Stability and Transient Performance Assessment in a COTS-Module-Based Distributed DC/DC System

This paper introduces a method to analyze and predict stability and transient performance of a distributed system where COTS (Commercial-off-the-shelf) modules share an input filter. The presented procedure is based on the measured data from the input and output terminals of the power modules. The required information for the analysis is obtained by performing frequency response measurements for each converter. This attained data is utilized to compute special transfer functions, which partly determine the source and load interactions within the converters. The system level dynamic description is constructed based on the measured and computed transfer functions introducing cross-coupling mechanisms within the system. System stability can be studied based on the well-known impedance- related minor-loop gain at an arbitrary interface within the system.

Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC): A New Concept to Improve the Dynamic Response of DC/DC Converters with Additional Energy Path

El desarrollo da las nuevas tecnologías permite a los ingenieros llevar al límite el funcionamiento de los circuitos integrados (Integrated Circuits, IC). Las nuevas generaciones de procesadores, DSPs o FPGAs son capaces de procesar la información a una alta velocidad, con un alto consumo de energía, o esperar en modo de baja potencia con el mínimo consumo posible. Esta gran variación en el consumo de potencia y el corto tiempo necesario para cambiar de un nivel al otro, afecta a las especificaciones del Módulo de Regulador de Tensión (Voltage Regulated Module, VRM) que alimenta al IC. Además, las características adicionales obligatorias, tales como adaptación del nivel de tensión (Adaptive Voltage Positioning, AVP) y escalado dinámico de la tensión (Dynamic Voltage Scaling, DVS), imponen requisitos opuestas en el diseño de la etapa de potencia del VRM. Para poder soportar las altas variaciones de los escalones de carga, el condensador de filtro de salida del VRM se ha de sobredimensionar, penalizando la densidad de energía y el rendimiento durante la operación de DVS. Por tanto, las actuales tendencias de investigación se centran en mejorar la respuesta dinámica del VRM, mientras se reduce el tamaño del condensador de salida. La reducción del condensador de salida lleva a menor coste y una prolongación de la vida del sistema ya que se podría evitar el uso de condensadores voluminosos, normalmente implementados con condensadores OSCON. Una ventaja adicional es que reduciendo el condensador de salida, el DVS se puede realizar más rápido y con menor estrés de la etapa de potencia, ya que la cantidad de carga necesaria para cambiar la tensión de salida es menor. El comportamiento dinámico del sistema con un control lineal (Control Modo Tensión, VMC, o Control Corriente de Pico, Peak Current Mode Control, PCMC,…) está limitado por la frecuencia de conmutación del convertidor y por el tamaño del filtro de salida. La reducción del condensador de salida se puede lograr incrementando la frecuencia de conmutación, así como incrementando el ancho de banda del sistema, y/o aplicando controles avanzados no-lineales. Usando esos controles, las variables del estado se saturan para conseguir el nuevo régimen permanente en un tiempo mínimo, así como el filtro de salida, más específicamente la pendiente de la corriente de la bobina, define la respuesta de la tensión de salida. Por tanto, reduciendo la inductancia de la bobina de salida, la corriente de bobina llega más rápido al nuevo régimen permanente, por lo que una menor cantidad de carga es tomada del condensador de salida durante el tránsito. El inconveniente de esa propuesta es que el rendimiento del sistema es penalizado debido al incremento de pérdidas de conmutación y las corrientes RMS. Para conseguir tanto la reducción del condensador de salida como el alto rendimiento del sistema, mientras se satisfacen las estrictas especificaciones dinámicas, un convertidor multifase es adoptado como estándar para aplicaciones VRM. Para asegurar el reparto de las corrientes entre fases, el convertidor multifase se suele implementar con control de modo de corriente. Para superar la limitación impuesta por el filtro de salida, la segunda posibilidad para reducir el condensador de salida es aplicar alguna modificación topológica (Topologic modifications) de la etapa básica de potencia para incrementar la pendiente de la corriente de bobina y así reducir la duración de tránsito. Como el transitorio se ha reducido, una menor cantidad de carga es tomada del condensador de salida bajo el mismo escalón de la corriente de salida, con lo cual, el condensador de salida se puede reducir para lograr la misma desviación de la tensión de salida. La tercera posibilidad para reducir el condensador de salida del convertidor es introducir un camino auxiliar de energía (additional energy path, AEP) para compensar el desequilibrio de la carga del condensador de salida reduciendo consecuentemente la duración del transitorio y la desviación de la tensión de salida. De esta manera, durante el régimen permanente, el sistema tiene un alto rendimiento debido a que el convertidor principal con bajo ancho de banda es diseñado para trabajar con una frecuencia de conmutación moderada para conseguir requisitos estáticos. Por otro lado, el comportamiento dinámico durante los transitorios es determinado por el AEP con un alto ancho de banda. El AEP puede ser implementado como un camino resistivo, como regulador lineal (Linear regulator, LR) o como un convertidor conmutado. Las dos primeras implementaciones proveen un mayor ancho de banda, acosta del incremento de pérdidas durante el transitorio. Por otro lado, la implementación del convertidor computado presenta menor ancho de banda, limitado por la frecuencia de conmutación, aunque produce menores pérdidas comparado con las dos anteriores implementaciones. Dependiendo de la aplicación, la implementación y la estrategia de control del sistema, hay una variedad de soluciones propuestas en el Estado del Arte (State-of-the-Art, SoA), teniendo diferentes propiedades donde una solución ofrece más ventajas que las otras, pero también unas desventajas. En general, un sistema con AEP ideal debería tener las siguientes propiedades: 1. El impacto del AEP a las pérdidas del sistema debería ser mínimo. A lo largo de la operación, el AEP genera pérdidas adicionales, con lo cual, en el caso ideal, el AEP debería trabajar por un pequeño intervalo de tiempo, solo durante los tránsitos; la otra opción es tener el AEP constantemente activo pero, por la compensación del rizado de la corriente de bobina, se generan pérdidas innecesarias. 