11 resultados para Failure to Yield Violation.
em University of Michigan
Resumo:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
Resumo:
Added t.-p.: Moore, J. B. International adjudications, ancient and modern ... Modern series. vol. IV.
Resumo:
Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Transportation Planning Division, Austin
Resumo:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
Resumo:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
Resumo:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
Resumo:
On February 16, 2005, about 0913 mountain standard time, a Cessna Citation 560, N500AT, operated by Martinair, Inc., for Circuit City Stores, Inc., crashed about 4 nautical miles east of Pueblo Memorial Airport, Pueblo, Colorado, while on an instrument landing system approach to runway 26R. The two pilots and six passengers on board were killed, and the airplane was destroyed by impact forces and postcrash fire. The flight was operating under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 on an instrument flight rules flight plan. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the flight crew's failure to effectively monitor and maintain airspeed and comply with procedures for deice boot activation on the approach, which caused an aerodynamic stall from which they did not recover. Contributing to the accident was the Federal Aviation Administration's failure to establish adequate certification requirements for flight into icing conditions, which led to the inadequate stall warning margin provided by the airplane's stall warning system.
Resumo:
We introduce a family of rules for adjusting one’s credences in response to learning the credences of others. These rules have a number of desirable features. 1. They yield the posterior credences that would result from updating by standard Bayesian conditionalization on one’s peers’ reported credences if one’s likelihood function takes a particular simple form. 2. In the simplest form, they are symmetric among the agents in the group. 3. They map neatly onto the familiar Condorcet voting results. 4. They preserve shared agreement about independence in a wide range of cases. 5. They commute with conditionalization and with multiple peer updates. Importantly, these rules have a surprising property that we call synergy — peer testimony of credences can provide mutually supporting evidence raising an individual’s credence higher than any peer’s initial prior report. At first, this may seem to be a strike against them. We argue, however, that synergy is actually a desirable feature and the failure of other updating rules to yield synergy is a strike against them.