1 resultado para 1-4
em Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archive of European Integration (12)
- Aston University Research Archive (12)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (25)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (18)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (63)
- Bioline International (3)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (49)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (6)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (172)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (20)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (9)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (18)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- eScholarship Repository - University of California (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (83)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (21)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (102)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (39)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (31)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (80)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Michigan (91)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
Resumo:
ML 1.4 is widely accepted as the standard for representing the various software artifacts generated by a development process. For this reason, there have been attempts to use this language to represent the software architec- ture of systems as well. Unfortunately, these attempts have ended in representa- tions (boxes and lines) already criticized by the software architecture commu- nity. Recently, OMG has published a draft that will constitute the future UML 2.0 specification. In this paper we compare the capacities of UML 1.4 and UML 2.0 to describe software architectures. In particular, we study extensions of both UML versions to describe the static view of the C3 architectural style (a simplification of the C2 style). One of the results of this study is the difficulties found when using the UML 2.0 metamodel to describe the concept of connector in a software architecture.