Neuroendocrine tumours of the female genital tract: a case-based imaging review with pathological correlation

Background Both primary and secondary gynaecological neuroendocrine (NE) tumours are uncommon, and the literature is scarce concerning their imaging features. Methods This article reviews the epidemiological, clinical and imaging features with pathological correlation of gynaecological NE tumours. Results The clinical features of gynaecological NE tumours are non-specific and depend on the organ of origin and on the extension and aggressiveness of the disease. The imaging approach to these tumours is similar to that for other histological types and the Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Staging System also applies to NE tumours. Neuroendocrine tumours were recently divided into two groups: poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). NECs include small cell carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, while NETs account for typical and atypical carcinoids. Cervical small cell carcinoma and ovarian carcinoid are the most common gynaecological NE tumours. The former typically behaves aggressively; the latter usually behaves in a benign fashion and tends to be confined to the organ. Conclusion While dealing with ovarian carcinoids, extraovarian extension, bilaterality and multinodularity raise the suspicion of metastatic disease. NE tumours of the endometrium and other gynaecological locations are very rare. Teaching Points • Primary or secondary neurondocrine (NE) tumours of the female genital tract are rare. • Cervical small cell carcinoma and ovarian carcinoids are the most common gynaecological NE tumours. • Cervical small cell carcinomas usually behave aggressively. • Ovarian carcinoids tend to behave in a benign fashion. • The imaging approach to gynaecological NE tumours and other histological types is similar.

Pitfalls em radiologia ginecológica

Para o diagnóstico radiológico das patologias ginecológicas é essencial conhecer e compreender as indicações dos vários exames disponíveis e, para cada achado radiológico, integrar a idade, o contexto clínico e a história pregressa da doente. A Ressonância Magnética (RM) tem hoje um papel crucial no diagnóstico das doenças ginecológicas. Contudo, para maximizar o potencial desta técnica é imprescindível adequar o protocolo utilizado a cada caso e a cada doente e ter em conta algumas regras imprescindíveis à interpretação dos exames, que descreveremos neste artigo. A RM ginecológica é principalmente útil no estadiamento do carcinoma do colo do útero e do endométrio, podendo por vezes ser também útil na sua detecção, na avaliação da resposta ao tratamento, detecção da recidiva ou complicações e na avaliação de lesões anexiais de natureza indeterminada na ecografia. Nas doenças benignas é frequentemente usada na avaliação pré-terapêutica de leiomiomas uterinos, bem como na adenomiose e na endometriose. Em muitas destas situações há potenciais erros e pitfalls, para os quais o médico radiologista deve estar alerta, de forma a minimizar eventuais falhas diagnósticas ou erros de estadiamento.

Estratificação pré-terapêutica do carcinoma do endométrio por ressonância magnética - papel do estudo dinâmico após administração de contraste endovenoso e do estudo ponderado em difusão

O carcinoma do endométrio apresenta uma taxa de incidência em Portugal de cerca de 7.2%, sendo a 5ª neoplasia mais comum na mulher. Apesar de apresentar uma prevalência relativamente elevada, o seu prognóstico global é favorável, uma vez que 75% dos casos são diagnosticados em estádio precoce. O estudo por ressonância magnética é geralmente efectuado após a realização de uma ecografia para avaliação de uma hemorragia uterina anormal e após o diagnóstico histológico por histeroscopia ou ressecção. Contudo, a ressonância magnética pode apresentar um papel determinante no diagnóstico em casos de impossibilidade de biópsia e nos quais a biópsia é inconclusiva. Além do mais, apesar de esta técnica não ser contemplada na classificação para o estadiamento do carcinoma do endométrio da International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics de 2009, apresenta uma função fundamental no estadiamento pré-operatório destas doentes, sendo crucial para definir a abordagem cirúrgica e terapêutica. No presente artigo, as autoras descrevem o estado da arte da ressonância magnética funcional no diagnóstico e no estadiamento do carcinoma do endométrio, chamando a atenção para o papel do estudo dinâmico após administração de contraste endovenoso e do estudo ponderado em difusão nestes cenários através da revisão da literatura mais recente sobre este tópico.

The shading sign: is it exclusive of endometriomas?

Objectives: To investigate if the shading sign is an exclusive MRI feature of endometriomas or endometrioid tumors, and to analyze its different patterns. Methods: Three hundred and fourty six women with adnexal masses who underwent 1.5/3-T MRI were included in this retrospective, board-approved study. The shading sign was found in 56 patients, but five cases were excluded due to lack of imaging follow-up or histological correlation. The final sample included 51 women. The type of tumor and the pattern of shading were recorded for each case. Results: Thirty endometriomas and five endometrioid carcinomas were found. The remaining 16 cases corresponded to other benign and malignant tumors. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73%, 93%, 59%, and 96%, respectively. Restricting the analysis to cystic lesions without solid or fat component, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73%, 96%, 94%, and 80%. Five shading patterns were identified: layering (15.7%), liquid–liquid level (11.8%), homogenous (45.1%), heterogeneous (11.8%), and focal/multifocal shading within a complex mass (19.6%). No significant correlation was found between these patterns and the type of tumor. Conclusions: The shading sign is not exclusive of endometriomas or endometrioid tumors. Homogenous shading was the most prevalent pattern in endometriomas and half of the cases with focal/multifocal shading within a complex mass were endometrioid carcinomas.

Uterine sarcomas: clinical presentation and MRI features

Uterine sarcomas are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors of mesenchymal origin, accounting for approximately 8% of uterine malignancies. They comprise leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, and adenosarcoma. Compared with the more common endometrial carcinomas, uterine sarcomas behave more aggressively and are associated with a poorer prognosis. Due to their distinct clinical and biological behavior, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics introduced a new staging system for uterine sarcomas in 2009, categorizing uterine carcinosarcoma as a variant of endometrial carcinoma, rather than a pure sarcoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a developing role in the assessment of these malignancies. Features such as tumor localization, irregular or nodular margins, necrosis, rapid growth, intense contrast enhancement, and restriction at diffusion-weighted imaging can suggest the diagnosis and help differentiate from more common leiomyomas and endometrial carcinoma. MRI is therefore extremely useful in preoperative detection and staging and, consequently, in determination of appropriate management. This pictorial review aims to discuss the clinical features of uterine sarcomas, as well as their most common appearances and distinct characteristics in MRI.