1 resultado para NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN TREATMENT
em RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (15)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (33)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (18)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (96)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (8)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (34)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (37)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (7)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (42)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (228)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (112)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (5)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (12)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (17)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (4)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (32)
- University of Washington (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
There are currently no reliable instruments for assessing the onset and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or predicting its prognosis. Currently, a comprehensive assessment of COPD including several objective and subjective parameters is recommended. However, the lack of biomarkers precludes a correct assessment of COPD severity, which consequently hampers adequate therapeutic approaches and COPD control. In the absence of a definition of "well-controlled disease", a consensus regarding COPD control will be difficult to reach. However, COPD patient assessment should be multidimensional, and anchored in five points: control of symptoms, decline of pulmonary function, levels of physical activity, exacerbations, and Quality of Life. Several non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures are currently available to achieve disease control. Smoking cessation, vaccination, exercise training programs and pulmonary rehabilitation are recognized as important non-pharmacological measures but bronchodilators are the pivotal therapy in the control of COPD. This paper discusses several objective and subjective parameters that may bridge the gap between disease assessment and disease control. The authors conclude that, at present, it is not possible to reach a consensus regarding COPD control, essentially due to the lack of objective instruments to measure it. Some recommendations are set forth, but true COPD control awaits further objective assessments.