2. El AEP debería ser activado inmediatamente para minimizar la desviación de la tensión de salida. Para conseguir una activación casi instantánea, el sistema puede ser informado por la carga antes del escalón o el sistema puede observar la corriente del condensador de salida, debido a que es la primera variable del estado que actúa a la perturbación de la corriente de salida. De esa manera, el AEP es activado con casi cero error de la tensión de salida, logrando una menor desviación de la tensión de salida. 3. El AEP debería ser desactivado una vez que el nuevo régimen permanente es detectado para evitar los transitorios adicionales de establecimiento. La mayoría de las soluciones de SoA estiman la duración del transitorio, que puede provocar un transitorio adicional si la estimación no se ha hecho correctamente (por ejemplo, si la corriente de bobina del convertidor principal tiene un nivel superior o inferior al necesitado, el regulador lento del convertidor principal tiene que compensar esa diferencia una vez que el AEP es desactivado). Otras soluciones de SoA observan las variables de estado, asegurando que el sistema llegue al nuevo régimen permanente, o pueden ser informadas por la carga. 4. Durante el transitorio, como mínimo un subsistema, o bien el convertidor principal o el AEP, debería operar en el lazo cerrado. Implementando un sistema en el lazo cerrado, preferiblemente el subsistema AEP por su ancho de banda elevado, se incrementa la robustez del sistema a los parásitos. Además, el AEP puede operar con cualquier tipo de corriente de carga. Las soluciones que funcionan en el lazo abierto suelen preformar el control de balance de carga con mínimo tiempo, así reducen la duración del transitorio y tienen un impacto menor a las pérdidas del sistema. Por otro lado, esas soluciones demuestran una alta sensibilidad a las tolerancias y parásitos de los componentes. 5. El AEP debería inyectar la corriente a la salida en una manera controlada, así se reduce el riesgo de unas corrientes elevadas y potencialmente peligrosas y se incrementa la robustez del sistema bajo las perturbaciones de la tensión de entrada. Ese problema suele ser relacionado con los sistemas donde el AEP es implementado como un convertidor auxiliar. El convertidor auxiliar es diseñado para una potencia baja, con lo cual, los dispositivos elegidos son de baja corriente/potencia. Si la corriente no es controlada, bajo un pico de tensión de entrada provocada por otro parte del sistema (por ejemplo, otro convertidor conectado al mismo bus), se puede llegar a un pico en la corriente auxiliar que puede causar la perturbación de tensión de salida e incluso el fallo de los dispositivos del convertidor auxiliar. Sin embargo, cuando la corriente es controlada, usando control del pico de corriente o control con histéresis, la corriente auxiliar tiene el control con prealimentación (feed-forward) de tensión de entrada y la corriente es definida y limitada. Por otro lado, si la solución utiliza el control de balance de carga, el sistema puede actuar de forma deficiente si la tensión de entrada tiene un valor diferente del nominal, provocando que el AEP inyecta/toma más/menos carga que necesitada. 6. Escalabilidad del sistema a convertidores multifase. Como ya ha sido comentado anteriormente, para las aplicaciones VRM por la corriente de carga elevada, el convertidor principal suele ser implementado como multifase para distribuir las perdidas entre las fases y bajar el estrés térmico de los dispositivos. Para asegurar el reparto de las corrientes, normalmente un control de modo corriente es usado. Las soluciones de SoA que usan VMC son limitadas a la implementación con solo una fase. Esta tesis propone un nuevo método de control del flujo de energía por el AEP y el convertidor principal. El concepto propuesto se basa en la inyección controlada de la corriente auxiliar al nodo de salida donde la amplitud de la corriente es n-1 veces mayor que la corriente del condensador de salida con las direcciones apropiadas. De esta manera, el AEP genera un condensador virtual cuya capacidad es n veces mayor que el condensador físico y reduce la impedancia de salida. Como el concepto propuesto reduce la impedancia de salida usando el AEP, el concepto es llamado Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC) concept. El concepto se desarrolla para un convertidor tipo reductor síncrono multifase con control modo de corriente CMC (incluyendo e implementación con una fase) y puede operar con la tensión de salida constante o con AVP. Además, el concepto es extendido a un convertidor de una fase con control modo de tensión VMC. Durante la operación, el control de tensión de salida de convertidor principal y control de corriente del subsistema OICC están siempre cerrados, incrementando la robustez a las tolerancias de componentes y a los parásitos del cirquito y permitiendo que el sistema se pueda enfrentar a cualquier tipo de la corriente de carga. Según el método de control propuesto, el sistema se puede encontrar en dos estados: durante el régimen permanente, el sistema se encuentra en el estado Idle y el subsistema OICC esta desactivado. Por otro lado, durante el transitorio, el sistema se encuentra en estado Activo y el subsistema OICC está activado para reducir la impedancia de salida. El cambio entre los estados se hace de forma autónoma: el sistema entra en el estado Activo observando la corriente de condensador de salida y vuelve al estado Idle cunado el nuevo régimen permanente es detectado, observando las variables del estado. La validación del concepto OICC es hecha aplicándolo a un convertidor tipo reductor síncrono con dos fases y de 30W cuyo condensador de salida tiene capacidad de 140μF, mientras el factor de multiplicación n es 15, generando en el estado Activo el condensador virtual de 2.1mF. El subsistema OICC es implementado como un convertidor tipo reductor síncrono con PCMC. Comparando el funcionamiento del convertidor con y sin el OICC, los resultados demuestran que se ha logrado una reducción de la desviación de tensión de salida con factor 12, tanto con funcionamiento básico como con funcionamiento AVP. Además, los