Índice acumulativo de riesgo (nice) como prueba diagnóstica con base en tomografía corneal por elevación en la prevención de ectasia corneal post-lasik


Autoria(s): Navarro Naranjo, Pedro Iván
Contribuinte(s)

Torres de Galvis, Yolanda

Bareño, Jose

Data(s)

12/09/2016

31/12/1969

Resumo

Antecedentes La ectasia corneal post-lasik (ECPL) es una complicación infrecuente, pero devastadora en la cirugía lasik (queratomileusis asistida con éxcimer láser) para el tratamiento de la miopía con o sin astigmatismo. Con base en la tomografía corneal por elevación por imágenes de Scheimpflug (Sistema Pentacam HR, Oculus Wetzlar, Alemania), se propone un novedoso índice acumulativo de riesgo para ser utilizado como prueba diagnóstica de tamizaje y así prevenir esta complicación. Metodología Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico, de corte transversal tipo pruebas diagnósticas, con el fin de evaluar las características operativas del índice NICE teniendo como estándar de referencia el módulo de Belin-Ambrosio (Pentacam HR) utilizando un modelo de regresión logística binaria, tablas de contingencia y estimando el área bajo la curva ROC. Resultados Se evaluaron 361 ojos de los cuales el 59,3% provenían de pacientes de sexo femenino, la edad media global fue de 30 años (RIC 11,0). El modelo logístico binario aplicado se construyó con base en cuatro variables independientes cuantitativas (K2, PAQUI, EP e I-S) y una cualitativa (SEXO), y se determinó su relación con la variable dependiente, NICE (puntaje final). Las variables predictoras fueron estadísticamente significativas clasificando adecuadamente el 92,9% de los ojos evaluados según presencia o ausencia de riesgo. El coeficiente de Nagelkerke fue de 74,4%. Conclusiones El índice acumulativo de riesgo NICE es una herramienta diagnóstica novedosa en la evaluación de candidatos a cirugía refractiva lasik para prevenir la ectasia secundaria.

Background Post-lasik corneal ectasia (PLCE) is an infrequent but devastating complication in lasik surgery to treat patients with myopia with or without astigmatism. Based on elevation corneal tomography through Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR System, Oculus Weztlar, Germany), we proposed a novel cummulative risk index to be used as a screening diagnostic tool to prevent this surgical complication. Methodology We performed an analytic observational cross-sectional study with diagnostic test design aimed to evaluate receiver operating characteristics of NICE index using Belin-Ambrosio display as a standard of reference (Pentacam HR, Wetzlar Germany). We performed a binary logistic regression model, 2x2 contingence tables and measured area under curve ROC. Results A final study sample of 361 eyes, 59,3% from female patients with median age of 30 years old (IQR 11,0) were evaluated. Binary logistic regression model included four independent quantitative variables (K2, PAQUI, EP, I-S) and one qualitative (SEX) were evaluated to know their relationship to dependent variable, NICE (Final Score). Four independent quantitative variables and one qualitative were statistically significant; NICE index classified adequately 92% of patients included in the study regarding presence or absence of PLCE risk. Nagelkerke coefficient was estimated on 74,4%. Conclusions Cummulative risk index NICE is a novel diagnostic test to evaluate lasik refractive surgery candidates to prevent secondary corneal ectasia.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/12505

Idioma(s)

spa

Publicador

Facultad de medicina

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess

Fonte

instname:Universidad del Rosario

reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR

Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in sity keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 14:312–7.

Moshirfar M, Smedley J, Muthappan V, Jarsted A, Ostler E. Rate of ectasia and incidence of irregular topography in patients with unidentified preoperative risk factors undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;9:35–40

Randleman B, Russell B, Ward M, Thompson K, Stulting D. Risk factor and prognosis for corneal ectasia after lasik. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2 February):267–75.

Chan CK, Hodge C, Sutton G. External analysis of the Randleman ectasia risk factor score system: A review of 36 cases of post-LASIK ectasia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38:335–40.

Pallikaris IG, Papatsanaki M.textClipping

Belin M, Ambrosio R. Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61:401–6.

Tabbara KF, Kobt AA. Risk factors for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(9):1618–22.

Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:37–50.

Tatar M, Kantarci F, Yildirim A, Uslu H, Colak H, Goker H, Gurler B. Risk factors in post-lasik corneal ectasia. J Ophthalmol. 2014;204191:1–4.

Taravella M, Scott T, Perozek T. LASIK Myopia. Medscape [Internet]. 2016; Disponible en: www.emedicine.medscape.com

Netto M, De Espíndola R, Fernandes Nogueira R, Campos M, Ambrósio Jr R, De Andrade N. Brazilian Trends in Refractive Surgery. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013;76(1):29–32

Stojanovic A, Nitter TA. 200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism: six and twelve months outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(8):1263–77.

Barraquer JI. Queratomileusis y queratofaquia. Instituto Barraquer de América. 1980. 342 p.

Reinstein D, Archer T, Gobbe M. The history of lasik. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(4):291–8.

Rabinowitz YS. Videokeratography indexes to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 1995;11(5):371–9.

Gatinel D, Saad A. The challenges of the detection of subclinical keratoconus at its earliest stage. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1(1):36–43.

Saad A, Gatinel D. Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. IOVS. 2010;51(11):5546–55

Maeda N, Klyce S, Smolek M. Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography. Arch Opthalmology. 1995;113(7).

Sedghipour MR, Sadigh AL, Motlagh BF. Revisiting corneal topography for the diagnosis of keratoconus: use of Rabinowitz KISA% index. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:181–4.

Binder P, Lindstrom R, Stulting D, Donnenfeld E, Wu H, McDonnell P, Rabinowitz Y. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after lasik. J Cataract Refract Surg. 31:2035–8

Kamiya K, Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarasi A. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification. Bristish J Ophthalmol. 98:459– 63.

Saad A, Gatinel D. Validation of a new scoring for the detection of early forme of keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1:100–8.

Ambrósio R, Ramos I, Lopes B, Canedo ALC, Price Jr F, Schallhorn S, et al. Assessing ectasia suceptibility prior to LASIK: the role of the age and residual stromal bed (RSB) in conjunction to Belin-Ambrósio deviation index (BAD-D). Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2014;73(2):75–80.

Jones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:453–8.

Carley S, Dosman S, Jones SR, Harrison M. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:180–1.

Fagan T. Nomogram for Baye’s Theorem. N Engl J Med. 2014;293(5):291.

Kymionis G, Bouzoukis D, Diakonis V, Yoo S. Long-term results of thin corneas after refractive laser surgery. AJO. 2007;144(2):181–5.

Palavras-Chave #Epidemiología #614.4 #Epidemiología #Oftalmología #Córnea #Oftalmopatías #Excimer laser #in-situ keratomileusi #ectasia #myopia #corneal topography #logistic regression #regression #sensitivity AND specificity #ROC curve
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis

info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion