Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G-protein regulates cell wall defense and resistance to necrotrophic fungi

The Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G-protein controls defense responses to necrotrophic and vascular fungi. The agb1 mutant impaired in the Gβ subunit displays enhanced susceptibility to these pathogens. Gβ/AGB1 forms an obligate dimer with either one of the Arabidopsis Gγ subunits (γ1/AGG1 and γ2/AGG2). Accordingly, we now demonstrate that the agg1 agg2 double mutant is as susceptible as agb1 plants to the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina. To elucidate the molecular basis of heterotrimeric G-protein-mediated resistance, we performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of agb1-1 mutant and wild-type plants upon inoculation with P. cucumerina. This analysis, together with metabolomic studies, demonstrated that G-protein-mediated resistance was independent of defensive pathways required for resistance to necrotrophic fungi, such as the salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene, abscisic acid, and tryptophan-derived metabolites signaling, as these pathways were not impaired in agb1 and agg1 agg2 mutants. Notably, many mis-regulated genes in agb1 plants were related with cell wall functions, which was also the case in agg1 agg2 mutant. Biochemical analyses and Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopy of cell walls from G-protein mutants revealed that the xylose content was lower in agb1 and agg1 agg2 mutants than in wild-type plants, and that mutant walls had similar FTIR spectratypes, which differed from that of wild-type plants. The data presented here suggest a canonical functionality of the Gβ and Gγ1/γ2 subunits in the control of Arabidopsis immune responses and the regulation of cell wall composition.

Disruption of abscisic acid signaling constitutively activates Arabidopsis resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina.

Plant resistance to necrotrophic fungi is regulated by a complex set of signaling pathways that includes those mediated by the hormones salicylic acid (SA), ethylene (ET), jasmonic acid (JA), and abscisic acid (ABA). The role of ABA in plant resistance remains controversial, as positive and negative regulatory functions have been described depending on the plant-pathogen interaction analyzed. Here, we show that ABA signaling negatively regulates Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina. Arabidopsis plants impaired in ABA biosynthesis, such as the aba1-6 mutant, or in ABA signaling, like the quadruple pyr/pyl mutant (pyr1pyl1pyl2pyl4), were more resistant to P. cucumerina than wild-type plants. In contrast, the hab1-1abi1-2abi2-2 mutant impaired in three phosphatases that negatively regulate ABA signaling displayed an enhanced susceptibility phenotype to this fungus. Comparative transcriptomic analyses of aba1-6 and wild-type plants revealed that the ABA pathway negatively regulates defense genes, many of which are controlled by the SA, JA, or ET pathway. In line with these data, we found that aba1-6 resistance to P. cucumerina was partially compromised when the SA, JA, or ET pathway was disrupted in this mutant. Additionally, in the aba1-6 plants, some genes encoding cell wall-related proteins were misregulated. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and biochemical analyses of cell walls from aba1-6 and wild-type plants revealed significant differences in their Fourier transform infrared spectratypes and uronic acid and cellulose contents. All these data suggest that ABA signaling has a complex function in Arabidopsis basal resistance, negatively regulating SA/JA/ET-mediated resistance to necrotrophic fungi.

The role of the secondary cell wall in plant resistance to pathogens

Plant resistance to pathogens relies on a complex network of constitutive and inducible defensive barriers. The plant cell wall is one of the barriers that pathogens need to overcome to successfully colonize plant tissues. The traditional view of the plant cell wall as a passive barrier has evolved to a concept that considers the wall as a dynamic structure that regulates both constitutive and inducible defense mechanisms, and as a source of signaling molecules that trigger immune responses. The secondary cell walls of plants also represent a carbon-neutral feedstock (lignocellulosic biomass) for the production of biofuels and biomaterials. Therefore, engineering plants with improved secondary cell wall characteristics is an interesting strategy to ease the processing of lignocellulosic biomass in the biorefinery. However, modification of the integrity of the cell wall by impairment of proteins required for its biosynthesis or remodeling may impact the plants resistance to pathogens. This review summarizes our understanding of the role of the plant cell wall in pathogen resistance with a focus on the contribution of lignin to this biological process.

New insights into the regulation of NADPH oxidase dependent reactive oxygen species signaling during the plant immune response