resultados son comparados con un prototipo de referencia que tiene la misma etapa de potencia y un condensador de salida físico de 2.1mF. Los resultados demuestran que los dos sistemas tienen el mismo comportamiento dinámico. Más aun, se ha cuantificado el impacto en las pérdidas del sistema operando bajo una corriente de carga pulsante y bajo DVS. Se demuestra que el sistema con OICC mejora el rendimiento del sistema, considerando las pérdidas cuando el sistema trabaja con la carga pulsante y con DVS. Por lo último, el condensador de salida de sistema con OICC es mucho más pequeño que el condensador de salida del convertidor de referencia, con lo cual, por usar el concepto OICC, la densidad de energía se incrementa. En resumen, las contribuciones principales de la tesis son: • El concepto propuesto de Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC), • El control a nivel de sistema basado en el método usado para cambiar los estados de operación, • La implementación del subsistema OICC en lazo cerrado conjunto con la implementación del convertidor principal, • La cuantificación de las perdidas dinámicas bajo la carga pulsante y bajo la operación DVS, y • La robustez del sistema bajo la variación del condensador de salida y bajo los escalones de carga consecutiva. ABSTRACT Development of new technologies allows engineers to push the performance of the integrated circuits to its limits. New generations of processors, DSPs or FPGAs are able to process information with high speed and high consumption or to wait in low power mode with minimum possible consumption. This huge variation in power consumption and the short time needed to change from one level to another, affect the specifications of the Voltage Regulated Module (VRM) that supplies the IC. Furthermore, additional mandatory features, such as Adaptive Voltage Positioning (AVP) and Dynamic Voltage Scaling (DVS), impose opposite trends on the design of the VRM power stage. In order to cope with high load-step amplitudes, the output capacitor of the VRM power stage output filter is drastically oversized, penalizing power density and the efficiency during the DVS operation. Therefore, the ongoing research trend is directed to improve the dynamic response of the VRM while reducing the size of the output capacitor. The output capacitor reduction leads to a smaller cost and longer life-time of the system since the big bulk capacitors, usually implemented with OSCON capacitors, may not be needed to achieve the desired dynamic behavior. An additional advantage is that, by reducing the output capacitance, dynamic voltage scaling (DVS) can be performed faster and with smaller stress on the power stage, since the needed amount of charge to change the output voltage is smaller. The dynamic behavior of the system with a linear control (Voltage mode control, VMC, Peak Current Mode Control, PCMC,…) is limited by the converter switching frequency and filter size. The reduction of the output capacitor can be achieved by increasing the switching frequency of the converter, thus increasing the bandwidth of the system, and/or by applying advanced non-linear controls. Applying nonlinear control, the system variables get saturated in order to reach the new steady-state in a minimum time, thus the output filter, more specifically the output inductor current slew-rate, determines the output voltage response. Therefore, by reducing the output inductor value, the inductor current reaches faster the new steady state, so a smaller amount of charge is taken from the output capacitor during the transient. The drawback of this approach is that the system efficiency is penalized due to increased switching losses and RMS currents. In order to achieve both the output capacitor reduction and high system efficiency, while satisfying strict dynamic specifications, a Multiphase converter system is adopted as a standard for VRM applications. In order to ensure the current sharing among the phases, the multiphase converter is usually implemented with current mode control. In order to overcome the limitation imposed by the output filter, the second possibility to reduce the output capacitor is to apply Topologic modifications of the basic power stage topology in order to increase the slew-rate of the inductor current and, therefore, reduce the transient duration. Since the transient is reduced, smaller amount of charge is taken from the output capacitor under the same load current, thus, the output capacitor can be reduced to achieve the same output voltage deviation. The third possibility to reduce the output capacitor of the converter is to introduce an additional energy path (AEP) to compensate the charge unbalance of the output capacitor, consequently reducing the transient time and output voltage deviation. Doing so, during the steady-state operation the system has high efficiency because the main low-bandwidth converter is designed to operate at moderate switching frequency, to meet the static requirements, whereas the dynamic behavior during the transients is determined by the high-bandwidth auxiliary energy path. The auxiliary energy path can be implemented as a resistive path, as a Linear regulator, LR, or as a switching converter. The first two implementations provide higher bandwidth, at the expense of increasing losses during the transient. On the other hand, the switching converter implementation presents lower bandwidth, limited by the auxiliary converter switching frequency, though it produces smaller losses compared to the two previous implementations. Depending on the application, the implementation and the control strategy of the system, there is a variety of proposed solutions in the State-of-the-Art (SoA), having different features where one solution offers some advantages over the others, but also some disadvantages. In general, an ideal additional energy path system should have the following features: 1. The impact on the system losses should be minimal. During its operation, the AEP generates additional losses, thus ideally, the AEP should operate for a short period of time, only when the transient is occurring; the other option is to have the AEP constantly on, but due to the inductor current ripple compensation at the output, unnecessary losses are generated. 