7 resultados para Causal explanation

em Universidade dos Açores - Portugal


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Copyright © 2013 Springer Netherlands.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The paper focuses on the importance of Darwin’s work for the shaping of Henri Bergson’s philosophy, bearing on mind that the two authors first intercepted symbolically in 1859, when On the Origin of Species was published and Bergson was born. Bergson studied the biological sciences of his time, whose results were integrated in a metaphysical thought. He belonged to spiritualistic positivism, a philosophy that goes from the positive data of sciences and finds the ultimate explanation of reality in a spiritual principle. He was interested in the positive evolution of the natural world and in the works of naturalists such as Lamarck, De Vries or Eimer. Darwin was among these authors, being responsible for a vision of evolution that went from the scientific level to other domains. Bergson defends the “insufficiency of pure Darwinism” by pointing out the necessity to compensate scientific evolution with an internal metaphysical reading of the real, which he considered to be “true evolutionism”. This criticism is the most visible aspect of the relations between both works. However, an attentive look verifies that Darwin’s influence overcomes the divergence of positions concerning the extent of “evolution”. The French philosopher knew not only the 1859’s bestseller, but also studies by Darwin about ethology, entomology and botany, which contributed to the fact that the naturalist’s impact gained fundamental importance in Bergson’s philosophical perspective.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tese de Doutoramento, Física, 17 de Dezembro de 2013, Universidade dos Açores.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Copyright © 2014 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação de Mestrado em Gestão/MBA

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação de Mestrado, Ciências Biomédicas, 5 de Outubro de 2015, Universidade dos Açores.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In the business world, employees can contribute with information, ideas, concerns, opinions and proposals to their managers in respect of: (1) the way work could be performed, (2) what should / should not be done in the workplace, (3) how a particular decision can be implemented, and (4) how an organizational policy should be formed and executed (Rego, 2013). However, due to a diverse set of factors, employees often choose to remain silent in the workplace. One of these factors is psychological safety, which describes employees’ perceptions of the consequences of taking interpersonal risks in the workplace (Edmondson, 2014). The following paper is essentially a literature review and its aim is to, firstly, make a brief approach to factors reported in the literature that may affect employee voice and silence, followed up by an explanation of the types of silence that can be engaged by employees. Besides that, the authors will also make an approach to physical and psychological safety. Lastly, it will be reported some links, mentioned in the literature, between employee silence and psychological safety.