Hybridizing concentrated solar power (CSP) with biogas and biomethane as an alternative to natural gas: Analysis of environmental performance using LCA

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plants typically incorporate one or various auxiliary boilers operating in parallel to the solar field to facilitate start up operations, provide system stability, avoid freezing of heat transfer fluid (HTF) and increase generation capacity. The environmental performance of these plants is highly influenced by the energy input and the type of auxiliary fuel, which in most cases is natural gas (NG). Replacing the NG with biogas or biomethane (BM) in commercial CSP installations is being considered as a means to produce electricity that is fully renewable and free from fossil inputs. Despite their renewable nature, the use of these biofuels also generates environmental impacts that need to be adequately identified and quantified. This paper investigates the environmental performance of a commercial wet-cooled parabolic trough 50 MWe CSP plant in Spain operating according to two strategies: solar-only, with minimum technically viable energy non-solar contribution; and hybrid operation, where 12 % of the electricity derives from auxiliary fuels (as permitted by Spanish legislation). The analysis was based on standard Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology (ISO 14040-14040). The technical viability and the environmental profile of operating the CSP plant with different auxiliary fuels was evaluated, including: NG; biogas from an adjacent plant; and BM withdrawn from the gas network. The effect of using different substrates (biowaste, sewage sludge, grass and a mix of biowaste with animal manure) for the production of the biofuels was also investigated. The results showed that NG is responsible for most of the environmental damage associated with the operation of the plant in hybrid mode. Replacing NG with biogas resulted in a significant improvement of the environmental performance of the installation, primarily due to reduced impact in the following categories: natural land transformation, depletion of fossil resources, and climate change. However, despite the renewable nature of the biofuels, other environmental categories like human toxicity, eutrophication, acidification and marine ecotoxicity scored higher when using biogas and BM.

Life cycle assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) and the influence of hybridising with natural gas

Purpose Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plants based on parabolic troughs utilize auxiliary fuels (usually natural gas) to facilitate start-up operations, avoid freezing of HTF and increase power output. This practice has a significant effect on the environmental performance of the technology. The aim of this paper is to quantify the sustainability of CSP and to analyse how this is affected by hybridisation with different natural gas (NG) inputs. Methods A complete Life Cycle (LC) inventory was gathered for a commercial wet-cooled 50 MWe CSP plant based on parabolic troughs. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the environmental performance of the plant operating with different NG inputs (between 0 and 35% of gross electricity generation). ReCiPe Europe (H) was used as LCA methodology. CML 2 baseline 2000 World and ReCiPe Europe E were used for comparative purposes. Cumulative Energy Demands (CED) and Energy Payback Times (EPT) were also determined for each scenario. Results and discussion Operation of CSP using solar energy only produced the following environmental profile: climate change 26.6 kg CO2 eq/KWh, human toxicity 13.1 kg 1,4-DB eq/KWh, marine ecotoxicity 276 g 1,4-DB eq/KWh, natural land transformation 0.005 m2/KWh, eutrophication 10.1 g P eq/KWh, acidification 166 g SO2 eq/KWh. Most of these impacts are associated with extraction of raw materials and manufacturing of plant components. The utilization NG transformed the environmental profile of the technology, placing increasing weight on impacts related to its operation and maintenance. Significantly higher impacts were observed on categories like climate change (311 kg CO2 eq/MWh when using 35 % NG), natural land transformation, terrestrial acidification and fossil depletion. Despite its fossil nature, the use of NG had a beneficial effect on other impact categories (human and marine toxicity, freshwater eutrophication and natural land transformation) due to the higher electricity output achieved. The overall environmental performance of CSP significantly deteriorated with the use of NG (single score 3.52 pt in solar only operation compared to 36.1 pt when using 35 % NG). Other sustainability parameters like EPT and CED also increased substantially as a result of higher NG inputs. Quasilinear second-degree polynomial relationships were calculated between various environmental performance parameters and NG contributions. Conclusions Energy input from auxiliary NG determines the environmental profile of the CSP plant. Aggregated analysis shows a deleterious effect on the overall environmental performance of the technology as a result of NG utilization. This is due primarily to higher impacts on environmental categories like climate change, natural land transformation, fossil fuel depletion and terrestrial acidification. NG may be used in a more sustainable and cost-effective manner in combined cycle power plants, which achieve higher energy conversion efficiencies.

Caracterización y análisis comparativo del comportamiento medioambiental de los materiales de aislamiento térmico utilizados en la envolvente del edificio, en función del sistema constructivo y de la situación geográfica

La construcción es uno de los causantes de mayor impacto ambiental y energético en el entorno. Por ello, los profesionales del sector deben empezar a cambiar la manera en la que diseñan la arquitectura, incorporando técnicas y parámetros sostenibles desde las primeras etapas del diseño, controlando la elección de los materiales y las soluciones constructivas. A través de las Declaraciones Ambientales de Producto (DAP) es posible conocer el perfil ambiental de los productos de la construcción, sin embargo, la mayoría de estos documentos solo poseen información de la etapa de producto (A1-A3) y de la etapa de fin de vida, contemplando solo un tipo de tratamiento (vertedero o incineración). Lo que propone esta investigación es generar información medioambiental del resto de las etapas del ciclo de vida relacionado con el producto, haciendo especial hincapié en la etapa de transporte (A4), puesta en obra (A5), transporte de obra a planta de tratamiento (C2) y etapa de fin de vida con vertedero e incineración. Para la realización de la investigación se ha generado un Inventario de Ciclo de Vida (ICV) con valores medios facilitados por las empresas. El ámbito de actuación es la península ibérica, considerándose un transporte en camión. La evaluación ambiental se ha realizado con la herramienta informática SimaPro (versión 7.3.3). Para los procesos que no han podido ser modelizados por falta de información, se ha recurrido a la base de datos Ecoinvent (versión 2.0). Las categorías de impacto analizadas son las contempladas en la UNE-EN ISO 15804+A1. Con esta investigación se propone una catalogación medioambiental del material de aislamiento térmico según los impactos asociados al transporte, puesta en obra y fin de vida del producto para que el prescriptor pueda escoger qué material es el más adecuado a incorporar en el proyecto, desde el punto de vista medioambiental. ABSTRACT _ Construction is one of the main causes of environmental and energy impacts in the environment. Therefore, the professionals of the sector should begin changing the way they design architecture, incorporating sustainable techniques and parameters from the first design stages, controlling the choice of materials and building solutions. It is possible to know the environmental profile of construction products through Environmental Product Declarations (EPD). However, most of these documents only provide information for the product stage (A1-A3) and the end-of-life stage, taking into account only one type of treatment (landfill or incineration). This research proposes the generation of environmental information for the rest of the life cycle stages related to the product, with particular emphasis on the transportstage (A4), construction installation (A5), transport from the construction site to the recycling facilities (C2) and end-of-life stage with landfill and incineration. A Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) has been generated for the development of the research, with mean values provided by the firms. The scope of action is the Iberian Peninsula, considering transport by lorry. The environmental assessment has been carried out with the SimaPro software (version 7.3.3). The Ecoinvent database (version 2.0) has been used for the processes that couldn’t be modelled due to lack of information. The impact categories analysed are those considered in standard UNE-EN ISO 15804+A1. This research proposes an environmental cataloguing of the thermal insulation material depending on the impacts associated with transport, construction installation and end-of-life of the product so that the prescriber might choose which material is the most suitable to implement in the project from an environmental point of view.