2. The AEP should be activated nearly instantaneously to prevent bigger output voltage deviation. To achieve near instantaneous activation, the converter system can be informed by the load prior to the load-step or the system can observe the output capacitor current, which is the first system state variable that reacts on the load current perturbation. In this manner, the AEP is turned on with near zero output voltage error, providing smaller output voltage deviation. 3. The AEP should be deactivated once the new steady state is reached to avoid additional settling transients. Most of the SoA solutions estimate duration of the transient which may cause additional transient if the estimation is not performed correctly (e.g. if the main converter inductor current has higher or lower value than needed, the slow regulator of the main converter needs to compensate the difference after the AEP is deactivated). Other SoA solutions are observing state variables, ensuring that the system reaches the new steady state or they are informed by the load. 4. During the transient, at least one subsystem, either the main converter or the AEP, should be in closed-loop. Implementing a closed loop system, preferably the AEP subsystem, due its higher bandwidth, increases the robustness under system tolerances and circuit parasitic. In addition, the AEP can operate with any type of load. The solutions that operate in open loop usually perform minimum time charge balance control, thus reducing the transient length and minimizing the impact on the losses, however they are very sensitive to tolerances and parasitics. 5. The AEP should inject current at the output in a controlled manner, thus reducing the risk of high and potentially damaging currents and increasing robustness on the input voltage deviation. This issue is mainly related to the systems where AEP is implemented as auxiliary converter. The auxiliary converter is designed for small power and, as such, the MOSFETs are rated for small power/currents. If the current is not controlled, due to the some unpredicted spike in input voltage caused by some other part of the system (e.g. different converter), it may lead to a current spike in auxiliary current which will cause the perturbation of the output voltage and even failure of the switching components of auxiliary converter. In the case when the current is controlled, using peak CMC or Hysteretic Window CMC, the auxiliary converter has inherent feed-forwarding of the input voltage in current control and the current is defined and limited. Furthermore, if the solution employs charge balance control, the system may perform poorly if the input voltage has different value than the nominal, causing that AEP injects/extracts more/less charge than needed. 6. Scalability of the system to multiphase converters. As commented previously, in VRM applications, due to the high load currents, the main converters are implemented as multiphase to redistribute losses among the modules, lowering temperature stress of the components. To ensure the current sharing, usually a Current Mode Control (CMC) is employed. The SoA solutions that are implemented with VMC are limited to a single stage implementation. This thesis proposes a novel control method of the energy flow through the AEP and the main converter system. The proposed concept relays on a controlled injection of the auxiliary current at the output node where the instantaneous current value is n-1 times bigger than the output capacitor current with appropriate directions. Doing so, the AEP creates an equivalent n times bigger virtual capacitor at the output, thus reducing the output impedance. Due to the fact that the proposed concept reduces the output impedance using the AEP, it has been named the Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC) concept. The concept is developed for a multiphase CMC synchronous buck converter (including a single phase implementation), operating with a constant output voltage and with AVP feature. Further, it is extended to a single phase VMC synchronous buck converter. During the operation, the main converter voltage loop and the OICC subsystem capacitor current loop is constantly closed, increasing the robustness under system tolerances and circuit parasitic and allowing the system to operate with any load-current shape or pattern. According to the proposed control method, the system operates in two states: during the steady-state the system is in the Idle state and the OICC subsystem is deactivated, while during the load-step transient the system is in the Active state and the OICC subsystem is activated in order to reduce the output impedance. The state changes are performed autonomously: the system enters in the Active state by observing the output capacitor current and it returns back to the Idle state when the steady-state operation is detected by observing the state variables. The validation of the OICC concept has been done by applying it to a 30W two phase synchronous buck converter with 140μF output capacitor and with the multiplication factor n equal to 15, generating during the Active state equivalent output capacitor of 2.1mF. The OICC subsystem is implemented as single phase PCMC synchronous buck converter. Comparing the converter operation with and without the OICC the results demonstrate that the 12 times reduction of the output voltage deviation is achieved, for both basic operation and for the AVP operation. Furthermore, the results have been compared to a reference prototype which has the same power stage and a fiscal output capacitor of 2.1mF. The results show that the two systems have the same dynamic behavior. Moreover, an impact on the system losses under the pulsating load and DVS operation has been quantified and it has been demonstrated that the OICC system has improved the system efficiency, considering the losses when the system operates with the pulsating load and the DVS operation. Lastly, the output capacitor of the OICC system is much smaller than the reference design output capacitor, therefore, by applying the OICC concept the power density can be increased. In summary, the main contributions of the thesis are: • The proposed Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC) concept, • The system level control based on the used approach to change the states of operation, • The OICC subsystem closed-loop implementation, together with the main converter implementation, • The dynamic losses under the pulsating load and the DVS operation quantification, and • The system robustness on the capacitor impedance variation and consecutive load-steps.

