Approach to the use of indicators for the assessment of the environmental level of construction products

The European construction industry is supposed to consume the 40% of the natural European resources and to generate the 40% of the European solid waste. Conscious of the great damage being suffered by the environment because of construction activity, this work tries to provide the building actors with a new tool to improve the current situation. The tool proposed is a model for the comprehensive evaluation of construction products by determining their environmental level. In this research, the environmental level of a construction product has been defined as its quality of accomplishing the construction requirements needed by causing the minimum ecological impact in its surrounding environment. This information allows building actors to choose suitable materials for building needs and also for the environment, mainly in the project stage or on the building site, contributing to improve the relationship between buildings and environment. For the assessment of the environmental level of construction products, five indicators have been identified regarding their global environmental impact through the product life cycle: CO2 emissions provoked during their production, volume and toxicity of waste generated on the building site, durability and recycling capacity after their useful life. Therefore, the less environmental impact one construction product produces, the higher environmental level performs. The model has been tested in 30 construction products that include environmental criteria in their description. The results obtained will be discussed in this article. Furthermore, this model can lay down guidelines for the selection of ecoefficient construction products and the design of new eco-competitive and eco-committed ones

Legal Aspects which Implement Good Practice Measures in the Management of Construction and Demolition Waste

The construction industry, one of the most important ones in the development of a country, generates unavoidable impacts on the environment. The social demand towards greater respect for the environment is a high and general outcry. Therefore, the construction industry needs to reduce the impact it produces. Proper waste management is not enough; we must take a further step in environmental management, where new measures need to be introduced for the prevention at source, such as good practices to promote recycling. Following the amendment of the legal frame applicable to Construction and Demolition Waste (C&D waste), important developments have been incorporated in European and International laws, aiming to promote the culture of reusing and recycling. This change of mindset, that is progressively taking place in society, is allowing for the consideration of C&D waste no longer as an unusable waste, but as a reusable material. The main objective of the work presented in this paper is to enhance C&D waste management systems through the development of preventive measures during the construction process. These measures concern all the agents intervening in the construction process as only the personal implication of all of them can ensure an efficient management of the C&D waste generated. Finally, a model based on preventive measures achieves organizational cohesion between the different stages of the construction process, as well as promoting the conservation of raw materials through the use and waste minimization. All of these in order to achieve a C&D waste management system, whose primary goal is zero waste generation

A proposal for improving safety in construction projects by strengthening coordinators’ competencies in health and safety issues

The figure of the coordinator in health and safety issues in the construction sector first appeared in our legislation through the incorporation of the European Directives (in our case Royal Decree 1627/97 on the minimum health and safety regulations in construction works), and is viewed differently in different countries of the European Union regarding the way they are hired and their role in the construction industry. Coordinating health and safety issues is also a management process that requires certain competencies that are not only based on technical or professional training, but which, taking account of the work environment, require the use of strategies and tools that are related to experience and personal skills. Through a piece of research that took account of expert opinions in the matter, we have found which competencies need to be possessed by the health and safety coordinator in order to improve the safety in the works they are coordinating. The conclusions of the analyses performed using the appropriate statistical methods (comparing means and multivariate analysis techniques), will enable training programmes to be designed and ensure that the health and safety coordinators selected have the competencies required to carry out their duties.

A proposal for improving safety in construction projects by strengthening coordinators’ competencies in health and safety issues

The figure of the coordinator in health and safety issues in the construction sector first appeared in our legislation through the incorporation of the European Directives (in our case Royal Decree 1627/97 on the minimum health and safety regulations in construction works), and is viewed differently in different countries of the European Union regarding the way they are hired and their role in the construction industry. Coordinating health and safety issues is also a management process that requires certain competencies that are not only based on technical or professional training, but which, taking account of the work environment, require the use of strategies and tools that are related to experience and personal skills. Through a piece of research that took account of expert opinions in the matter, we have found which competencies need to be possessed by the health and safety coordinator in order to improve the safety in the works they are coordinating. The conclusions of the analyses performed using the appropriate statistical methods (comparing means and multivariate analysis techniques), will enable training programmes to be designed and ensure that the health and safety coordinators selected have the competencies required to carry out their duties.

