Before the Interstate Commerce Commission : City of Spokane ... [and others], petitioners and complainants, vs. Northern Pacific Railway Company ... [and others], defendants; Canadian Pacific Railway Company ... [and others], defendants by order of commission; Pacific Coast Jobbers & Manufacturers' Association ... [and others], intervenors : reply brief of petitioners and complainants /

Cover title.

United States of America, petitioner, v. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey et al., defendants.

At head of title: In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Eastern Judicial District of Missouri.

Arguments of the defendants' counsel, and the judgment of the Supreme Court, U.S., in the case of Vidal and another, complainants and appellants, versus the mayor, c., of Philadelphia, the executors of S. Girard, and others, defendants appellees [microform] : January term, 1844. : to which is added the will of Stephen Girard /

Vidal, et al., versus the city of Philadelphia -- Argument of Horace Binney, Esq., for defendants -- Argument of John Sergeant, Esq. -- Opinion, Supreme Court of the United States, January term, 1844 -- The will of the late Stephen Girard.

United States of America, petitioner, v. Standard oil company of New Jersey et al., defendants ...

Vol. 22 and vol. A [v. 23] contain the "Transcript of record" in this case on appeal to the Supreme court of the United States, October term, 1909, no. 725, and are printed by Judd & Detweiler (inc.), printers, Washington, D.C., 1910.

United States of America, petitioner, vs. American Can Company, et al, defendants. In equity no. 40. Brief for American Can Company ...

Unbound.

The people of the state of New York, compainants, vs. The state of New Jersey and Passaic Valley sewerage commissioners, defendants...

"Foreword", v.1, Signed: Board of estimate and apportionment.

Arguments of the defendants' counsel, and judgment of the Supreme court, U.S. in the case of Vidal and another, complainants and appellants, versus the mayor, &c. of Philadelphia, the executors of S. Girard, [et al.], defendants & appellees. January term, 1844. To which is added the will of Stephen Girard. Printed by order of the Commissioners of the Girard estates.

Mode of access: Internet.

Missouri, Kansas & Texas railway company, et al., plaintiffs vs. J.E. Love et al., defendants ... [and others] General brief upon common questions on behalf of all plaintiffs ... S.T. Bledsoe, Cottingham & Hayes, C.O. Blake ... [and others] attorneys for plaintiffs.

At head of title: In the District court of the United states for the western district of Oklahoma. "Questions involved ... are the validity of the two-cent passenger fare provision of the Oklahoma

An authentic report of the testimony in a cause at issue in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants : taken pursuant to the rules of the court /

"Foster's report"--Spine.

Decision of the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, in a cause between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants. Also the opinion of the Supreme court of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff, and Charles Field, defendant.

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and Hicksite factions.

The Society of Friends vindicated: being the arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a cause decided in the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants.

Published 1833 under title: The arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson.

Arthur F. Naylor, et als., Defendants-Respondents : civil action on appeal from final judgment of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division - Burlington County. Sat below: Goldmann, J. S. C. Appendix to respondents' brief.

At head of title: Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division - Docket no. A-215-53.

Guy T. Helvering, Commissioner and others Defendants-Appellees-Petitioners v. George P. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent : brief for Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent : Edward F. McClennen, Jacob J. Kaplan for the respondent.

At head of title: Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1936, no. 910.

Pittsburg Vein Operators' Association, complainant, vs. the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Company, and B.A. Worthington, receiver of the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Company, defendants. Memorandum respecting allocation of railroad expenses.

Before the Interstate Commerce Commission, no. 4116-1.

In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New-York. Before the Honorable Samuel Nelson and the Honorable Samuel Blatchford. May 5, 1870. James Fisk, Jr., vs. the Union Pacific Railroad Company and others ... Argument of Samuel J. Tilden for defendants, in reply to Mr. Stoughton and Mr. Field.

Mode of access: Internet.