High-efficiency Köhler photovoltaic concentrators with external light confinement

Metal grid lines are a vital element in multijunction solar cells in order to take out from the cell the generated photocurrent. Nevertheless all this implies certain shadowing factor and thus certain reflectivity on cells surface that lowers its light absorption. This reflectivity produces a loss in electrical efficiency and thus a loss in global energy production for CPV systems. We present here an optical design for recovering this portion of reflected light, and thus leading to a system efficiency increase. This new design is based on an external confinement cavity, an optical element able to redirect the light reflected by the cell towards its surface again. It has been possible thanks to the recent invention of the advanced Köhler concentrators by LPI, likely to integrate one of these cavities easily. We have proven the excellent performance of these cavities integrated in this kind of CPV modules offering outstanding results: 33.2% module electrical efficiency @Tcell=25ºC and relative efficiency and Isc gains of over 6%.

Design methodology in multiphase buck converter based on minimum time control for high efficiency RF amplifiers

This paper proposes an interleaved multiphase buck converter with minimum time control strategy for envelope amplifiers in high efficiency RF power amplifiers. The solution of the envelope amplifier is to combine the proposed converter with a linear regulator in series. High system efficiency can be obtained through modulating the supply voltage of the envelope amplifier with the fast output voltage variation of the converter working with several particular duty cycles that achieve total ripple cancellation. The transient model for minimum time control is explained, and the calculation of transient times that are pre-calculated and inserted into a look-up table is presented. The filter design trade-off that limits capability of envelope modulation is also discussed. The experimental results verify the fast voltage transient obtained with a 4-phase buck prototype.

Field experiment of 800× off-axis XR-Köhler concentrator module on a carousel tracker

This paper presents the design and preliminary experimental results of a concentrator-type photovoltaic module based on a free-form off-axis 800×XR-Köhler concentrator. The off-axis XR-Köhler concentrator is one of the advanced concentrators that perform high concentration with a large acceptance angle and excellent irradiance uniformity on a solar cell. As a result of on-sun characterization of the unglazed single-cell unit test rig, the temperature-corrected DC module efficiency was 32.2% at 25 °C without an anti-reflective (AR) coating on the secondary optics, and the acceptance angle was more than ±1.0°. In addition, the non-corrected DC efficiency of an individual cell in a glazed 8-cell unit module mounted on a carousel tracking system was measured. The individual efficiency deviated in the range of 24.3-27.4%, owing to the mirror shape and alignment errors. The resultant series-connected efficiency was approximately 25% at direct normal irradiation (DNI) of 770 W/m2.

Night time performance of a storage integrated solar thermophotovoltaic (SISTPV) system

Energy storage at low maintenance cost is one of the key challenges for generating electricity from the solar energy. This paper presents the theoretical analysis (verified by CFD) of the night time performance of a recently proposed conceptual system that integrates thermal storage (via phase change materials) and thermophotovoltaics for power generation. These storage integrated solar thermophotovoltaic (SISTPV) systems are attractive owing to their simple design (no moving parts) and modularity compared to conventional Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) technologies. Importantly, the ability of high temperature operation of these systems allows the use of silicon (melting point of 1680 K) as the phase change material (PCM). Silicon's very high latent heat of fusion of 1800 kJ/kg and low cost ($1.70/kg), makes it an ideal heat storage medium enabling for an extremely high storage energy density and low weight modular systems. In this paper, the night time operation of the SISTPV system optimised for steady state is analysed. The results indicate that for any given PCM length, a combination of small taper ratio and large inlet hole-to-absorber area ratio are essential to increase the operation time and the average power produced during the night time. Additionally, the overall results show that there is a trade-off between running time and the average power produced during the night time. Average night time power densities as high as 30 W/cm(2) are possible if the system is designed with a small PCM length (10 cm) to operate just a few hours after sun-set, but running times longer than 72 h (3 days) are possible for larger lengths (50 cm) at the expense of a lower average power density of about 14 W/cm(2). In both cases the steady state system efficiency has been predicted to be about 30%. This makes SISTPV systems to be a versatile solution that can be adapted for operation in a broad range of locations with different climate conditions, even being used off-grid and in space applications.

Towards 35% Efficient Concentrator Modules Based On LPI Köhler Concentrators With External Confinement Cavities

Multijunction solar cells present a certain reflectivity on its surface that lowers its light absorption. This reflectivity produces a loss in electrical efficiency and thus a loss in global energy production for CPV systems. We present here an optical design for recovering this portion of reflected light, and thus leading to a system efficiency increase. This new design is based on an external confinement cavity, an optical element able to redirect the light reflected by the cell towards its surface again. We have proven the excellent performance of these cavities integrated in CPV modules offering outstanding results: 33.2% module electrical efficiency @Tcell  =  25 °C and relative efficiency and Isc gains of over 6%

Optimal and Long-Term Dynamic Transport Policy Design: Seeking Maximum Social Welfare through a Pricing Scheme.

This article presents an alternative approach to the decision-making process in transport strategy design. The study explores the possibility of integrating forecasting, assessment and optimization procedures in support of a decision-making process designed to reach the best achievable scenario through mobility policies. Long-term evaluation, as required by a dynamic system such as a city, is provided by a strategic Land-Use and Transport Interaction (LUTI) model. The social welfare achieved by implementing mobility LUTI model policies is measured through a cost-benefit analysis and maximized through an optimization process throughout the evaluation period. The method is tested by optimizing a pricing policy scheme in Madrid on a cordon toll in a context requiring system efficiency, social equity and environmental quality. The optimized scheme yields an appreciable increase in social surplus through a relatively low rate compared to other similar pricing toll schemes. The results highlight the different considerations regarding mobility impacts on the case study area, as well as the major contributors to social welfare surplus. This leads the authors to reconsider the cost-analysis approach, as defined in the study, as the best option for formulating sustainability measures.