Learning from incidents during bridge erection

Bridge building is a highly uncertain endeavour that entails considerable risk, as attested to by the succession of construction-related incidents and accidents recently reported in Spain and elsewhere. While efforts are being made to improve on-site safety, many issues are still outstanding, such as the establishment of reliability requirements for the ancillary systems used. The problems that must be dealt with in everyday practice, however, are more elementary and often attributable to human error. The overall organisation of the use of bridge construction equipment is in need of improvement. Close cooperation between the bridge engineers responsible for construction planning and ancillary element suppliers is imperative, for flawed interaction between building equipment and the bridge under construction may generate structural vulnerability. External quality assurance should likewise be mandatory

Sostenibilidad en el sector de la construcción. Sostenibilidad en estructuras y puentes ferroviarios

La escasez de recursos, el cambio climático, la pobreza y el subdesarrollo, los desastres naturales, son solo algunos de los grandes retos a que se enfrenta la humanidad y a los que la economía verde y el desarrollo sostenible tienen que dar respuesta. El concepto sostenible surge a raíz de la necesidad de lograr en todas las actividades humanas un nuevo equilibrio con el medioambiente, la sociedad y la economía, es decir un desarrollo más sostenible. La construcción supone en este nuevo concepto un sector básico, con grandes impactos en los recursos, los residuos, las emisiones, la biodiversidad, el paisaje, las necesidades sociales, la integración, el desarrollo económico del entorno, etc. Es por ello, que la construcción sostenible tiene una importancia esencial como demuestra su amplia aplicación teórica y práctica ya en proyectos de planificación urbana y de edificación. En la ingeniería civil estas aproximaciones son todavía mínimas, aunque ya se están considerando ciertos criterios de sostenibilidad en proyectos de construcción. La construcción consume muchos recursos naturales, económicos y tiene gran incidencia social. En la actualidad su actividad consume un 30% de los recursos extraídos de la tierra y la energía, y en consecuencia genera el 30% de los gases de efecto invernadero y residuos sólidos del mundo (EEA, 2014). Este impacto debería suponer una gran responsabilidad para los profesionales y gobiernos que toman cada día las decisiones de diseño e inversión en la construcción, y su máxima eficiencia debería estar muy presente entre los objetivos. En esta tesis doctoral se plantea un nuevo modelo para la evaluación de la sostenibilidad en los proyectos mediante un sistema de indicadores, basados en las áreas de estudio de las certificaciones de sostenibilidad existentes y en un análisis multi-criterio de cada uno de los axiomas de la sostenibilidad. Como reto principal se marca la propuesta de una metodología que permita identificar, priorizar y seleccionar los indicadores y las variables más importantes de lo que es considerado como una construcción sostenible en el caso de infraestructuras ferroviarias, más concretamente en puentes ferroviarios, y que además sirva para priorizar nuevos proyectos que se adapten a los nuevos objetivos del desarrollo sostenible: el respeto al medioambiente, la integración social y la económica. El objetivo es la aplicación de estos indicadores desde las etapas más tempranas del proyecto: planificación, diseño de alternativas y selección de alternativas. Para ello, en primer lugar, se ha realizado un análisis en profundidad de los distintas organizaciones de certificación de la sostenibilidad mundiales y se ha desarrollado una comparativa entre ellas, detallando el funcionamiento de las más extendidas (BREEAM, LEED, VERDE, DGNB). Tras esto, se ha analizado la herramienta matemática MIVES de análisis multi-criterio para su aplicación, en la tesis, a las infraestructuras ferroviarias. En la segunda parte se desarrolla para las estructuras ferroviarias un nuevo modelo de indicadores, un sistema de ayuda a la decisión multi-criterio basado en los tres axiomas de las sostenibilidad (sociedad, medioambiente y economía), articulados en un árbol de requerimientos inspirado en el método MIVES, que propone una metodología para el caso de las infraestructuras ferroviarias. La metodología MIVES estructura el proceso de decisión en tres ramas: Requisitos, componentes y ciclo de vida. Estas ramas definen los límites de los sistemas. El eje de los requisitos del árbol de los requisitos o se estructura en tres niveles que corresponden al requisito específico: criterios e indicadores. Además, es necesario definen la función del valor para cada indicador, definen el peso de importancia de cada elemento del árbol y finalmente con el calcular el valor de cada alternativa selecciona el mejor de él. La generación de este árbol de requerimientos en estructuras ferroviarias y la medición de los parámetro es original para este tipo de estructuras. Por último, tras el desarrollo de la