A Note of Zipf's Law, Natural Languages, and Noncoding DNA Regions

In Phys. Rev. Letters (73:2), Mantegna et al. conclude on the basis of Zipf rank frequency data that noncoding DNA sequence regions are more like natural languages than coding regions. We argue on the contrary that an empirical fit to Zipf"s "law" cannot be used as a criterion for similarity to natural languages. Although DNA is a presumably "organized system of signs" in Mandelbrot"s (1961) sense, and observation of statistical featurs of the sort presented in the Mantegna et al. paper does not shed light on the similarity between DNA's "gramar" and natural language grammars, just as the observation of exact Zipf-like behavior cannot distinguish between the underlying processes of tossing an M-sided die or a finite-state branching process.

MicroRNAs Modulate Hematopoietic Lineage Differentiation

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), an abundant class of ~22 nucleotide non-coding RNAs, are thought to play an important regulatory role in animal and plant development at the posttranscriptional level. Many miRNAs cloned from mouse bone marrow cells are differentially regulated in various hematopoietic lineages, suggesting that they might influence hematopoietic lineage differentiation. Some human miRNAs are linked to leukemias: the miR-15a/miR-16 locus is frequently deleted or down-regulated in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and miR-142 is at a translocation site found in a case of aggressive B-cell leukemia. miR-181, a miRNA upregulated only in the B cell lineage of mouse bone marrow cells, promotes B cell differentiation and inhibits production of CD8⁺ T cells when expressed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. In contrast miR-142s inhibits production of both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and does not affect B cells. Collectively, these results indicate that microRNAs are components of the molecular circuitry controlling mouse hematopoiesis and suggest that other microRNAs have similar regulatory roles during other facets of vertebrate development.