NGCPV: a new generation of concentrator photovoltaic cells, modules and systems

Starting on June 2011, NGCPV is the first project funded jointly between the European Commission (EC) and the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan to research on new generation concentration photovoltaics (CPV). The Project, through a collaborative research between seven European and nine Japanese leading research centers in the field of CPV, aims at lowering the cost of the CPVproduced photovoltaic kWh down to 5 ?cents. The main objective of the project is to improve the present concentrator cell, module and system efficiency, as well as developing advanced characterization tools for CPV components and systems. As particular targets, the project aims at achieving a cell efficiency of at least 45% and a CPV module with an efficiency greater than 35%. This paper describes the R&D activities that are being carried out within the NGCPV project and summarizes some of the most relevant results that have already been attained, for instance: the manufacturing of a 44.4% world record efficiency triple junction solar cell (by Sharp Corp.) and the installation of a 50 kWp experimental CPV plant in Spain, which will be used to obtain accurate forecasts of the energy produced at system level.

Global optimization of solar thermophotovoltaic systems

n this paper, we present a theoretical model based on the detailed balance theory of solar thermophotovoltaic systems comprising multijunction photovoltaic cells, a sunlight concentrator and spectrally selective surfaces. The full system has been defined by means of 2n + 8 variables (being n the number of sub-cells of the multijunction cell). These variables are as follows: the sunlight concentration factor, the absorber cut-off energy, the emitter-to-absorber area ratio, the emitter cut-off energy, the band-gap energy(ies) and voltage(s) of the sub-cells, the reflectivity of the cells' back-side reflector, the emitter-to-cell and cell-to-cell view factors and the emitter-to-cell area ratio. We have used this model for carrying out a multi-variable system optimization by means of a multidimensional direct-search algorithm. This analysis allows to find the set of system variables whose combined effects results in the maximum overall system efficiency. From this analysis, we have seen that multijunction cells are excellent candidates to enhance the system efficiency and the electrical power density. Particularly, multijunction cells report great benefits for systems with a notable presence of optical losses, which are unavoidable in practical systems. Also, we have seen that the use of spectrally selective absorbers, rather than black-body absorbers, allows to achieve higher system efficiencies for both lower concentration and lower emitter-to-absorber area ratio. Finally, we have seen that sun-to-electricity conversion efficiencies above 30% and electrical power densities above 50 W/cm2 are achievable for this kind of systems.

Improvement of the Dynamic Performance of a Multiphase Current Controlled Buck Converter using an Auxiliary Synchronous Buck Converter as an Additional Energy Path

This work is related to the output impedance improvement of a Multiphase Buck converter with Peak Current Mode Control (PCMC) by means of introducing an additional power path that virtually increases the output capacitance during transients. Various solutions that can be employed to improve the dynamic behavior of the converter system exist, but nearly all solutions are developed for a Single Phase Buck converter with Voltage Mode Control (VMC), while in the VRM applications, due to the high currents, the system is usually implemented as a Multiphase Buck Converter with Current Mode Control. The additional energy path, as presented here, is introduced with the Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC) based on the Controlled Current Source (CCS). The OICC is used to inject or extract a current n-1 times larger than the output capacitor current, thus virtually increasing n times the value of the output capacitance during the transients. Furthermore, this work extends the OICC concept to a Multiphase Buck Converter system while comparing proposed solution with the system that has n times bigger output capacitor. In addition, the OICC is implemented as a Synchronous Buck Converter with PCMC, thus reducing its influence on the system efficiency.

Multiphase Current Controlled Buck Converter with energy recycling Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC)

This work is related to the output impedance improvement of a Multiphase Buck converter with Peak Current Mode Control (PCMC) by means of introducing an additional power path that virtually increases the output capacitance during transients. Various solutions that can be employed to improve the dynamic behavior of the converter system exist, but nearly all solutions are developed for a Single Phase Buck converter with Voltage Mode Control (VMC), while in the VRM applications, due to the high currents, the system is usually implemented as a Multiphase Buck Converter with Current Mode Control. The Output Impedance Correction Circuit (OICC) is used to inject or extract a current n-1 times larger than the output capacitor current, thus virtually increasing n times the value of the output capacitance during the transients. Furthermore, this work extends the OICC concept to a Multiphase Buck Converter system while comparing proposed solution with the system that has n times bigger output capacitor. In addition, the OICC is implemented as a Synchronous Buck Converter with PCMC, thus reducing its influence on the system efficiency

Optimal and Long-Term Dynamic Transport Policy Design: Seeking Maximum Social Welfare through a Pricing Scheme

This article presents an alternative approach to the decision-making process in transport strategy design. The study explores the possibility of integrating forecasting, assessment and optimization procedures in support of a decision-making process designed to reach the best achievable scenario through mobility policies. Long-term evaluation, as required by a dynamic system such as a city, is provided by a strategic Land-Use and Transport Interaction (LUTI) model. The social welfare achieved by implementing mobility LUTI model policies is measured through a cost-benefit analysis and maximized through an optimization process throughout the evaluation period. The method is tested by optimizing a pricing policy scheme in Madrid on a cordon toll in a context requiring system efficiency, social equity and environmental quality. The optimized scheme yields an appreciable increase in social surplus through a relatively low rate compared to other similar pricing toll schemes. The results highlight the different considerations regarding mobility impacts on the case study area, as well as the major contributors to social welfare surplus. This leads the authors to reconsider the cost-analysis approach, as defined in the study, as the best option for formulating sustainability measures.

