1 resultado para affirmative action
em Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (38)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (12)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (4)
- Boston University Digital Common (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (58)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (28)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (11)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Harvard University (10)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (25)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (78)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (15)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (219)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (242)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (8)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (13)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (5)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (5)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (9)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (81)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
Resumo:
Differences in the workplace, also known as workforce diversity, evoke varied approaches in different countries. These include equity, equal opportunities, affirmative action and managing diversity. This paper compares methods in the US, Canada, UK, India, and South Africa. The system in each country is described and compared using several parameters. These are: the emphasis on sameness or difference; focus on individuals versus groups, classes or categories; voluntary action versus compulsory requirements; and remedies available. All are examined within the context of the national background and culture. The paper concludes that each system has both benefits and drawbacks, and gives lie to the assumption that there is any perfect legislative or voluntary approach to workplace diversity.