Texas reports : cases argued and decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Texas.

Subtitle varies.

The Supreme Court and civil liberties; how far has the Court protected the Bill of rights?

Mode of access: Internet.

California digest : being a digest of decisions of the Supreme Court of the state of California /

Caption title on p. [1]: Digest of California decisions.

North Carolina reports : cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Vols. 1-62 reprinted by the State with consecutive numbering and title: North Carolina reports.

Vol. 1 transcript of record. Supreme court of the United States. No. 492. October term, 1916. Oregon & California Railroad Company et al., petitioners, vs. the United States. On writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit. Petition for cetiorari filed October 20, 1916. Certiorari granted November 6, 1916. (25,313).

Mode of access: Internet.

...The state of Missouri vs. the state of Illinois and the Sanitary district of Chicago ...Before Frank S. Bright, commissioner of the Supreme court of the United States.

Mode of access: Internet.

Reports of cases decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia at the ...

Publishers: Darby Printing Co., <-1990/91>.

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the state of Vermont : reported by the judges of said court, agreeably to a statute law of the state.

Imprint varies.

Report of the case of the Steamship Meteor, libelled for alleged violation of the Neutrality Act ...

I. Procedeings [sic] in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.--II. Proceedings in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York in the Second Circuit, and in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Manual of federal appellate procedure; a concise and practical treatise, annotated, on all proceedings necessary to take and perfect appeals, writs of error, petitions for review in bankruptcy, petitions to review orders of Federal trade commission, Interstate commerce commission, Federal reserve boards, decisions of District court in awards of arbitration, and federal tax appeal cases and appeals in admiralty cases ...

"Appendix (p.203-292) Rules of the United States Circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit. Revised rules for the Supreme Court of the United States, under act of February 13, 1925, as amended June 7, 1926. Requirements respecting petitions for writs of certiorari under the act of February 13, 1925. Jurisdictional act of February 13, 1925, as amended April 3, 1926. Sections 24 and 25 of the Bankruptcy act, as amended May 28, 1926, effective August 28, 1926."

Rules of court, 1905-1916 : made under the China orders in Council, 1904-1915, the foreign jurisdiction (admiralty) order in Council, 1910, and the China (companies) order in Council, 1915 /

At head of title: British jurisdiction in China.

Revised rules, adopted February 13, 1939, effective February 27, 1939, amended March 25, 1940, October 21, 1940, and May 26, 1941 [and] later amendments.

Appendix (13 pages at end): Act of February 13, 1925, chapter 229, 43 Stat. 936 (amendments to May 22, 1939, included).

The celebrated trial, Madeline Pollard vs. Breckinridge, the most noted breach of promise suit in the history of court records.

Trial of William Campbell Preston who was being sued by Miss Madeline Pollard for $50,000 in a breach of promise suit. Accused of promising to marry Miss Pollard and fathering a child and then failing to fulfill his promise. He was found guilty.

The Ontario law reports : cases determined in the Court of Appeal and in the High Court of Justice for Ontario.

Mode of access: Internet.

Cases decided in the Court of Claims of the United States at the ... with the rules of practice and the acts of Congress relating to the court /

Reporters: C.C. Mott and Archibald Hopkins, v. 8-48; William W. Scott, v. 49-50; Samuel A. Putnam, v. 51-53; Seth Shepard, v. 54-55; Harry N. Stull, v. 56-59; Ewart W. Hobbs, v. 61-74; Charles F. Kincheloe, v. 76-84; Charles F. Kincheloe and Harry N. Stull, v. 85; James A. Hoyt, v. 86-112.