47 resultados para Escuela arquitectura
Resumo:
The European Union has been promoting linguistic diversity for many years as one of its main educational goals. This is an element that facilitates student mobility and student exchanges between different universities and countries and enriches the education of young undergraduates. In particular, a higher degree of competence in the English language is becoming essential for engineers, architects and researchers in general, as English has become the lingua franca that opens up horizons to internationalisation and the transfer of knowledge in today’s world. Many experts point to the Integrated Approach to Contents and Foreign Languages System as being an option that has certain benefits over the traditional method of teaching a second language that is exclusively based on specific subjects. This system advocates teaching the different subjects in the syllabus in a language other than one’s mother tongue, without prioritising knowledge of the language over the subject. This was the idea that in the 2009/10 academic year gave rise to the Second Language Integration Programme (SLI Programme) at the Escuela Arquitectura Técnica in the Universidad Politécnica Madrid (EUATM-UPM), just at the beginning of the tuition of the new Building Engineering Degree, which had been adapted to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) model. This programme is an interdisciplinary initiative for the set of subjects taught during the semester and is coordinated through the Assistant Director Office for Educational Innovation. The SLI Programme has a dual goal; to familiarise students with the specific English terminology of the subject being taught, and at the same time improve their communication skills in English. A total of thirty lecturers are taking part in the teaching of eleven first year subjects and twelve in the second year, with around 120 students who have voluntarily enrolled in a special group in each semester. During the 2010/2011 academic year the degree of acceptance and the results of the SLI Programme have been monitored. Tools have been designed to aid interdisciplinary coordination and to analyse satisfaction, such as coordination records and surveys. The results currently available refer to the first and second year and are divided into specific aspects of the different subjects involved and into general aspects of the ongoing experience.
Resumo:
The European Union has been promoting linguistic diversity for many years as one of its main educational goals. This is an element that facilitates student mobility and student exchanges between different universities and countries and enriches the education of young undergraduates. In particular,a higher degree of competence in the English language is becoming essential for engineers, architects and researchers in general, as English has become the lingua franca that opens up horizons to internationalisation and the transfer of knowledge in today’s world. Many experts point to the Integrated Approach to Contents and Foreign Languages System as being an option that has certain benefits over the traditional method of teaching a second language that is exclusively based on specific subjects. This system advocates teaching the different subjects in the syllabus in a language other than one’s mother tongue, without prioritising knowledge of the language over the subject. This was the idea that in the 2009/10 academic year gave rise to the Second Language Integration Programme (SLI Programme) at the Escuela Arquitectura Tecnica in the Universidad Politecnica Madrid (EUATM-UPM), just at the beginning of the tuition of the new Building Engineering Degree, which had been adapted to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) model. This programme is an interdisciplinary initiative for the set of subjects taught during the semester and is coordinated through the Assistant Director Office for Educational Innovation. The SLI Programme has a dual goal; to familiarise students with the specific English terminology of the subject being taught, and at the same time improve their communication skills in English. A total of thirty lecturers are taking part in the teaching of eleven first year subjects and twelve in the second year, with around 120 students who have voluntarily enrolled in a special group in each semester. During the 2010/2011 academic year the degree of acceptance and the results of the SLI Programme are being monitored. Tools have been designed to aid interdisciplinary coordination and to analyse satisfaction, such as coordination records and surveys. The results currently available refer to the first semester of the year and are divided into specific aspects of the different subjects involved and into general aspects of the ongoing experience.
Resumo:
Muchos son los aspectos que interesan en la arquitectura de Lacaton y Vassal y que son analizados en los distintos artículos que se incluyen en esta publicación. En ocasiones, las acciones humanas tienen la cualidad de despertar un interés que va más allá del objeto mismo para el que fueron realizadas. La mayor parte de los proyectos y obras de Lacaton y Vassal posee esta cualidad que, entre otras cosas, se traduce en un alto valor pedagógico que, en este caso, tiene carácter metodológico.
Resumo:
xxx
Resumo:
Ponencia en las jornadas de investigación en arquitectura y urbanismo organizadas por la ETSAM.
