4 resultados para ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRS
em Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Resumo:
The intermediate band solar cell [1] has been proposed as a concept able to substantially enhance the efficiency limit of an ordinary single junction solar cell. If a band permitted for electrons is inserted within the forbidden band of a semiconductor then a novel path for photo generation is open: electron hole pairs may be formed by the successive absorption of two sub band gap photons using the intermediate band (IB) as a stepping stone. While the increase of the photovoltaic (PV) current is not a big achievement —it suffices to reduce the band gap— the achievement of this extra current at high voltage is the key of the IB concept. In ordinary cells the voltage is limited by the band gap so that reducing it would also reduce the band gap. In the intermediate band solar cell the high voltage is produced when the IB is permitted to have a Quasi Fermi Level (QFL) different from those of the Conduction Band (CB) and the Valence Band (VB). For it the cell must be properly isolated from the external contacts, which is achieved by putting the IB material between two n- and p-type ordinary semiconductors [2]. Efficiency thermodynamic limit of 63% is obtained for the IB solar cell1 vs. the 40% obtained [3] for ordinary single junction solar cells. Detailed information about the IB solar cells can be found elsewhere [4].
Resumo:
Using photocatalysis for energy applications depends, more than for environmental purposes or selective chemical synthesis, on converting as much of the solar spectrum as possible; the best photocatalyst, titania, is far from this. Many efforts are pursued to use better that spectrum in photocatalysis, by doping titania or using other materials (mainly oxides, nitrides and sulphides) to obtain a lower bandgap, even if this means decreasing the chemical potential of the electron-hole pairs. Here we introduce an alternative scheme, using an idea recently proposed for photovoltaics: the intermediate band (IB) materials. It consists in introducing in the gap of a semiconductor an intermediate level which, acting like a stepstone, allows an electron jumping from the valence band to the conduction band in two steps, each one absorbing one sub-bandgap photon. For this the IB must be partially filled, to allow both sub-bandgap transitions to proceed at comparable rates; must be made of delocalized states to minimize nonradiative recombination; and should not communicate electronically with the outer world. For photovoltaic use the optimum efficiency so achievable, over 1.5 times that given by a normal semiconductor, is obtained with an overall bandgap around 2.0 eV (which would be near-optimal also for water phtosplitting). Note that this scheme differs from the doping principle usually considered in photocatalysis, which just tries to decrease the bandgap; its aim is to keep the full bandgap chemical potential but using also lower energy photons. In the past we have proposed several IB materials based on extensively doping known semiconductors with light transition metals, checking first of all with quantum calculations that the desired IB structure results. Subsequently we have synthesized in powder form two of them: the thiospinel In2S3 and the layered compound SnS2 (having bandgaps of 2.0 and 2.2 eV respectively) where the octahedral cation is substituted at a â?10% level with vanadium, and we have verified that this substitution introduces in the absorption spectrum the sub-bandgap features predicted by the calculations. With these materials we have verified, using a simple reaction (formic acid oxidation), that the photocatalytic spectral response is indeed extended to longer wavelengths, being able to use even 700 nm photons, without largely degrading the response for above-bandgap photons (i.e. strong recombination is not induced) [3b, 4]. These materials are thus promising for efficient photoevolution of hydrogen from water; work on this is being pursued, the results of which will be presented.
Resumo:
We introduce one trivial but puzzling solar cell structure. It consists of a high bandgap pn junction (top cell) grown on a substrate of lower bandgap. Let us assume, for example, that the bandgap of the top cell is 1.85 eV (Al 0.3Ga 0.7As) and the bandgap of the substrate is 1.42 eV (GaAs). Is the open-circuit of the top cell limited to 1.42 V or to 1.85 V? If the answer is ldquo1.85 Vrdquo we could then make the mind experiment in which we illuminate the cell with 1.5 eV photons (notice these photons would only be absorbed in the substrate). If we admit that these photons can generate photocurrent, then because we have also admitted that the voltage is limited to 1.85 V, it might be possible that the electron-hole pairs generated by these photons were extracted at 1.6 V for example. However, if we do so, the principles of thermodynamics could be violated because we would be extracting more energy from the photon than the energy it initially had. How can we then solve this puzzle?
