1 resultado para Robin, Barthélemy
em RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (11)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (32)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (143)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (38)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (25)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (240)
- Harvard University (5)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (13)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (18)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (7)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (5)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (21)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (12)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (33)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (22)
- University of Michigan (37)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (18)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- University of Washington (4)
Resumo:
A round-robin exercise was conducted within the CALEIDOSLIFE project. The participants were invited to assess the hazard posed by a substance, applying in silico methods and read-across approaches. The exercise was based on three endpoints: mutagenicity, bioconcentration factor and fish acute toxicity. Nine chemicals were assigned for each endpoint and the participants were invited to complete a specific questionnaire communicating their conclusions.The interesting aspect of this exercise is the justification behind the answers more than the final prediction in itself. Which tools were used? How did the approach selected affect the final answer?