1 resultado para Employee rules
em Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (6)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (6)
- Archive of European Integration (110)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (11)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (45)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (81)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (25)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (49)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (10)
- Digital Peer Publishing (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (10)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (11)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (13)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (74)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (157)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (22)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (26)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (6)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
How can we insure that knowledge embedded in a program is applied effectively? Traditionally the answer to this question has been sought in different problem solving paradigms and in different approaches to encoding and indexing knowledge. Each of these is useful with a certain variety of problem, but they all share a common problem: they become ineffective in the face of a sufficiently large knowledge base. How then can we make it possible for a system to continue to function in the face of a very large number of plausibly useful chunks of knowledge? In response to this question we propose a framework for viewing issues of knowledge indexing and retrieval, a framework that includes what appears to be a useful perspective on the concept of a strategy. We view strategies as a means of controlling invocation in situations where traditional selection mechanisms become ineffective. We examine ways to effect such control, and describe meta-rules, a means of specifying strategies which offers a number of advantages. We consider at some length how and when it is useful to reason about control, and explore the advantages meta-rules offer for doing this.