metodología, se ha aplicado la propuesta metodológica mediante la implementación práctica, utilizando el método propuesto con 2 puentes ferroviarios existentes. Los resultados han mostrado que la herramienta es capaz de establecer una ordenación de las actuaciones coherente y suficientemente discriminante como para que el decisor no tenga dudas cuando deba tomar la decisión. Esta fase, es una de las grandes aportaciones de la tesis, ya que permite diferenciar los pesos obtenidos en cada una de las áreas de estudio y donde la toma de decisión puede variar dependiendo de las necesidades del decisor, la ubicación del puente de estudio etc. ABSTRACT Scarce resources, climate change, poverty and underdevelopment, natural disasters are just some of the great challenges facing humanity and to which the green economy will have to respond. The sustainable concept arises from the need for all human activities in a new equilibrium with the environment, society and the economy, which is known as sustainable development. The construction industry is part of this concept, because of its major impacts on resources, waste, emissions, biodiversity, landscape, social needs, integration, economical development, environment, etc. Therefore, sustainable construction has a critical importance as already demonstrated by its wide application and theoretical practice in urban planning and building projects. In civil engineering, these approaches are still minimal, although some criteria are already taken into account for sustainability in infrastructure projects. The construction industry requires a lot of natural resources, has a real economic relevance and a huge social impact. Currently, it consumes 40% of produced power as well as natural resources extracted from the earth and thus leads to an environmental impact of 40% regarding greenhouse gas emissions and solid wastes (EEA 2014). These repercussions should highly concern our governments and professional of this industry on the decisions they take regarding investments and designs. They must be inflexible in order to ensure that the main concern has to be a maximum efficiency. Major events like the COP21 held in Paris in December 2015 are a concrete signal of the worldwide awareness of the huge impact of each industry on climate. In this doctoral thesis a new model for the evaluation of the sustainability in the projects by means of a system of indicators, based on the areas of study of the existing certifications of sustainability and on an analysis considers multi-criterion of each one of the axioms of the sustainability. The primary aim of this thesis is to study the mode of application of sustainability in projects through a system of indicators. . The main challenge consists of create a methodology suitable to identify, prioritize and select the most important indicators which define if a building is sustainable in the specific case of railway infrastructures. The methodology will help to adapt future projects to the new goals of sustainable development which are respect of nature, social integration and economic relevance. A crucial point is the consideration of these indicators from the very beginning steps of the projects: planning, design and alternatives reflections. First of all, a complete inventory of all world energy certification organizations has been made in order to compare the most representative ones regarding their way of functioning (BREEAM, LEED, VERDE, DGNB). After this, mathematical tool MIVES of analysis has been analyzed multi-criterion for its application, in the thesis, to railway infrastructures. The second part of the thesis is aimed to develop a new model of indicators, inspired by the MIVES method, consisting in a decision-making system based on the 3 foundations of sustainability: nature impact, social concerns, and economic relevance. The methodology MIVES structures the decision process in three axes: Requirements, components and life cycle. These axes define the boundaries of the systems. The axis of requirements o tree requirements is structured in three levels corresponding to specific requirement: criteria and indicators. In addition, is necessary define the value function for each indicator, define the weight of importance of each element of the tree and finally with the calculate the value of each alternative select the best of them. The generation of this tree requirements in railway structures and measuring the parameter is original for this type of structures. Finally, after the development of the methodology, it has validated the methodology through practical implementation, applying the proposed method 2 existing railway bridges. The results showed that the tool is able to establish a coherent management of performances and discriminating enough so that the decision maker should not have doubts when making the decision. This phase, is one of the great contributions of the thesis, since it allows to differentiate the weights obtained in each one from the study areas and where the decision making can vary depending on the necessities of the decisor, the location of the bridge of study etc.