effects of weight and injected dose in the liver’s Signal-to-Noise Ratio in patients submitted to PET/CT scans

The quality of the image of 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in overweight patients is commonly degraded. This study evaluates, retrospectively, the relation between SNR, weight and dose injected in 65 patients, with a range of weights from 35 to 120 kg, with scans performed using the Biograph mCT using a standardized protocol in the Nuclear Medicine Department at Radboud University Medical Centre in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Five ROI’s were made in the liver, assumed to be an organ of homogenous metabolism, at the same location, in five consecutive slices of the PET/CT scans to obtain the mean uptake (signal) values and its standard deviation (noise). The ratio of both gave us the Signal-to- Noise Ratio in the liver. With the help of a spreadsheet, weight, height, SNR and Body Mass Index were calculated and graphs were designed in order to obtain the relation between these factors. The graphs showed that SNR decreases as the body weight and/or BMI increased and also showed that, even though the dose injected increased, the SNR also decreased. This is due to the fact that heavier patients receive higher dose and, as reported, heavier patients have less SNR. These findings suggest that the quality of the images, measured by SNR, that were acquired in heavier patients are worst than thinner patients, even though higher FDG doses are given. With all this taken in consideration, it was necessary to make a new formula to calculate a new dose to give to patients and having a good and constant SNR in every patient. Through mathematic calculations, it was possible to reach to two new equations (power and exponential), which would lead to a SNR from a scan made with a specific reference weight (86 kg was the considered one) which was independent of body mass. The study implies that with these new formulas, patients heavier than the reference weight will receive higher doses and lighter patients will receive less doses. With the median being 86 kg, the new dose and new SNR was calculated and concluded that the quality of the image remains almost constant as the weight increases and the quantity of the necessary FDG remains almost the same, without increasing the costs for the total amount of FDG used in all these patients.

Níveis de referência de diagnóstico em procedimentos pediátricos de medicina nuclear

Introdução: A Medicina Nuclear (MN) é uma modalidade imagiológica em grande expansão na atualidade, tornando-se especialmente importante em pediatria. Considerando a elevada radiosensibilidade das crianças, torna-se crucial otimizar os vários procedimentos dentro desta modalidade. Objetivo: Determinar Níveis de Referência de Diagnóstico (NRD’s) para procedimentos de MN Pediátrica num dos centros de excelência nacional e comparar os valores obtidos com a literatura internacional. Material e Métodos: Foi realizada uma análise retrospetiva dos cabeçalhos Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) de Tomografia por Emissão de Positões (PET-CT) disponíveis no Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), de modo a recolher os valores de CT Dose Index (CTDIvol-mGy), Dose Length Product (DLP-mGy.cm), atividade administrada, o género, peso, altura e idade foram recolhidos; De modo a obter os valores de dose relativos a outros procedimentos de MN foram analisados documentos em formato papel. Considerando a idade dos doentes foi estabelecida a categorização etária de forma a determinar os NRD’s locais com base no percentil 75 dos valores de dose. Resultados: Os NRD’s para a atividade administrada em recém-nascidos (0 anos) para a Cintigrafia Renal e Cistografia Direta foi de 26MBq (0,70 e 0,69mCi, respetivamente). Na Renocintigrafia, o valor obtido foi 30MBq (0,80mCi). Para o exame de PET-CT corpo inteiro, os NRD’s para a atividade administrada, CTDIvol e DLP, para os 15 anos foi de 296MBq, 3,23mGy e de 396,79mGy.cm, respectivamente. Para a Cintigrafia do esqueleto o valor obtido para os 15 anos foi de 684MBq (17,5mCi). Conclusões: Após a comparação com os resultados publicados em outros estudos verificaram-se algumas diferenças, sendo os valores de NRD locais obtidos acima dos níveis apresentados.