7 resultados para Mediterranean-scale correlations
em Universidade dos Açores - Portugal
Resumo:
Dissertação de Mestrado, Estudos Integrados dos Oceanos, 20 de Março de 2014, Universidade dos Açores.
Resumo:
TRANSCREA, Convertir la investigación y el conocimiento en innovación, propiedad intelectual e industrial. Terceira, 16 e 17 Fevereiro, 2011.
Resumo:
Dissertação de Mestrado em Psicologia da Educação, especialidade em Contextos Educativos.
Resumo:
7 th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI2014 Proceedings), Seville, Spain, 17-19 November 2014.
Resumo:
Background: Paranoid ideation has been regarded as a cognitive and a social process used as a defence against perceived threats. According to this perspective, paranoid ideation can be understood as a process extending across the normal-pathological continuum. Methods: In order to refine the construct of paranoid ideation and to validate a measure of paranoia, 906 Portuguese participants from the general population and 91 patients were administered the General Paranoia Scale (GPS), and two conceptual models (one - and tridimensional) were compared through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: Results from the CFA of the GPS confirmed a different model than the one-dimensional model proposed by Fenigstein and Vanable, which com-prised three dimensions (mistrust thoughts, persecutory ideas, and self-deprecation). This alternative model presented a better fit and increased sensitivity when compared with the one-dimensional model. Further data analysis of the scale revealed that the GPS is an adequate assessment tool for adults, with good psychometric characteristics and high internal consistency. Conclusion: The model proposed in the current work leads to further refinements and enrichment of the construct of paranoia in different populations, allowing the assessment of three dimensions of paranoia and the risk of clinical paranoia in a single measure for the general population.
Paranoia in the General Population : a revised version of the General Paranoia Scale for adolescents
Resumo:
The aim of the current study was to validate the General Paranoia Scale for Portuguese Adolescents population (GPS-A). This scale assesses the paranoid ideation in non-clinical population. Results from a confirmatory factor analysis of the scale on 1218 youths confirmed an alternative model to the one-dimensional model proposed by Fenigstein and Vanable (1992) comprising three different dimensions (Mistrust thoughts, persecutory ideas and depreciation). This alternative model presented a good fit: χ2 (162)= 727.200, p = .000; CFI = .925; RMSEA = .054, P(rmsea ≤0.05) = .000; PCFI = .788; AIC = 863.200. All items presented adequate factor loadings (λij ≥0.5) and individual reliability ((λij)2 ≥0.25). Further data analysis on the scale revealed that the GPS-A is an adequate assessment tool for adolescents, with good psychometric characteristics and high internal consistency.
Resumo:
Esta investigação incidiu sobre o modo como estudantes de uma instituição portuguesa de ensino superior percecionam a praxe académica e situações de bullying na praxe. Os dados foram recolhidos através da escala de “Avaliação das situações de Bullying nas Praxes do Ensino Superior”, organizada em três fatores: Relação Positiva com a Praxe, Relação Negativa com a Praxe e Dimensão Social (Matos, Jesus, Simões & Nave,2010). Participaram no estudo 247 estudantes de ambos os sexos, entre os 18 e os 43 anos, de diferentes anos, cursos e departamentos. Os resultados indicaram diferenças significativas a nível da Relação Positiva com a Praxe entre o género (masculino e o feminino; p=0.001 < α=0.05) e entre faixas etárias (“20 ou menos anos” e com “mais de 20 anos”; p=0.024 < α=0.05). Permitiram, também, observar diferenças significativas entre os anos dos cursos (1º, 2º ou 3º ano) a nível da Relação Positiva com a Praxe (p=0.04 < α=0.05) e da Dimensão Social (p=0.017 < α=0.05). Finalmente indicaram diferenças significativas entre os departamentos de pertença dos alunos no que concerne à Relação Positiva com a Praxe (p=0.02 < α=0.05) e à Relação Negativa com a Praxe (p=0.02 < α=0.05). As correlações obtidas entre os três apresentaram-se estatisticamente significativas, considerando nível de significância de 1% (respetivamente, p=0.02; p=0.00 e p=0.00).