Resumo:
La astronomía de rayos γ estudia las partículas más energéticas que llegan a la Tierra desde el espacio. Estos rayos γ no se generan mediante procesos térmicos en simples estrellas, sino mediante mecanismos de aceleración de partículas en objetos celestes como núcleos de galaxias activos, púlsares, supernovas, o posibles procesos de aniquilación de materia oscura. Los rayos γ procedentes de estos objetos y sus características proporcionan una valiosa información con la que los científicos tratan de comprender los procesos físicos que ocurren en ellos y desarrollar modelos teóricos que describan su funcionamiento con fidelidad. El problema de observar rayos γ es que son absorbidos por las capas altas de la atmósfera y no llegan a la superficie (de lo contrario, la Tierra será inhabitable). De este modo, sólo hay dos formas de observar rayos γ embarcar detectores en satélites, u observar los efectos secundarios que los rayos γ producen en la atmósfera. Cuando un rayo γ llega a la atmósfera, interacciona con las partículas del aire y genera un par electrón - positrón, con mucha energía. Estas partículas secundarias generan a su vez más partículas secundarias cada vez menos energéticas. Estas partículas, mientras aún tienen energía suficiente para viajar más rápido que la velocidad de la luz en el aire, producen una radiación luminosa azulada conocida como radiación Cherenkov durante unos pocos nanosegundos. Desde la superficie de la Tierra, algunos telescopios especiales, conocidos como telescopios Cherenkov o IACTs (Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes), son capaces de detectar la radiación Cherenkov e incluso de tomar imágenes de la forma de la cascada Cherenkov. A partir de estas imágenes es posible conocer las principales características del rayo γ original, y con suficientes rayos se pueden deducir características importantes del objeto que los emitió, a cientos de años luz de distancia. Sin embargo, detectar cascadas Cherenkov procedentes de rayos γ no es nada fácil. Las cascadas generadas por fotones γ de bajas energías emiten pocos fotones, y durante pocos nanosegundos, y las correspondientes a rayos γ de alta energía, si bien producen más electrones y duran más, son más improbables conforme mayor es su energía. Esto produce dos líneas de desarrollo de telescopios Cherenkov: Para observar cascadas de bajas energías son necesarios grandes reflectores que recuperen muchos fotones de los pocos que tienen estas cascadas. Por el contrario, las cascadas de altas energías se pueden detectar con telescopios pequeños, pero conviene cubrir con ellos una superficie grande en el suelo para aumentar el número de eventos detectados. Con el objetivo de mejorar la sensibilidad de los telescopios Cherenkov actuales, en el rango de energía alto (> 10 TeV), medio (100 GeV - 10 TeV) y bajo (10 GeV - 100 GeV), nació el proyecto CTA (Cherenkov Telescope Array). Este proyecto en el que participan más de 27 países, pretende construir un observatorio en cada hemisferio, cada uno de los cuales contará con 4 telescopios grandes (LSTs), unos 30 medianos (MSTs) y hasta 70 pequeños (SSTs). Con un array así, se conseguirán dos objetivos. En primer lugar, al aumentar drásticamente el área de colección respecto a los IACTs actuales, se detectarán más rayos γ en todos los rangos de energía. En segundo lugar, cuando una misma cascada Cherenkov es observada por varios telescopios a la vez, es posible analizarla con mucha más precisión gracias a las técnicas estereoscópicas. La presente tesis recoge varios desarrollos técnicos realizados como aportación a los telescopios medianos y grandes de CTA, concretamente al sistema de trigger. Al ser las cascadas Cherenkov tan breves, los sistemas que digitalizan y leen los datos de cada píxel tienen que funcionar a frecuencias muy altas (≈1 GHz), lo que hace inviable que funcionen de forma continua, ya que la cantidad de datos guardada será inmanejable. En su lugar, las señales analógicas se muestrean, guardando las muestras analógicas en un buffer circular de unos pocos µs. Mientras las señales se mantienen en el buffer, el sistema de trigger hace un análisis rápido de las señales recibidas, y decide si la imagen que hay en el buér corresponde a una cascada Cherenkov y merece ser guardada, o por el contrario puede ignorarse permitiendo que el buffer se sobreescriba. La decisión de si la imagen merece ser guardada o no, se basa en que las cascadas Cherenkov producen detecciones de fotones en píxeles cercanos y en tiempos muy próximos, a diferencia de los fotones de NSB (night sky background), que