In the EU context extraction of shale and oil gas by hydraulic fracturing (fracking) differs from country to country in terms of legislation and implementation. While fossil fuel extraction using this technology is currently taking place in the UK, Germany and France have adopted respective moratoria. In between is the Spanish case, where hydrocarbon extraction projects through fracking have to undergo mandatory and routine environmental assessment in accordance with the last changes to environmental regulations. Nowadays Spain is at the crossroad with respect to the future of this technology. We presume a social conflictt in our country since the position and strategy of the involved and confronted social actors -national, regional and local authorities, energy companies, scientists, NGO and other social organization- are going to play key and likely divergent roles in its industrial implementation and public acceptance. In order to improve knowledge on how to address these controverted situations from the own engineering context, the affiliated units from the Higher Technical School of Mines and Energy Engineering at UPM have been working on a transversal program to teach values and ethics. Over the past seven years, this pioneering experience has shown the usefulness of applying a consequentialist ethics, based on a case-by-case approach and costs-benefits analysis both for action and inaction. As a result of this initiative a theoretical concept has arisen and crystallized in this field: it is named Inter-ethics. This theoretical perspective can be very helpful in complex situations, with multi-stakeholders and plurality of interests, when ethical management requires the interaction between the respective ethics of each group; professional ethics of a single group is not enough. Under this inter-ethics theoretical framework and applying content analysis techniques, this paper explores the articulation of the discourse in favour and against fracking technology and its underlying values as manifested in the Spanish traditional mass media and emerging social media such as Youtube. Results show that Spanish public discourse on fracking technology includes the costs-benefits analysis to communicate how natural resources from local communities may be affected by these facilities due to environmental, health and economic consequences. Furthermore, this technology is represented as a solution to the "demand of energy" according to the optimistic discourse while, from a pessimistic view, fracking is often framed as a source "environmental problems" and even natural disasters as possible earthquakes. In this latter case, this negative representation could have been influenced by the closure of a macro project to store injected natural gas in the Mediterranean Sea using the old facilities of an oil exploitation in Amposta (Proyecto Cástor). The closure of this project was due to the occurrence of earthquakes whose intensity was higher than the originally expected by the experts in the assessment stage of the project.