Bullying in hazing pratices : a study on higher education

7 th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI2014 Proceedings), Seville, Spain, 17-19 November 2014.

About hazing In higher education

Not a year goes by that we don't hear of another hazing scandal in a higher education institution. Many researchers took interest in this issue in order to understand its causes and consequences. They provided definitions and lead to prevent it. We found hazing in many social groups around the world, with different names, and under specific forms. This paper aims to better understand hazing and its actors, with a specific focus on hazing in higher education. We presented three definitions to offer several perspectives on hazing, and facilitate its apprehension. Our method was to analyze the relevant scientific literature with the intention of reflecting on its roots and representation among individuals. Results are an exposition of motivations from hazing's actors, recommendations about how to define it and how to prevent derivations. Our main conclusions assume hazing is usually depicted as a deviant behavior, but it would appear to be a norm. Also, its core purpose would be the progression from newcomer to a group member. A lack of structure or meaning could lead to its misuse and facilitate outrageous events. In higher education, hazing seems to be used as a tool to integrate freshmen in their new institutional world. Scandals including violence, sexual and alcohol abuse could be a symptom of something deeper from hazing's environment.

Hazing practices in higher education : a study with portuguese students

Hazing practices in higher education institutions are perceived controversially. This study looked at the perception towards hazing practices of students from the University of the Azores in first cycle (n=247). It analyses if their perception was positive, emphasizing the integrative aspects of hazing practices, or if it was negative, inclining to define those practises like being violent and humiliating. The applied questionnaire measures 3 factors to define individual’s perception with hazing practices (positive relation with hazing practices, negative relation and the social dimension of the practices). This study used descriptive analyses to observe the level of agreement with hazing practices and non-parametrical statistical test to analyse the relationship between their levels of agreement with hazing practices and socio-demographic variables. Results emphasised balanced proportion of students perceiving positively and negatively those practices and incline to define hazing practices with the same components in both perceptions. It didnot highlight a strong mandatory integrative component in students’ perception. Also, results stressed a large part of students disinterested in hazing practices. Additionally factors of hazing practices’ perception showed significant relationships with respondent’s sex, age and academic degree. Hazing practices in this study did not seem to meet their main objectives of welcoming and integrating freshmen in higher education institutions.

Entrepreneurship Education : The role of the Higher Education Institutions in the Entrepreneurial Attitudes of the Students

8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. 18-20 November, 2015, Seville, Spain.

Praxe académica : meio de integração ou ações de humilhação?

Esta investigação incidiu sobre o modo como estudantes de uma instituição portuguesa de ensino superior percecionam a praxe académica e situações de bullying na praxe. Os dados foram recolhidos através da escala de “Avaliação das situações de Bullying nas Praxes do Ensino Superior”, organizada em três fatores: Relação Positiva com a Praxe, Relação Negativa com a Praxe e Dimensão Social (Matos, Jesus, Simões & Nave,2010). Participaram no estudo 247 estudantes de ambos os sexos, entre os 18 e os 43 anos, de diferentes anos, cursos e departamentos. Os resultados indicaram diferenças significativas a nível da Relação Positiva com a Praxe entre o género (masculino e o feminino; p=0.001 < α=0.05) e entre faixas etárias (“20 ou menos anos” e com “mais de 20 anos”; p=0.024 < α=0.05). Permitiram, também, observar diferenças significativas entre os anos dos cursos (1º, 2º ou 3º ano) a nível da Relação Positiva com a Praxe (p=0.04 < α=0.05) e da Dimensão Social (p=0.017 < α=0.05). Finalmente indicaram diferenças significativas entre os departamentos de pertença dos alunos no que concerne à Relação Positiva com a Praxe (p=0.02 < α=0.05) e à Relação Negativa com a Praxe (p=0.02 < α=0.05). As correlações obtidas entre os três apresentaram-se estatisticamente significativas, considerando nível de significância de 1% (respetivamente, p=0.02; p=0.00 e p=0.00).