llegan aleatoriamente. Para detectar cascadas grandes es suficiente con comprobar que más de un cierto número de píxeles en una región hayan detectado más de un cierto número de fotones en una ventana de tiempo de algunos nanosegundos. Sin embargo, para detectar cascadas pequeñas es más conveniente tener en cuenta cuántos fotones han sido detectados en cada píxel (técnica conocida como sumtrigger). El sistema de trigger desarrollado en esta tesis pretende optimizar la sensibilidad a bajas energías, por lo que suma analógicamente las señales recibidas en cada píxel en una región de trigger y compara el resultado con un umbral directamente expresable en fotones detectados (fotoelectrones). El sistema diseñado permite utilizar regiones de trigger de tamaño seleccionable entre 14, 21 o 28 píxeles (2, 3, o 4 clusters de 7 píxeles cada uno), y con un alto grado de solapamiento entre ellas. De este modo, cualquier exceso de luz en una región compacta de 14, 21 o 28 píxeles es detectado y genera un pulso de trigger. En la versión más básica del sistema de trigger, este pulso se distribuye por toda la cámara de forma que todos los clusters sean leídos al mismo tiempo, independientemente de su posición en la cámara, a través de un delicado sistema de distribución. De este modo, el sistema de trigger guarda una imagen completa de la cámara cada vez que se supera el número de fotones establecido como umbral en una región de trigger. Sin embargo, esta forma de operar tiene dos inconvenientes principales. En primer lugar, la cascada casi siempre ocupa sólo una pequeña zona de la cámara, por lo que se guardan muchos píxeles sin información alguna. Cuando se tienen muchos telescopios como será el caso de CTA, la cantidad de información inútil almacenada por este motivo puede ser muy considerable. Por otro lado, cada trigger supone guardar unos pocos nanosegundos alrededor del instante de disparo. Sin embargo, en el caso de cascadas grandes la duración de las mismas puede ser bastante mayor, perdiéndose parte de la información debido al truncamiento temporal. Para resolver ambos problemas se ha propuesto un esquema de trigger y lectura basado en dos umbrales. El umbral alto decide si hay un evento en la cámara y, en caso positivo, sólo las regiones de trigger que superan el nivel bajo son leídas, durante un tiempo más largo. De este modo se evita guardar información de píxeles vacíos y las imágenes fijas de las cascadas se pueden convertir en pequeños \vídeos" que representen el desarrollo temporal de la cascada. Este nuevo esquema recibe el nombre de COLIBRI (Concept for an Optimized Local Image Building and Readout Infrastructure), y se ha descrito detalladamente en el capítulo 5. Un problema importante que afecta a los esquemas de sumtrigger como el que se presenta en esta tesis es que para sumar adecuadamente las señales provenientes de cada píxel, estas deben tardar lo mismo en llegar al sumador. Los fotomultiplicadores utilizados en cada píxel introducen diferentes retardos que deben compensarse para realizar las sumas adecuadamente. El efecto de estos retardos ha sido estudiado, y se ha desarrollado un sistema para compensarlos. Por último, el siguiente nivel de los sistemas de trigger para distinguir efectivamente las cascadas Cherenkov del NSB consiste en buscar triggers simultáneos (o en tiempos muy próximos) en telescopios vecinos. Con esta función, junto con otras de interfaz entre sistemas, se ha desarrollado un sistema denominado Trigger Interface Board (TIB). Este sistema consta de un módulo que irá montado en la cámara de cada LST o MST, y que estará conectado mediante fibras ópticas a los telescopios vecinos. Cuando un telescopio tiene un trigger local, este se envía a todos los vecinos conectados y viceversa, de modo que cada telescopio sabe si sus vecinos han dado trigger. Una vez compensadas las diferencias de retardo debidas a la propagación en las fibras ópticas y de los propios fotones Cherenkov en el aire dependiendo de la dirección de apuntamiento, se buscan coincidencias, y en el caso de que la condición de trigger se cumpla, se lee la cámara en cuestión, de forma sincronizada con el trigger local. Aunque todo el sistema de trigger es fruto de la colaboración entre varios grupos, fundamentalmente IFAE, CIEMAT, ICC-UB y UCM en España, con la ayuda de grupos franceses y japoneses, el núcleo de esta tesis son el Level 1 y la Trigger Interface Board, que son los dos sistemas en los que que el autor ha sido el ingeniero principal. Por este motivo, en la presente tesis se ha incluido abundante información técnica relativa a estos