214 resultados para Prior Probability
em University of Michigan
Resumo:
Frequentist statistical methods continue to predominate in many areas of science despite prominent calls for "statistical reform." They do so in part because their main rivals, Bayesian methods, appeal to prior probability distributions that arguably lack an objective justification in typical cases. Some methodologists find a third approach called likelihoodism attractive because it avoids important objections to frequentism without appealing to prior probabilities. However, likelihoodist methods do not provide guidance for belief or action, but only assessments of data as evidence. I argue that there is no good way to use those assessments to guide beliefs or actions without appealing to prior probabilities, and that as a result likelihoodism is not a viable alternative to frequentism and Bayesianism for statistical reform efforts in science.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Oct. 1978.
Resumo:
Reproduced from type-written copy.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Original mimeographed ed. published in 1938 under title: Lectures and conferences on mathematical statistics.
Resumo:
Cf. MacLean, J.P. Shaker lit., 214.
Resumo:
"Serial No. 15"
Resumo:
The 1st ed. issued in French and English only as Its Publication no. 629.
Resumo:
Reports cover 1888-1890.