The Hitch case - saving ampoules for a defendant from a chemical test for alcoholic intoxication. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Driver and Pedestrian Programs, Washington, D.C.

Minerals Separation, Ltd., et al., plaintiffs-petitioners, vs. Butte & Superior Mining Company, defendant-respondent. Brief for defendant-respondent. Thomas F. Sheridan [and others]

Cover-title.

In the Supreme Court of Illinois, Northern Grand Division, March term, A.D. 1887. August Spies et al., plaintiffs in error vs. the People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, indictment for murder.

Mode of access: Internet.

State of Michigan, plaintiff, v. State of Wisconsin, defendant.

At head of title: In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1925. Original, no. 19, in equity.

Before an Arbitration Board ... Ralph Emerson Heilman, Chairman ... Franklin Association of Chicago, plaintiff vs. Franklin Union no. 4, defendant : closing argument for the defense by Mr. David J. Saposs ... closing argument for the plaintiff, by Mr. James Hibben ... the decision of the board.

Other documents on the same case are filed with this.

The unfit defendant in Illinois : the implications of Senate Bill 133 for all mental health professionals and those involved in the criminal justice system.

Mode of access: Internet.

[Opinion of the Supreme Court] of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff and Charles Field defendant.

The lawsuit arose out of a dispute between the "orthodox" and "Hicksite" branches of the Society of Friends over the possession of a school fund.

Decision of the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, in a cause between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants. Also the opinion of the Supreme court of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff, and Charles Field, defendant.

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and Hicksite factions.

The Troy & Boston railroad company vs. the Boston, Hoosac tunnel & western railway co. Answer. Prout & Walker, defendant's solicitors and counsel.

At head of title: Circuit court of the United States, district of Vermont. In equity.

In Equity no. 169. In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California : the Equitable Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Complainant, against Western Pacific Railway Company, Chester L. Hovey, as Receiver of Boca and Loyalton Railroad Company, and Mercantile Trust Company of San Francisco, as Trustee, Defendants, and Central Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Intervening Defendant and Cross-complainant.

[V.1.] Proceedings on Master's sale -- [v.2.] Decree of forclosure and sale -- [v.3.] Ancillary decree of foreclosure and sale.

Argument submitted on behalf of the Kansas Pacific Railway Co., before the Secretary of the Interior and the Attorney-General of the U.S. /

Includes a bill filed by the Kansas Pacific and Denver railway companies to compel the Union Pacific Railroad Company to operate and use its road as required by the several acts of Congress relating thereto.

The celebrated trial, Madeline Pollard vs. Breckinridge, the most noted breach of promise suit in the history of court records.

Trial of William Campbell Preston who was being sued by Miss Madeline Pollard for $50,000 in a breach of promise suit. Accused of promising to marry Miss Pollard and fathering a child and then failing to fulfill his promise. He was found guilty.

Mercantile Trust Company vs. the Portland & Ogdensburg Railroad Company et als. : hearing on bill; answers and proofs : abstract and points in behalf of Nathan Webb, Samuel E. Spring and Weston F. Milliken, trustees /

At head of title: Circuit Court of the United States. District of New Hampshire.

Before the Interstate Commerce Commission : City of Spokane ... [and others], petitioners and complainants, vs. Northern Pacific Railway Company ... [and others], defendants; Canadian Pacific Railway Company ... [and others], defendants by order of commission; Pacific Coast Jobbers & Manufacturers' Association ... [and others], intervenors : reply brief of petitioners and complainants /

Cover title.

The Mercantile Trust Company, vs. the Portland & Ogdensburg R.R. Co. et als. in equity.

Copy of petition and decree of U.S. Circuit Court authorizing issue of $50,000 additional certificates by receiver.