sistemas. Existen actualmente importantes líneas de desarrollo futuras relativas tanto al trigger de la cámara (implementación en ASICs), como al trigger entre telescopios (trigger topológico), que darán lugar a interesantes mejoras sobre los diseños actuales durante los próximos años, y que con suerte serán de provecho para toda la comunidad científica participante en CTA. ABSTRACT -ray astronomy studies the most energetic particles arriving to the Earth from outer space. This -rays are not generated by thermal processes in mere stars, but by means of particle acceleration mechanisms in astronomical objects such as active galactic nuclei, pulsars, supernovas or as a result of dark matter annihilation processes. The γ rays coming from these objects and their characteristics provide with valuable information to the scientist which try to understand the underlying physical fundamentals of these objects, as well as to develop theoretical models able to describe them accurately. The problem when observing rays is that they are absorbed in the highest layers of the atmosphere, so they don't reach the Earth surface (otherwise the planet would be uninhabitable). Therefore, there are only two possible ways to observe γ rays: by using detectors on-board of satellites, or by observing their secondary effects in the atmosphere. When a γ ray reaches the atmosphere, it interacts with the particles in the air generating a highly energetic electron-positron pair. These secondary particles generate in turn more particles, with less energy each time. While these particles are still energetic enough to travel faster than the speed of light in the air, they produce a bluish radiation known as Cherenkov light during a few nanoseconds. From the Earth surface, some special telescopes known as Cherenkov telescopes or IACTs (Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes), are able to detect the Cherenkov light and even to take images of the Cherenkov showers. From these images it is possible to know the main parameters of the original -ray, and with some -rays it is possible to deduce important characteristics of the emitting object, hundreds of light-years away. However, detecting Cherenkov showers generated by γ rays is not a simple task. The showers generated by low energy -rays contain few photons and last few nanoseconds, while the ones corresponding to high energy -rays, having more photons and lasting more time, are much more unlikely. This results in two clearly differentiated development lines for IACTs: In order to detect low energy showers, big reflectors are required to collect as much photons as possible from the few ones that these showers have. On the contrary, small telescopes are able to detect high energy showers, but a large area in the ground should be covered to increase the number of detected events. With the aim to improve the sensitivity of current Cherenkov showers in the high (> 10 TeV), medium (100 GeV - 10 TeV) and low (10 GeV - 100 GeV) energy ranges, the CTA (Cherenkov Telescope Array) project was created. This project, with more than 27 participating countries, intends to build an observatory in each hemisphere, each one equipped with 4 large size telescopes (LSTs), around 30 middle size telescopes (MSTs) and up to 70 small size telescopes (SSTs). With such an array, two targets would be achieved. First, the drastic increment in the collection area with respect to current IACTs will lead to detect more -rays in all the energy ranges. Secondly, when a Cherenkov shower is observed by several telescopes at the same time, it is possible to analyze it much more accurately thanks to the stereoscopic techniques. The present thesis gathers several technical developments for the trigger system of the medium and large size telescopes of CTA. As the Cherenkov showers are so short, the digitization and readout systems corresponding to each pixel must work at very high frequencies (_ 1 GHz). This makes unfeasible to read data continuously, because the amount of data would be unmanageable. Instead, the analog signals are sampled, storing the analog samples in a temporal ring buffer able to store up to a few _s. While the signals remain in the buffer, the trigger system performs a fast analysis of the signals and decides if the image in the buffer corresponds to a Cherenkov shower and deserves to be stored, or on the contrary it can be ignored allowing the buffer to be overwritten. The decision of saving the image or not, is based on the fact that Cherenkov showers produce photon detections in close pixels during near times, in contrast