Relevance of physicochemical characterization in nanotoxicology studies

Nanomaterials (NMs) with the same chemistry can greatly differ by size, surface area, shape, stability, rigidness, coating or electrical charge and these characteristics affect nano-bio interactions, leading to different toxic potential. In this communication is shown that closely related NMs can have different genotoxic effects, evidencing the importance of investigating the toxic potential of each NM individually, instead of assuming a common mechanism and equal genotoxic effects for a set of similar NMs. The importance of considering complexity of in vivo systems in nanotoxicology, such as the use of tridimensional cellular models, air-liquid interface exposure or in vivo models that mimic human routes of exposure, is underlined.

Manufactured Nanomaterials: is there a correlation between toxicological effects and the physicochemical properties?

Toxicological information on nanomaterials (NMs) is of major importance for safety assessment, since they are already used in many consumer products and promise cutting-edge applications in the future. While the number of different NMs increases exponentially, new strategies for risk assessment are needed to cope with the safety issues, keeping pace with innovation. However, recent studies have suggested that even subtle differences in the physicochemical properties of NMs that are closely related may define different nano-bio interactions, thereby determining their toxic potential. Further research in this field is necessary to allow straightforward grouping strategies leading time-effective risk assessment to enable the safe use of the emerging NMs. In this presentation the case study of the in vitro toxicity testing of a set of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in two human cell lines from the respiratory tract will be described. Those MWCNT have been previously characterized in detail, and differ in thickness, length, aspect ratio and morphology. This comprehensive toxicological investigation undertaken in parallel with physicochemical characterization in the cellular moiety showed that the same NM did not display a consistent effect in different cell types, and that, within the same class of NM, different toxic effects could be observed. The correlation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects characterized in the two cell lines with their physicochemical properties will be presented and the relevance of considering the NMs properties in the biological context will be discussed. Overall, this case study suggests that nanotoxicity of closely related MWCNTs depends not only on their primary physicochemical properties, or combinations of these properties, but also on the cellular system, and its context. Challenges posed to toxicologists, risk assessors and regulators when addressing the safety assessment of NMs will be highlighted.

Evaluation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of benchmark multi-walled carbon nanotubes in relation to their physicochemical properties

To contribute with scientific evidence to the grouping strategy for the safety assessment of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), this work describes the investigation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of four benchmark MWCNTs in relation to their physicochemical characteristics, using two types of human respiratory cells. The cytotoxic effects were analysed using the clonogenic assay and replication index determination. A 48h-exposure of cells revealed that NM-401 was the only cytotoxic MWCNT in both cell lines, but after 8-days exposure, the clonogenic assay in A549 cells showed cytotoxic effects for all the tested MWCNTs. Correlation analysis suggested an association between the MWCNTs size in cell culture medium and cytotoxicity. No induction of DNA damage was observed after any MWCNTs in any cell line by the comet assay, while the micronucleus assay revealed that both NM-401 and NM-402 were genotoxic in A549 cells. NM-401 and NM-402 are the two longest MWCNTs analyzed in this work, suggesting that length may be determinant for genotoxicity. No induction of micronuclei was observed in Beas-2B cell line and the different effect in both cell lines is explained in view of the size-distribution of MWCNTs in the cell culture medium, rather than cell's specificities.