2 resultados para Early disease
em Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal
Resumo:
Introdution: Haemochromatosis-type IV, the ferroportin disease, is characterized by an autosomal-dominant transmission and early iron accumulation in macrophages. It is caused by mutations in the transmembrane iron exporter protein ferroportin1 (SLC40A1 gene). In form A (classic), ferroportin loss of function mutants are unable to export iron from cells leading to cellular iron accumulation with decreased availability of iron for serum transferrin (TS). We present a Portuguese rare clinical case of HH-IV. Materials and Methods: A 41-year-old woman with hyperferritinemia and normal TS. Causes of hyperferritinemia (inflammation, chronic alcohol consumption, metabolic syndrome, cell necrosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and aceruloplasminemia) were assessed. Liver iron, evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was carried out. Screening for mutation in HFE and SCL40A1 genes were performed by Sanger sequencing. Baseline: Ferritin:708ng/ml; TS: 27%; MRI:85µmol/g; Hb:13,6g/dl. Therapy: weekly 450ml Therapeutic Phlebotomies (TP) until ferritin≤50ng/ml. Results: Hyperferritinemia comorbidities and common genetic mutations for haemochromatosis were negative. However, sequencing of the patient SLC40A1 gene has revealed the presence in heterozygosity of the variant c.238G>A; p.Gly80Ser. Due to low tolerance to TP, we adopted smaller phlebotomies every three weeks. Conclusion: This patient has a rare autosomal-dominant Ferroportin disease due to a mutated ferroportin which is predicted to be defective in iron cellular export. In agreement, she presents hyperferritinemia, with normal TS and liver iron overload. The genotype/phenotype association allowed to diagnosis this rare FD case. Although a mild form A, we decided to start TP. Her father also has been treated for iron overload.
Resumo:
Background and aims: Inflammation has long been regarded as a major contributor to cellular oxidative damage and to be involved in the promotion of carcinogenesis. Methods: We aimed to investigate the oxidative damage in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients through a case–control and prospective study involving 344 IBD patients and 294 healthy controls. DNA damage and oxidative DNA damage were measured by comet assay techniques, and oxidative stress by plasmatic lipid peroxidation, protein carbonyls, and total antioxidant capacity. Results: Higher DNA damage [p < 0.001] was found both in Crohn’s disease [CD] (9.7 arbitrary units [AU]; interquartile range [IQR]: 6.2–14.0) and ulcerative colitis [UC] [7.1 AU; IQR: 4.4–11.7], when compared with controls [5.4 AU; IQR: 3.8–6.8], and this was also the case with oxidative DNA damage [p < 0.001] [CD: 3.6 AU; IQR: 1.8–6.8; UC: 4.6 AU; IQR: 2.4–8.1], when compared with controls: 2.3 AU; IQR: 1.2–4.2]. Stratifying patients into groups according to therapy (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA], azathioprine, anti-TNF, and combined therapy [azathioprine and anti-TNF]) revealed significant between-group differences in the level of DNA damage, both in CD and UC, with the combined therapy exhibiting the highest DNA damage levels [11.6 AU; IQR: 9.5–14.3, and 12.4 AU; IQR: 10.6–15.0, respectively]. Among CD patients, disease behaviour [B1 and B2], and age at diagnosis over 40 years [A3] stand as risk factors for DNA damage. For UC patients, the risk factors found for DNA damage were disease activity, treatment, age at diagnosis under 40 years [A1 + A2] and disease locations [E2 and E3]. Conclusions: In IBD there is an increase in DNA damage, and treatment, age at diagnosis and inflammatory burden seem to be risk factors.