to the random arrival of the NSB phtotons. Checking if more than a certain number of pixels in a trigger region have detected more than a certain number of photons during a certain time window is enough to detect large showers. However, taking also into account how many photons have been detected in each pixel (sumtrigger technique) is more convenient to optimize the sensitivity to low energy showers. The developed trigger system presented in this thesis intends to optimize the sensitivity to low energy showers, so it performs the analog addition of the signals received in each pixel in the trigger region and compares the sum with a threshold which can be directly expressed as a number of detected photons (photoelectrons). The trigger system allows to select trigger regions of 14, 21, or 28 pixels (2, 3 or 4 clusters with 7 pixels each), and with extensive overlapping. In this way, every light increment inside a compact region of 14, 21 or 28 pixels is detected, and a trigger pulse is generated. In the most basic version of the trigger system, this pulse is just distributed throughout the camera in such a way that all the clusters are read at the same time, independently from their position in the camera, by means of a complex distribution system. Thus, the readout saves a complete camera image whenever the number of photoelectrons set as threshold is exceeded in a trigger region. However, this way of operating has two important drawbacks. First, the shower usually covers only a little part of the camera, so many pixels without relevant information are stored. When there are many telescopes as will be the case of CTA, the amount of useless stored information can be very high. On the other hand, with every trigger only some nanoseconds of information around the trigger time are stored. In the case of large showers, the duration of the shower can be quite larger, loosing information due to the temporal cut. With the aim to solve both limitations, a trigger and readout scheme based on two thresholds has been proposed. The high threshold decides if there is a relevant event in the camera, and in the positive case, only the trigger regions exceeding the low threshold are read, during a longer time. In this way, the information from empty pixels is not stored and the fixed images of the showers become to little \`videos" containing the temporal development of the shower. This new scheme is named COLIBRI (Concept for an Optimized Local Image Building and Readout Infrastructure), and it has been described in depth in chapter 5. An important problem affecting sumtrigger schemes like the one presented in this thesis is that in order to add the signals from each pixel properly, they must arrive at the same time. The photomultipliers used in each pixel introduce different delays which must be compensated to perform the additions properly. The effect of these delays has been analyzed, and a delay compensation system has been developed. The next trigger level consists of looking for simultaneous (or very near in time) triggers in neighbour telescopes. These function, together with others relating to interfacing different systems, have been developed in a system named Trigger Interface Board (TIB). This system is comprised of one module which will be placed inside the LSTs and MSTs cameras, and which will be connected to the neighbour telescopes through optical fibers. When a telescope receives a local trigger, it is resent to all the connected neighbours and vice-versa, so every telescope knows if its neighbours have been triggered. Once compensated the delay differences due to propagation in the optical fibers and in the air depending on the pointing direction, the TIB looks for coincidences, and in the case that the trigger condition is accomplished, the camera is read a fixed time after the local trigger arrived. Despite all the trigger system is the result of the cooperation of several groups, specially IFAE, Ciemat, ICC-UB and UCM in Spain, with some help from french and japanese groups, the Level 1 and the Trigger Interface Board constitute the core of this thesis, as they have been the two systems designed by the author of the thesis. For this reason, a large amount of technical information about these systems has been included. There are important future development lines regarding both the camera trigger (implementation in ASICS) and the stereo trigger (topological trigger), which will produce interesting improvements for the current designs during the following years, being useful for all the scientific community participating in CTA.