Wide bandwidth envelope trackers with reduced switching frequency for RF power amplifier

El requerimiento de proveer alta frecuencia de datos en los modernos sistema de comunicación inalámbricos resulta en complejas señales moduladas de radio-frequencia (RF) con un gran ancho de banda y alto ratio pico-promedio (PAPR). Para garantizar la linealidad del comportamiento, los amplificadores lineales de potencia comunes funcionan típicamente entre 4 y 10 dB de back-o_ desde la máxima potencia de salida, ocasionando una baja eficiencia del sistema. La eliminación y restauración de la evolvente (EER) y el seguimiento de la evolvente (ET) son dos prometedoras técnicas para resolver el problema de la eficiencia. Tanto en EER como en ET, es complicado diseñar un amplificador de potencia que sea eficiente para señales de RF de alto ancho de banda y alto PAPR. Una propuesta común para los amplificadores de potencia es incluir un convertidor de potencia de muy alta eficiencia operando a frecuencias más altas que el ancho de banda de la señal RF. En este caso, la potencia perdida del convertidor ocasionado por la alta frecuencia desaconseja su práctica cuando el ancho de banda es muy alto. La solución a este problema es el enfoque de esta disertación que presenta dos arquitecturas de amplificador evolvente: convertidor híbrido-serie con una técnica de evolvente lenta y un convertidor multinivel basado en un convertidor reductor multifase con control de tiempo mínimo. En la primera arquitectura, una topología híbrida está compuesta de una convertidor reductor conmutado y un regulador lineal en serie que trabajan juntos para ajustar la tensión de salida para seguir a la evolvente con precisión. Un algoritmo de generación de una evolvente lenta crea una forma de onda con una pendiente limitada que es menor que la pendiente máxima de la evolvente original. La salida del convertidor reductor sigue esa forma de onda en vez de la evolvente original usando una menor frecuencia de conmutación, porque la forma de onda no sólo tiene una pendiente reducida sino también un menor ancho de banda. De esta forma, el regulador lineal se usa para filtrar la forma de onda tiene una pérdida de potencia adicional. Dependiendo de cuánto se puede reducir la pendiente de la evolvente para producir la forma de onda, existe un trade-off entre la pérdida de potencia del convertidor reductor relacionada con la frecuencia de conmutación y el regulador lineal. El punto óptimo referido a la menor pérdida de potencia total del amplificador de evolvente es capaz de identificarse con la ayuda de modelo preciso de pérdidas que es una combinación de modelos comportamentales y analíticos de pérdidas. Además, se analiza el efecto en la respuesta del filtro de salida del convertidor reductor. Un filtro de dampeo paralelo extra es necesario para eliminar la oscilación resonante del filtro de salida porque el convertidor reductor opera en lazo abierto. La segunda arquitectura es un amplificador de evolvente de seguimiento de tensión multinivel. Al contrario que los convertidores que usan multi-fuentes, un convertidor reductor multifase se emplea para generar la tensión multinivel. En régimen permanente, el convertidor reductor opera en puntos del ciclo de trabajo con cancelación completa del rizado. El número de niveles de tensión es igual al número de fases de acuerdo a las características del entrelazamiento del convertidor reductor. En la transición, un control de tiempo mínimo (MTC) para convertidores multifase es novedosamente propuesto y desarrollado para cambiar la tensión de salida del convertidor reductor entre diferentes niveles. A diferencia de controles convencionales de tiempo mínimo para convertidores multifase con inductancia equivalente, el propuesto MTC considera el rizado de corriente por cada fase basado en un desfase fijo que resulta en diferentes esquemas de control entre las fases. La ventaja de este control es que todas las corrientes vuelven a su fase en régimen permanente después de la transición para que la siguiente transición pueda empezar muy pronto, lo que es muy favorable para la aplicación de seguimiento de tensión multinivel. Además, el control es independiente de la carga y no es afectado por corrientes de fase desbalanceadas. Al igual que en la primera arquitectura, hay una etapa lineal con la misma función, conectada en serie con el convertidor reductor multifase. Dado que tanto el régimen permanente como el estado de transición del convertidor no están fuertemente relacionados con la frecuencia de conmutación, la frecuencia de conmutación puede ser reducida para el alto ancho de banda de la evolvente, la cual es la principal consideración de esta arquitectura. La optimización de la segunda arquitectura para más alto anchos de banda de la evolvente es presentada incluyendo el diseño del filtro de salida, la frecuencia de conmutación y el número de fases. El área de diseño del filtro está restringido por la transición rápida y el mínimo pulso del hardware. La rápida transición necesita un filtro pequeño pero la limitación del pulso mínimo del hardware lleva el diseño en el sentido contrario. La frecuencia de conmutación del convertidor afecta principalmente a la limitación del mínimo pulso y a las pérdidas de potencia. Con una menor frecuencia de conmutación, el ancho de pulso en la transición es más pequeño. El número de fases relativo a la aplicación específica puede ser optimizado en términos de la eficiencia global. Otro aspecto de la optimización es mejorar la estrategia de control. La transición permite seguir algunas partes de la evolvente que son más rápidas de lo que el hardware puede soportar al precio de complejidad. El nuevo método de sincronización de la transición incrementa la frecuencia de la transición, permitiendo que la tensión multinivel esté más cerca de la evolvente. Ambas estrategias permiten que el convertidor pueda seguir una evolvente con un ancho de banda más alto que la limitación de la etapa de potencia. El modelo de pérdidas del amplificador de evolvente se ha detallado y validado mediante medidas. El mecanismo de pérdidas de potencia del convertidor reductor tiene que incluir las transiciones en tiempo real, lo cual es diferente del clásico modelos de pérdidas de un convertidor reductor síncrono. Este modelo estima la eficiencia del sistema y juega un papel muy importante en el proceso de optimización. Finalmente, la segunda arquitectura del amplificador de evolvente se integra con el amplificador de clase F. La medida del sistema EER prueba el ahorro de energía con el amplificador de evolvente propuesto sin perjudicar la linealidad del sistema. ABSTRACT The requirement of delivering high data rates in modern wireless communication systems results in complex modulated RF signals with wide bandwidth and high peak-to-average ratio (PAPR). In order to guarantee the linearity performance, the conventional linear power amplifiers typically work at 4 to 10 dB back-off from the maximum output power, leading to low system efficiency. The envelope elimination and restoration (EER) and envelope tracking (ET) are two promising techniques to overcome the efficiency problem. In both EER and ET, it is challenging to design efficient envelope amplifier for wide bandwidth and high PAPR RF signals. An usual approach for envelope amplifier includes a high-efficiency switching power converter operating at a frequency higher than the RF signal's bandwidth. In this case, the power loss of converter caused by high switching operation becomes unbearable for system efficiency when signal bandwidth is very wide. The solution of this problem is the focus of this dissertation that presents two architectures of envelope amplifier: a hybrid series converter with slow-envelope technique and a multilevel converter based on a multiphase buck converter with the minimum time control. In the first architecture, a hybrid topology is composed of a switched buck converter and a linear regulator in series that work together to adjust the output voltage to track the envelope with accuracy. A slow envelope generation algorithm yields a waveform with limited slew rate that is lower than the maximum slew rate of the original envelope. The buck converter's output follows this waveform instead of the original envelope using lower switching frequency, because the waveform has not only reduced slew rate but also reduced bandwidth. In this way, the linear regulator used to filter the waveform has additional power loss. Depending on how much reduction of the slew rate of envelope in order to obtain that waveform, there is a trade-off between the power loss of buck converter related to the switching frequency and the power loss of linear regulator. The optimal point referring to the lowest total power loss of this envelope amplifier is identified with the help of a precise power loss model that is a combination of behavioral and analytic loss model. In addition, the output filter's effect on the response is analyzed. An extra parallel damping filter is needed to eliminate the resonant oscillation of output filter L and C, because the buck converter operates in open loop. The second architecture is a multilevel voltage tracking envelope amplifier. Unlike the converters using multi-sources, a multiphase buck converter is employed to generate the multilevel voltage. In the steady state, the buck converter operates at complete ripple cancellation points of duty cycle. The number of the voltage levels is equal to the number of phases according the characteristics of interleaved buck converter. In the transition, a minimum time control (MTC) for multiphase converter is originally proposed and developed for changing the output voltage of buck converter between different levels. As opposed to conventional minimum time control for multiphase converter with equivalent inductance, the proposed MTC considers the current ripple of each phase based on the fixed phase shift resulting in different control schemes among the phases. The advantage of this control is that all the phase current return to the steady state after the transition so that the next transition can be triggered very soon, which is very favorable for the application of multilevel voltage tracking. Besides, the control is independent on the load condition and not affected by the unbalance of phase current. Like the first architecture, there is also a linear stage with the same function, connected in series with the multiphase buck converter. Since both steady state and transition state of the converter are not strongly related to the switching frequency, it can be reduced for wide bandwidth envelope which is the main consideration of this architecture. The optimization of the second architecture for wider bandwidth envelope is presented including the output filter design, switching frequency and the number of phases. The filter design area is restrained by fast transition and the minimum pulse of hardware. The fast transition needs small filter but the minimum pulse of hardware limitation pushes the filter in opposite way. The converter switching frequency mainly affects the minimum pulse limitation and the power loss. With lower switching frequency, the pulse width in the transition is smaller. The number of phases related to specific application can be optimized in terms of overall efficiency. Another aspect of optimization is improving control strategy. Transition shift allows tracking some parts of envelope that are faster than the hardware can support at the price of complexity. The new transition synchronization method increases the frequency of transition, allowing the multilevel voltage to be closer to the envelope. Both control strategies push the converter to track wider bandwidth envelope than the limitation of power stage. The power loss model of envelope amplifier is detailed and validated by measurements. The power loss mechanism of buck converter has to include the transitions in real time operation, which is different from classical power loss model of synchronous buck converter. This model estimates the system efficiency and play a very important role in optimization process. Finally, the second envelope amplifier architecture is integrated with a Class F amplifier. EER system measurement proves the power saving with the proposed envelope amplifier without disrupting the linearity performance.

