Project based learning activities as a means of adapting conventional curricula to the demands of the 21st century aeronautical engineer: The design and building of the EYEFLY 1.

In this paper we report the process of designing and building the EYEFLY 1, a real UAS platform which has just performed its maiden flight. For the development of this aircraft, 30 groups of students from successive years at the Escuela Universitaria de Ingeniería Técnica Aeronáutica (EUITA) of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) carried out their compulsory End of Degree Project as a coordinated Project Based learning activity. Our conclusions clearly indicate that Project Based Learning activities can provide a valid complement to more conventional, theoretically-based, teaching methods. The combination of both approaches will allow us to maintain traditional but well-tested methods for providing our students with a sound knowledge of fundamental engineering disciplines and, at the same time, to introduce our students to exciting and relevant engineering situations and sceneries where social and business skills, such as communication skills, team-working or decision-taking, can be put into practice.

Changes in the governance system for higher education in Peru to meet the challenges of the 21st century

The competition in markets, the distribution of limited resources based on productivity and performance, and the efficient management of universities are changing the criteria of trust and legitimacy of the educational system in Peru. Universities are perceived more as institutions of the public sector, while the services they offer must rather contribute to the modernization of the emerging society and the knowledge economy. Higher Educations reforms - initiated in the 1980s - have been inspired by the successful university organizations that have managed to change their governance and addressed to transform certain bureaucratic institutions into organizations capable of playing active role in this global competition for resources and best talent. Within this context, Peruvian universities are facing two major challenges: adapting themselves to new global perspectives and being able to develop a better response to society demands, needs and expectations. This article proposes a model of governance system for higher education in Peru that gives a comprehensive solution to these challenges, allowing dealing with the problems of universities for their development and inclusion within the global trends. For this purpose, a holistic and qualitative methodologic approach was developed, considering an integrated method which considered educational reality as a whole, understanding its facts, components and elements that affects its outcomes. It is proposed to define a policy for university education in Peru that permeates society, by changing the planning model from a social reform model to a policy analysis model, where the Peruvian State acts as sole responsible for responding to the demanding society as its legal representative complemented with some external and independent bodies that define the basis of best practice, as it is being done in many university models worldwide.

Peter Celsing en el complejo de Sergels Torg : la Casa de la Cultura de Estocolmo

La tesis ≪Peter Celsing en el complejo de Sergels torg. La Casa de la Cultura de Estocolmo ≫ intenta profundizar en la obra de este autor, en sus conexiones con otras arquitecturas y arquitectos de su entorno físico y temporal, que constituye uno de los episodios más interesantes y menos conocidos de la arquitectura nórdica. El objeto particular de estudio es la Casa de la Cultura dentro del complejo de Sergels torg como pieza clave que marca un antes y un después en su trayectoria. Se observa un proceso de desarrollo constante, que se fue gestando paulatinamente, y que en este ejercicio alcanza su punto álgido. Además, los proyectos que coexistieron con su evolución, y los posteriores, filtraron las inquietudes latentes del mayor reto al que se había enfrentado, dando pie a resultados novedosos en su producción. La investigación se estructura en tres capítulos. El primero, ≪Aprendizaje≫, examina sus experiencias de juventud, viajes de estudios y lecciones de sus maestros; así como sus inicios profesionales en el proyecto de restauración de la Catedral de Uppsala y en sus iglesias junto a Lewerentz. En ese periodo prima lo formal y escultórico, el hormigón y el ladrillo artesanal, y como referencia Le Corbusier y la capilla de Ronchamp. El segundo capítulo, ≪Obra≫, estudia el concurso que da origen a la Casa de la Cultura, su proceso de gestación y diseño, y las modificaciones posteriores durante su construcción. De repente emergen las cualidades espaciales y los sistemas estructurales aprendidos de Mies en el Crown Hall de Chicago, la gran escala de la metrópoli y las soluciones industriales ligeras. El tercer capítulo, ≪Madurez≫, sirve de cierre, y revisa su trayectoria posterior con relación a la obra referida. Tras este edificio, el diseño de las propuestas coetáneas se vuelve más abstracto y sencillo, gana en autonomía, rotundidad, atrevimiento y carácter. Las conclusiones verifican el cambio de actitud y de paradigmas. Hay elementos como las distorsiones, los contrastes y las manipulaciones, aprendidas en sus primeros años de formación y junto a Lewerentz, si bien es cierto que ahora han aumentado proporcionalmente a la escala de sus intervenciones e incluso se observan en el detalle, como sucede en el encuentro de los materiales y su montaje. Su visión, su punto de vista se eleva, y la pieza adopta una volumetría compacta y unitaria. Cada nuevo trabajo sintetiza un enfoque más universal y abierto en conceptos y metodología operativa. Sus preocupaciones nos hablan de un arquitecto consciente de su tiempo y cuya arquitectura final mira ya al siglo XXI. ABSTRACT The thesis ≪Peter Celsing in the complex of Sergels torg. The House of Culture in Stockholm ≫ delves deeper into the work of this author, in his connections with other architectures and architects of his physical and temporal surroundings, which is one of the most interesting and least known episodes of Nordic architecture. The particular focus of this study is how the House of Culture, a key point within the complex of Sergels torg, marks a before and after in his career. There is an observable process of constant development, which was growing steadily, and reaches its critical point in this exercise. In addition, the projects that coexisted during his evolution and those that came before, reveal latent concerns leading up to the biggest challenge he would face, ultimately giving way to new developments in his work. The study is divided into three chapters. The first, ≪Learning≫, examines his experiences as a youth, academic trips and lessons from his masters; as well as his professional beginnings alongside Lewerentz in the restoration project of Uppsala Cathedral and his churches. In that period the formal and sculptural were given preference, also concrete and handmade brick. And as reference, there is Le Corbusier and the chapel at Ronchamp. The second chapter, ≪Work≫, studies the competition that gives rise to the House of Culture, the gestation process and design and subsequent amendments during its construction. Suddenly the spatial qualities and structural systems learned from Mies in Crown Hall of Chicago emerge, the large scale of the metropolis and light industrial solutions. The third chapter, ≪Maturity≫, serves as the closure and examines his subsequent career in relation to said work. After this building, the design of coetaneous proposals become more abstract and simple, gaining autonomy, firmness, boldness and character. The conclusions verify the change in attitudes and paradigms. There are elements such as distortions, contrasts and manipulations, learned in his early years of training and with Lewerentz, that have now undeniably increased in proportion to the scale of their involvement and can even be observed in detail, as so happens in the joining of materials and assembly. His vision, his point of view is heightened, and the piece adopts a single and compact volume. Each new work synthesizes a more universal and open focus in concepts and operational methodology. His concerns speak of an architect aware of his time and whose final architecture now looks toward the 21st century.