Resumo:
Un siglo de historia de la enseñanza de los materiales de construcción en la escuela de arquitectura de Madrid (1844-1946)
Resumo:
La construcción de una bóveda de crucería en la Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid
Resumo:
Arquitectura española contemporánea. Dos proyectos de alumnos de la Escuela de Madrid
Resumo:
La Exposición de trabajos de los alumnos de la Escuela Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid
Resumo:
La reproducción gráfica de nuestros monumentos y la Escuela de Arquitectura de Madrid
Resumo:
Sobre la creación de un seminario de arqueología monumental en la Escuela Superior de Arquitectura
Resumo:
Los jóvenes ante la elección de carrera [Conferencia pronunciada por D. Luis Moya profesor de la Escuela de Arquitectura y antiguo alumno del Colegio del Pilar]
Resumo:
El examen a la singular aportación de João Archer, Nunes de Almeida y Rogério Ramos a la construcción del paisaje energético a través de la arquitectura se revela hoy de gran oportunidad para el avance de nuestra disciplina. Este colectivo de arquitectos que estudian en la Escuela de Oporto en el periodo en que el maestro Carlos Ramos realiza la reforma de la enseñanza de la Arquitectura en Portugal, proyecta y construye desde el interior del oficio de proyectos de la Hidroeléctica do Douro, las tres infraestructuras hidroeléctricas y las respectivas estructuras urbanas de Picote, Miranda y Bemposta, ubicadas en el Duero Internacional. El proceso cuyos parámetros de proyecto se exponen, está comprendido entre 1953 y 1964, y representa uno de los momentos más significativos y hercúleos en términos de infraestructura, industrialización y modernización de un Portugal entonces extremamente retrasado por la política de aislamiento de la dictadura de Salazar. Esto parece ser también el primer proyecto arquitectónico de infraestructuras a la escala del territorio en el cual se reconocen trazos específicos de la Escuela de Oporto y en donde se efectúa la revisión y transición de una modernidad enmarcada por el rigor de Loos y por un racionalismo de linaje gropiano, para un regionalismo crítico apropiado a la cultura del lugar, muy vinculado a Lúcio Costa, Wright y Aalto. Así, más que los logros espaciales, técnicos o constructivos conseguidos en los edificios, se expone el proceso utilizado por sus autores, su forma de entender y hacer un paisaje industrial de dimensión social y humanista a través de una arquitectura poética y minimalista sustentada en la cultura y en el carácter del lugar, valorando los argumentos, herramientas, principios y mecanismos que pueden constituirse referencia para nuestro oficio y aportar conocimiento que oriente la arquitectura hacia la construcción del paisaje contemporáneo. ABSTRACT Examining the singular contribution of João Archer, Nunes de Almeida and Rogério Ramos to the construction of the energy landscape through architecture, presents today a great opportunity for the advancement of our discipline. This collective of architects studying at the Porto School during the period in which master Carlos Ramos reformed the education of architecture in Portugal, designed and built from the Hidroeléctrica do Douro project office itself, the three hydropower infrastructures and the respective urban structures of Picote), Miranda and Bemposta, located in the International Douro. The project parameters are set between 1953 and 1964, representing one of the most significant moments of infrastructure, industrialization and modernization in a country at the time extremely delayed by the isolation resulting from the Salazar dictatorship. This is also the first architectural project of infrastructures within the scale of territory in which specific traits of the Porto School are recognized and wherein it came into effect the revision and transition from a modernity marked by the Loos rigor and Gropius rationalism lineage to a critical regionalism appropriate to the culture of the place, connected to Lúcio Costa, Wright and Aalto. Thus, rather than space, technical or constructive achievements of the buildings, it is exposed the process used by the authors, their way of understanding and projecting an industrial landscape with a social and humanistic dimension through a poetic and minimal architecture sustained in culture and character of the place, valuing arguments, tools, principles and mechanisms that can become a reference for our profession and provide knowledge to guide architecture towards the construction of the contemporary landscape.