State of the Art and Future Trends in Grid Codes Applicable to Isolated Electrical Systems

Electrical power systems are changing their traditional structure, which was based on a little number of large generating power plants placed at great distances from loads by new models that tend to split the big production nodes in many smaller ones. The set of small groups which are located close to consumers and provide safe and quality energy is called distributed generation (DG). The proximity of the sources to the loads reduces losses associated with transportation and increases overall system efficiency. DG also favors the inclusion of renewable energy sources in isolated electrical systems or remote microgrids, because they can be installed where the natural resource is located. In both cases, as weak grids unable to get help from other nearby networks, it is essential to ensure appropriate behavior of DG sources to guarantee power system safety and stability. The grid codes sets out the technical requirements to be fulfilled for the sources connected in these electrical networks. In technical literature it is rather easy to find and compare grid codes for interconnected electrical systems. However, the existing literature is incomplete and sparse regarding isolated electrical systems and this happens due to the difficulties inherent in the pursuit of codes. Some countries have developed their own legislation only for their island territory (as Spain or France), others apply the same set of rules as in mainland, another group of island countries have elaborated a complete grid code for all generating sources and some others lack specific regulation. This paper aims to make a complete review of the state of the art in grid codes applicable to isolated systems, setting the comparison between them and defining the guidelines predictably followed by the upcoming regulations in these particular systems.