165 resultados para Surplus government property, American


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"This volume, compiled by Clifford P. Reynolds, publications technician of the [Joint] Committee [on Printing], is a revision of the Dictionary of the United States Congress and the general government, published in 1859 and again revised in 1869, by Charles Lanman; the Biographical annals of the civil government of the United States in 1876, by Joseph Lanman and James Anglin, and the Lanman edition of 1876 as corrected by Joseph M. Morrison in 1887; the Political register and congressional directory of 1878; by Ben: Perley Poore; the Biographical congressional directory of 1903, by O. M. Enyart; the Biographical congressional directory in 1911, the Biographical directory of the American Congress of 1927, by Ansel Wold, and the 1949 edition by James L. Harrison."

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Editors: 1890-95, E. J. James; 1896-1900, R. P. Falkner; Jan. 1901-Mar. 1902, H. R. Seager; May 1902-Sept. 1914, E. R. Johnson; Nov. 1914-July 1929, C. L/ King; Sept. 1929- T. Sellin.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

At head of title: 102d Congress, 2d session. Committee print, ser. no. 7.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Prepared by American Society of Planning Officials under contract no. 68-01-1969.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Editors: 1-2, 7, J. B. Childs.--4, 6-15, 17-18 H. V. Besso.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vol. 4, no. 1, includes "a supplement containing an abridgment of the laws of Maryland for the year 1809 (containing those general laws which are omitted in Maxcy's edition) and the acts of general interest passed in 1810, and the commencement of 1811"

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In American historical association. Annual report...for the year 1894. Washington, 1895. p. 403-412.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Title from cover.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"First published in 1934. Printed in Great Britain."

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Counterinsurgency (COIN) requires an integrated military, political, and economic program best developed by teams that field both civilians and soldiers. These units should operate with some independence but under a coherent command. In Vietnam, after several false starts, the United States developed an effective unified organization, Civil Operations and Revolutionary Development Support (CORDS), to guide the counterinsurgency. CORDS had three components absent from our efforts in Afghanistan today: sufficient personnel (particularly civilian), numerous teams, and a single chain of command that united the separate COIN programs of the disparate American departments at the district, provincial, regional, and national levels. This paper focuses on the third issue and describes the benefits that unity of command at every level would bring to the American war in Afghanistan. The work begins with a brief introduction to counterinsurgency theory, using a population-centric model, and examines how this warfare challenges the United States. It traces the evolution of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) and the country team, describing problems at both levels. Similar efforts in Vietnam are compared, where persistent executive attention finally integrated the government's counterinsurgency campaign under the unified command of the CORDS program. The next section attributes the American tendency towards a segregated response to cultural differences between the primary departments, executive neglect, and societal concepts of war. The paper argues that, in its approach to COIN, the United States has forsaken the military concept of unity of command in favor of 'unity of effort' expressed in multiagency literature. The final sections describe how unified authority would improve our efforts in Afghanistan and propose a model for the future."--P. iii.