1 resultado para US-Canada border
em Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- Aquatic Commons (51)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Boston University Digital Common (6)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (20)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (6)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (8)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (24)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (12)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (11)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (25)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (284)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (184)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (18)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (164)
- University of Washington (11)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (20)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Differences in the workplace, also known as workforce diversity, evoke varied approaches in different countries. These include equity, equal opportunities, affirmative action and managing diversity. This paper compares methods in the US, Canada, UK, India, and South Africa. The system in each country is described and compared using several parameters. These are: the emphasis on sameness or difference; focus on individuals versus groups, classes or categories; voluntary action versus compulsory requirements; and remedies available. All are examined within the context of the national background and culture. The paper concludes that each system has both benefits and drawbacks, and gives lie to the assumption that there is any perfect legislative or voluntary approach to workplace diversity.