Leadership and Pedagogical Interaction as Predictors of Learning Outcomes in Physical Education

This research aims to understand the relative contribution of leadership styles and teacher-student and student-student pedagogical interaction concerning learning performance and academic achievement in Physical Education. A quantitative methodology was implemented, comprising a sample of 447 students attending a school grouping located in the coastal region of central Portugal. In order to verify the nature, the strength and the direction of the relations among the variables, correlation and multiple regression analyses were used. For this, scales already validated and used in other researches were applied. The results show that the learning performance and the academic achievement are significantly associated with teacher leadership styles and teacher-student and student-student pedagogical interaction. A stronger association was obtained with leadership styles, especially the democratic one. It should be mentioned that these factors provide a higher relative contribution to the learning performance than to the academic achievement. The analysis conducted highlights the importance of the democratic teacher leadership style and of the pedagogical interaction established within the classroom towards the improvement of students’ ability to understand the gains and the effort made in learning.

Leadership and Pedagogical Interaction as Predictors of Learning Outcomes in Physical Education

Problem Statement: This research aims to understand the relative contribution of leadership styles and teacher-student and student-student pedagogical interaction concerning the learning performance and academic achievement in physical education. Research Questions: Are the teacher leadership style and the teacher-student and student-student pedagogical interaction related to the learning performance and academic achievement in physical education in basic schooling? Purpose of Study: There are several factors that contribute for the explanation of learning outcomes, namely teacher leadership styles in the classroom, as well as teacher-student and student-student pedagogical interactions. These factors are considered to be essential in the teaching-learning process and in the subsequent improvement of educational outcomes. Research Methods: A quantitative methodology was implemented, comprising a sample of 447 students attending a School Grouping located in the Central Region of Portugal. In order to verify the nature, the strength and the direction of the relations among the variables, correlation and multiple regression analyses were used. For this, scales already validated and used in other researches were applied. Findings: The results show that the learning performance and the academic achievement are significantly associated with teacher leadership styles and teacher-student and student-student pedagogical interaction. A stronger association was obtained with leadership styles, especially the democratic one. It should be mentioned that these factors provide a higher relative contribution to the learning performance than to the academic achievement. Conclusions: This study sought to deepen the understanding of the explanatory factors of academic success concerning the teaching-learning process in physical education. The analysis conducted highlights the importance of the democratic teacher leadership style and of the pedagogical interaction established within the classroom towards the improvement of students' ability to understand the gains and the effort made in learning.

Autoconceito e bem estar dos docentes no exercício da função educativa na escola pública

Enquadramento - O professor desempenha um papel fundamental na transferência da informação e é um mediador entre o estudante e o objeto de conhecimentos, orientando e organizando o ensino para que a aprendizagem se efectue. Um dos grandes desafios da Educação Municipal está em manter os professores motivados para o desempenho contribuindo assim para o sucesso escolar dos seus alunos. Propomo-nos analisar que variaveis contribuiram para o auto conceito e bem estar dos docentes diante das mudanças e tecnologias inseridas no dia a dia da sala de aula. Método: Optamos pelo método de pesquisa com abordagem quantitativa numa primeira fase. Foi utilizado como técnica de coleta de dados, questionário de Vaz Serra 1986) e, numa 2ª fase o focus groupo com discussão e interpretação dos resultados obtidos em cada dimensão do questionário de autoconceito. A amostra foi constituida por 42 professores, do ensino fundamental publico Brasileiro. Resultados: Os professores eram casados, tinham idades compreendidas entre os 20 e os 40 anos, maioritáriamente de raça negra e 66% trabalham em mais do que uma escola. 80% dos professores apresentam valores de autoconceito abaixo da média. As incongruências, dificuldades e clima organizacional da escola faziam aflorar as discrepâncias emocionais e comportamentais. Mesmo situações descritas como derrotistas ou mesmo limitadoras do raio de ação do sujeito como o trabalho em organismo público, nos sujeitos que se posicionavam nas respostas do inventário com atitudes proativas as dificuldades não representaram um estancamento da ação. Conclusão: O Autoconceito e auto estima do professor são projetados no ambiente como fruto da interação humana atual com os constructos internos do sujeito. É necessário intervir ao nível do autoconceito e autoestima do professor para uma melhor qualidade de ensino e de vivencia escolar mais gratificante. Palavras-Chave: educação; personalidade; autoconceito; autoestima; docente.

Peer interaction in mixed age groups: a study in the computer area of an early childhood education center in Portugal

The study was developed as a teacher-research project during initial teacher education – Masters Degree of Early Childhood and Primary Education, in Portugal. It analysed the interactions between children of 3 to 6 years old, during the use of the computer as a free choice activity, confronting situations between peers of the same age and situations between peers of different ages. The focus of the analysis was the collaborative interactions. This was a qualitative study. Children could choose the computer, amongst other interest areas, and work for around an hour in pairs. In the computer, children used mainly educational games. During four weeks, the interactions between the pairs were audio recorded. Field notes and informal interviews to the children were also used to collect data. Eleven children were involved in the study with ages ranging from 3 to 6 years old. Baseline data on children’s basic computer proficiency was collected using the Individualized Computer Proficiency Checklist (ICPC) by Hyun. The recorded interactions were analysed using the types of talk offered by Scrimshaw and Perkins and Wegerif and Scrimshaw: cumulative talk, exploratory talk, disputational talk, and tutorial talk. This framework was already used in a study in an early childhood education context in Portugal by Amante. The results reveal differences in computer use and characterize the observed interactions. Seven different pairs of children's interactions were analysed. More than a third of the interactions were cumulative talk, followed by exploratory talk, tutorial talk and disputational talk. Comparing same and mixed age pairs, we observed that cumulative talk is the more present interaction, but in same age pairs this is followed by exploratory talk whereas in the mixed age pairs it is tutorial talk that has the second largest percentage. The pairs formed by the children were very asymmetrical in terms of age and computer proficiency. This lead to the more tutorial interactions, where one children showed the other or directed him/her on how to play. The results show that collaboration is present during the use of a computer area in early childhood education. The free choice of the children means the adults can only suggest pairing suited to specific interactions between the children. Another way to support children in more exploratory talk interactions could be by discussing the way the older children can help the younger ones beyond directing or correcting their work.