Las NADPH oxidasas de plantas, denominadas “respiratory burst oxidase homologues” (RBOHs), producen especies reactivas del oxígeno (ROS) que median un amplio rango de funciones. En la célula vegetal, el ajuste preciso de la producción de ROS aporta la especificidad de señal para generar una respuesta apropiada ante las amenazas ambientales. RbohD y RbohF, dos de los diez genes Rboh de Arabidopsis, son pleiotrópicos y median diversos procesos fisiológicos en respuesta a patógenos. El control espacio-temporal de la expresión de los genes RbohD y RbohF podría ser un aspecto crítico para determinar la multiplicidad de funciones de estas oxidasas. Por ello, generamos líneas transgénicas de Arabidopsis con fusiones de los promoters de RbohD y RbohF a los genes delatores de la B-glucuronidasa y la luciferasa. Estas líneas fueron empleadas para revelar el patrón de expresión diferencial de RbohD y RbohF durante la respuesta inmune de Arabidopsis a la bacteria patógena Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, el hongo necrótrofo Plectosphaerella cucumerina y en respuesta a señales relacionadas con la respuesta inmune. Nuestros experimentos revelan un patrón de expresión diferencial de los promotores de RbohD y RbohF durante el desarrollo de la planta y en la respuesta inmune de Arabidopsis. Además hemos puesto de manifiesto que existe una correlación entre el nivel de actividad de los promotores de RbohD y RbohF con la acumulación de ROS y el nivel de muerte celular en respuesta a patógenos. La expression de RbohD y RbohF también es modulada de manera diferencial en respuesta a patrones moleculares asociados a patógenos (PAMPs) y por ácido abscísico (ABA). Cabe destacar que, mediante una estrategia de intercambio de promotores, hemos revelado que la región promotora de RbohD, es necesaria para dirigir la producción de ROS en respuesta a P. cucumerina. Adicionalmente, la activación del promotor de RbohD en respuesta al aislado de P. cucumerina no adaptado a Arabidopsis 2127, nos llevó a realizar ensayos de susceptibilidad con el doble mutante rbohD rbohF que han revelado un papel desconocido de estas oxidasas en resistencia no-huesped. La interacción entre la señalización dependiente de las RBOHs y otros componentes de la respuesta inmune de plantas podría explicar también las distintas funciones que median estas oxidasas en relación con la respuesta inmune. Entre la gran cantidad de señales coordinadas con la actividad de las RBOHs, existen evidencias genéticas y farmacológicas que indican que las proteínas G heterotriméricas están implicadas en algunas de las rutas de señalización mediadas por ROS derivadas de los RBOHs en respuesta a señales ambientales. Por ello hemos estudiado la relación entre estas RBOH-NADPH oxidasas y AGB1, la subunidad β de las proteínas G heterotriméricas en la respuesta inmune de Arabidopsis. Análisis de epistasis indican que las proteínas G heterotriméricas están implicadas en distintas rutas de señalización en defensa mediadas por las RBOHs. Nuestros resultados ilustran la relación compleja entre la señalización mediada por las RBOHs y las proteínas G heterotriméricas, que varía en función de la interacción planta-patógeno analizada. Además, hemos explorado la posible asociación entre AGB1 con RBOHD y RBOHF en eventos tempranos de la respuesta immune. Cabe señalar que experimentos de coímmunoprecipitación apuntan a una posible asociación entre AGB1 y la kinasa citoplasmática reguladora de RBOHD, BIK1. Esto indica un posible mecanismo de control de la función de esta NADPH oxidase por AGB1. En conjunto, estos datos aportan nuevas perspectivas sobre cómo, a través del control transcripcional o mediante la interacción con las proteínas G heterotriméricas, las NADPH oxidases de plantas median la producción de ROS y la señalización por ROS en la respuesta inmune. Nuestro trabajo ejemplifica cómo la regulación diferencial de dos miembros de una familia multigénica, les permite realizar distintas funciones fisiológicas especializadas usando un mismo mecanismo enzimático. ABSTRACT The plant NADPH oxidases, termed respiratory burst oxidase homologues (RBOHs), produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) which mediate a wide range of functions. Fine tuning this ROS production provides the signaling specificity to the plant cell to produce the appropriate response to environmental threats. RbohD and RbohF, two of the ten Rboh genes present in Arabidopsis, are pleiotropic and mediate diverse physiological processes in response to pathogens. One aspect that may prove critical to determine the multiplicity of functions of RbohD and RbohF is the spatio-temporal control of their gene expression. Thus, we generated Arabidopsis transgenic lines with RbohD- and RbohF-promoter fusions to the β-glucuronidase and the luciferase reporter genes. These transgenics were employed to reveal RbohD and RbohF promoter activity during Arabidopsis immune response to the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000, the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina and in response to immunity-related cues. Our experiments revealed a differential expression pattern of RbohD and RbohF throughout plant development and during Arabidopsis immune response. Moreover, we observed a correlation between the level of RbohD and RbohF promoter activity, the accumulation of ROS and the amount of cell death in response to pathogens. RbohD and RbohF gene expression was also differentially modulated by pathogen associated molecular patterns and abscisic acid. Interestingly, a promoter-swap strategy revealed the requirement for the promoter region of RbohD to drive the production of ROS in response to P. cucumerina. Additionally, since the RbohD promoter was activated during Arabidopsis interaction with a non-adapted P. cucumerina isolate 2127, we performed susceptibility tests to this fungal isolate that uncovered a new role of these oxidases on non-host resistance. The interplay between RBOH-dependent signaling with other components of the plant immune response might also explain the different immunity-related functions mediated by these oxidases. Among the plethora of signals coordinated with RBOH activity, pharmacological and genetic evidence indicates that heterotrimeric G proteins are involved in some of the signaling pathways mediated by RBOH–derived ROS in response to environmental cues. Therefore, we analysed the interplay between these RBOH-NADPH oxidases and AGB1, the Arabidopsis β-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins during Arabidopsis immune response. We carried out epistasis studies that allowed us to test the implication of AGB1 in different RBOH-mediated defense signaling pathways. Our results illustrate the complex relationship between RBOH and heterotrimeric G proteins signaling, that varies depending on the type of plant-pathogen interaction. Furthermore, we tested the potential association between AGB1 with RBOHD and RBOHF during early immunity. Interestingly, our co-immunoprecipitation experiments point towards an association of AGB1 and the RBOHD regulatory kinase BIK1, thus providing a putative mechanism in the control of the NADPH oxidase function by AGB1. Taken all together, these studies provide further insights into the role that transcriptional control or the interaction with heterotrimeric G-proteins have on RBOH-NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS production and signaling in immunity. Our work exemplifies how, through a differential regulation, two members of a multigenic family achieve specialized physiological functions using a common enzymatic mechanism.